312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22038764)
1. Genomics really gets personal: how exome and whole genome sequencing challenge the ethical framework of human genetics research.
Tabor HK; Berkman BE; Hull SC; Bamshad MJ
Am J Med Genet A; 2011 Dec; 155A(12):2916-24. PubMed ID: 22038764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethical and legal implications of whole genome and whole exome sequencing in African populations.
Wright GE; Koornhof PG; Adeyemo AA; Tiffin N
BMC Med Ethics; 2013 May; 14():21. PubMed ID: 23714101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Self-guided management of exome and whole-genome sequencing results: changing the results return model.
Yu JH; Jamal SM; Tabor HK; Bamshad MJ
Genet Med; 2013 Sep; 15(9):684-90. PubMed ID: 23619276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The challenge of informed consent and return of results in translational genomics: empirical analysis and recommendations.
Henderson GE; Wolf SM; Kuczynski KJ; Joffe S; Sharp RR; Parsons DW; Knoppers BM; Yu JH; Appelbaum PS
J Law Med Ethics; 2014; 42(3):344-55. PubMed ID: 25264092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Practices and policies of clinical exome sequencing providers: analysis and implications.
Jamal SM; Yu JH; Chong JX; Dent KM; Conta JH; Tabor HK; Bamshad MJ
Am J Med Genet A; 2013 May; 161A(5):935-50. PubMed ID: 23610049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethical issues raised by whole genome sequencing.
Pinxten W; Howard HC
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2014 Apr; 28(2):269-79. PubMed ID: 24810188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Why genomics shouldn't get too personal: in favor of filters: Re: invited comment by Holly K. Tabor et al. in American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A Volume 155.
Christenhusz GM; Devriendt K; Vermeesch J; Dierickx K
Am J Med Genet A; 2012 Oct; 158A(10):2641-2; author reply 2643-4. PubMed ID: 22903581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Considering the Benefits and Risks of Research Participants' Access to Sequence Data.
Haga SB; Friedman B; Richard G
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2017 Dec; 21(12):717-721. PubMed ID: 29045186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencing.
Yu JH; Harrell TM; Jamal SM; Tabor HK; Bamshad MJ
Am J Hum Genet; 2014 Jul; 95(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 24975944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Key Implications of Data Sharing in Pediatric Genomics.
Rahimzadeh V; Schickhardt C; Knoppers BM; Sénécal K; Vears DF; Fernandez CV; Pfister S; Plon S; Terry S; Williams J; Williams MS; Cornel M; Friedman JM
JAMA Pediatr; 2018 May; 172(5):476-481. PubMed ID: 29554172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project.
Sanderson SC; Linderman MD; Suckiel SA; Diaz GA; Zinberg RE; Ferryman K; Wasserstein M; Kasarskis A; Schadt EE
Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 Jan; 24(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 26036856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Consent to 'personal' genomics and privacy. Direct-to-consumer genetic tests and population genome research challenge traditional notions of privacy and consent.
Knoppers BM
EMBO Rep; 2010 Jun; 11(6):416-9. PubMed ID: 20448662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revealing the results of whole-genome sequencing and whole-exome sequencing in research and clinical investigations: some ethical issues.
Hallowell N; Hall A; Alberg C; Zimmern R
J Med Ethics; 2015 Apr; 41(4):317-21. PubMed ID: 25038088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Balancing the risks and benefits of genomic data sharing: genome research participants' perspectives.
Oliver JM; Slashinski MJ; Wang T; Kelly PA; Hilsenbeck SG; McGuire AL
Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 22213783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Knowing who to trust: exploring the role of 'ethical metadata' in mediating risk of harm in collaborative genomics research in Africa.
de Vries J; Williams TN; Bojang K; Kwiatkowski DP; Fitzpatrick R; Parker M
BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Aug; 15():62. PubMed ID: 25124199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Balancing Benefits and Risks of Immortal Data: Participants' Views of Open Consent in the Personal Genome Project.
Zarate OA; Brody JG; Brown P; Ramirez-Andreotta MD; Perovich L; Matz J
Hastings Cent Rep; 2016; 46(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 26678513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues (ELSI) of Responsible Data Sharing Involving Children in Genomics: A Systematic Literature Review of Reasons.
Rahimzadeh V; Knoppers BM; Bartlett G
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2020; 11(4):233-245. PubMed ID: 32975491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Informed consent for whole genome sequencing: a qualitative analysis of participant expectations and perceptions of risks, benefits, and harms.
Tabor HK; Stock J; Brazg T; McMillin MJ; Dent KM; Yu JH; Shendure J; Bamshad MJ
Am J Med Genet A; 2012 Jun; 158A(6):1310-9. PubMed ID: 22532433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethical frameworks for obtaining informed consent in tumour profiling: an evidence-based case for Singapore.
Bylstra Y; Lysaght T; Thrivikraman J; Watson S; Tan P
Hum Genomics; 2017 Dec; 11(1):31. PubMed ID: 29221462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Misattributed parentage as an unanticipated finding during exome/genome sequencing: current clinical laboratory practices and an opportunity for standardization.
Eno C; Bayrak-Toydemir P; Bean L; Braxton A; Chao EC; El-Khechen D; Esplin ED; Friedman B; Hagman KDF; Hambuch T; Hernandez A; Juusola J; Londre G; Machado J; Mao R; Mighion L; Rehm HL; Ward P; Deignan JL
Genet Med; 2019 Apr; 21(4):861-866. PubMed ID: 30214068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
