These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22038781)
1. On the use of distance constraints in protein-protein docking computations. Shih ES; Hwang MJ Proteins; 2012 Jan; 80(1):194-205. PubMed ID: 22038781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Energy minimization in low-frequency normal modes to efficiently allow for global flexibility during systematic protein-protein docking. May A; Zacharias M Proteins; 2008 Feb; 70(3):794-809. PubMed ID: 17729269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determining the three-dimensional fold of a protein from approximate constraints: a simulation study. Soman KV; Braun W Cell Biochem Biophys; 2001; 34(3):283-304. PubMed ID: 11898858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A holistic molecular docking approach for predicting protein-protein complex structure. Gong X; Liu B; Chang S; Li C; Chen W; Wang C Sci China Life Sci; 2010 Sep; 53(9):1152-61. PubMed ID: 21104376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DOCKGROUND system of databases for protein recognition studies: unbound structures for docking. Gao Y; Douguet D; Tovchigrechko A; Vakser IA Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):845-51. PubMed ID: 17803215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimized grid-based protein-protein docking as a global search tool followed by incorporating experimentally derivable restraints. Huang W; Liu H Proteins; 2012 Mar; 80(3):691-702. PubMed ID: 22190391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking. Huang SY; Zou X Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 17096427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization by NMR and molecular modeling of the binding of polyisoprenols and polyisoprenyl recognition sequence peptides: 3D structure of the complexes reveals sites of specific interactions. Zhou GP; Troy FA Glycobiology; 2003 Feb; 13(2):51-71. PubMed ID: 12626407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. BiGGER: a new (soft) docking algorithm for predicting protein interactions. Palma PN; Krippahl L; Wampler JE; Moura JJ Proteins; 2000 Jun; 39(4):372-84. PubMed ID: 10813819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Structure-based prediction of transcription factor binding sites using a protein-DNA docking approach. Liu Z; Guo JT; Li T; Xu Y Proteins; 2008 Sep; 72(4):1114-24. PubMed ID: 18320590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel shape complementarity scoring function for protein-protein docking. Chen R; Weng Z Proteins; 2003 May; 51(3):397-408. PubMed ID: 12696051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Progress in computation and amide hydrogen exchange for prediction of protein-protein complexes. Law D; Hotchko M; Ten Eyck L Proteins; 2005 Aug; 60(2):302-7. PubMed ID: 15981246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. FDS: flexible ligand and receptor docking with a continuum solvent model and soft-core energy function. Taylor RD; Jewsbury PJ; Essex JW J Comput Chem; 2003 Oct; 24(13):1637-56. PubMed ID: 12926007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]