These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22037896)

  • 21. AIDS and the future of reproductive freedom.
    Bayer R
    Milbank Q; 1990; 68(Suppl. 2):179-204. PubMed ID: 11653914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Exploring the ethics of induced abortion.
    Bandewar S
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2005; 2(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 16276621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prenatal screening: current practice, new developments, ethical challenges.
    de Jong A; Maya I; van Lith JM
    Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 25521968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of the Human Genome Initiative on women's rights and reproductive decisions.
    Charo RA
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 1993 Apr; 8(Suppl. 1):148-59. PubMed ID: 11653014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Eugenics, genetics, and the minority group model of disabilities: implications for social work advocacy.
    O'Brien GV
    Soc Work; 2011 Oct; 56(4):347-54. PubMed ID: 22308667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cross-cultural perspectives on decision making regarding noninvasive prenatal testing: A comparative study of Lebanon and Quebec.
    Haidar H; Vanstone M; Laberge AM; Bibeau G; Ghulmiyyah L; Ravitsky V
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(2):99-111. PubMed ID: 29847254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A critique of some feminist challenges to prenatal diagnosis.
    Wertz DC; Fletcher JC
    J Womens Health; 1993; 2(2):173-88. PubMed ID: 11659670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: a result of the cultural turn?
    Bromage DI
    Med Humanit; 2006 Jun; 32(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 17036441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perfect mothers, perfect babies: an examination of the ethics of fetal treatments.
    Kaufmann CL
    Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 11650373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Commentary on 'Opt-out HIV testing: an ethical analysis of women's reproductive rights'.
    Seloilwe ES
    Nurs Ethics; 2011 Sep; 18(5):743-5. PubMed ID: 21642331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Challenging the rhetoric of choice in prenatal screening.
    Seavilleklein V
    Bioethics; 2009 Jan; 23(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 19076943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Expressivism at the beginning and end of life.
    Reed P
    J Med Ethics; 2020 Aug; 46(8):538-544. PubMed ID: 32611620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: a challenge to practice and policy.
    Asch A
    Am J Public Health; 1999 Nov; 89(11):1649-57. PubMed ID: 10553384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The paradox of disability in abortion debates: bringing the pro-choice and disability rights communities together.
    Jesudason S; Epstein J
    Contraception; 2011 Dec; 84(6):541-3. PubMed ID: 22078180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Embryo screening: update German view of genetic testing.
    Propping P; Schott H
    Nature; 2014 Jun; 510(7506):473. PubMed ID: 24965640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Congenital disability and medical research: the development of amniocentesis.
    McDonough P
    Women Health; 1990; 16(3-4):137-53. PubMed ID: 2267804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prenatal screening, autonomy and reasons: the relationship between the law of abortion and wrongful birth.
    Scott R
    Med Law Rev; 2003; 11(3):265-325. PubMed ID: 16733877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Up against eugenics: disabled women's challenge to receive reproductive health services.
    Waxman BF
    Sex Disabil; 1994; 12(2):155-71. PubMed ID: 11656410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Legal and ethical standards for protecting women's human rights and the practice of conscientious objection in reproductive healthcare settings.
    Zampas C
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Dec; 123 Suppl 3():S63-5. PubMed ID: 24332237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reproductive freedom, self-regulation, and the government of impairment in utero.
    Tremain S
    Hypatia; 2006; 21(1):35-53. PubMed ID: 17111555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.