These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22039564)

  • 1. Development of face processing.
    Pascalis O; de Martin de Viviés X; Anzures G; Quinn PC; Slater AM; Tanaka JW; Lee K
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2011 Nov; 2(6):666-675. PubMed ID: 22039564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developmental changes in analytic and holistic processes in face perception.
    Joseph JE; DiBartolo MD; Bhatt RS
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1165. PubMed ID: 26300838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial-frequency thresholds for configural and featural discriminations in upright and inverted faces.
    Watier NN; Collin CA; Boutet I
    Perception; 2010; 39(4):502-13. PubMed ID: 20514998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neurophysiological Correlates of Featural and Spacing Processing for Face and Non-face Stimuli.
    Negrini M; Brkić D; Pizzamiglio S; Premoli I; Rivolta D
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():333. PubMed ID: 28348535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aging Strikes the Self-Face Advantage in Featural Processing.
    Qian H; Wang Z; Yan L; Gao X
    Exp Aging Res; 2017; 43(4):379-390. PubMed ID: 28718751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cultural Differences in the Time Course of Configural and Featural Processing for Own-race Faces.
    Wang H; Qiu R; Li W; Li S; Fu S
    Neuroscience; 2020 Oct; 446():157-170. PubMed ID: 32891705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence of a shift from featural to configural face processing in infancy.
    Schwarzer G; Zauner N; Jovanovic B
    Dev Sci; 2007 Jul; 10(4):452-63. PubMed ID: 17552935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Featural and configural face processing in adults and infants: a behavioral and electrophysiological investigation.
    Scott LS
    Perception; 2006; 35(8):1107-28. PubMed ID: 17076069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Configural but Not Featural Face Information Is Associated With Automatic Processing.
    Wang H; Chen E; Li J; Ji F; Lian Y; Fu S
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():884823. PubMed ID: 35496070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face.
    Tanaka JW; Kaiser MD; Hagen S; Pierce LJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1000-14. PubMed ID: 24477773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple paths to holistic processing: Holistic processing of Gestalt stimuli do not overlap with holistic face processing in the same manner as do objects of expertise.
    Curby KM; Huang M; Moerel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Apr; 81(3):716-726. PubMed ID: 30569435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing.
    Mondloch CJ; Le Grand R; Maurer D
    Perception; 2002; 31(5):553-66. PubMed ID: 12044096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Featural, configural, and holistic face-processing strategies evoke different scan patterns.
    Bombari D; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
    Perception; 2009; 38(10):1508-21. PubMed ID: 19950482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The time course of holistic processing is similar for face and non-face Gestalt stimuli.
    Curby KM; Teichmann L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 May; 84(4):1234-1247. PubMed ID: 35460025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural correlates of processing facial identity based on features versus their spacing.
    Maurer D; O'Craven KM; Le Grand R; Mondloch CJ; Springer MV; Lewis TL; Grady CL
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(7):1438-51. PubMed ID: 17204295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The respective role of low and high spatial frequencies in supporting configural and featural processing of faces.
    Goffaux V; Hault B; Michel C; Vuong QC; Rossion B
    Perception; 2005; 34(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 15773608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Face specific inversion effects provide evidence for two subtypes of developmental prosopagnosia.
    Bennetts RJ; Gregory NJ; Tree J; Di Bernardi Luft C; Banissy MJ; Murray E; Penton T; Bate S
    Neuropsychologia; 2022 Sep; 174():108332. PubMed ID: 35839963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Social experience drives the development of holistic face processing in paper wasps.
    Pardo-Sanchez J; Tibbetts EA
    Anim Cogn; 2023 Mar; 26(2):465-476. PubMed ID: 36066686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recognizing degraded faces: the contribution of configural and featural cues.
    Gilad-Gutnick S; Sinha P
    Perception; 2012; 41(12):1497-511. PubMed ID: 23586289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distinct abilities associated with matching same identity faces versus discriminating different faces: Evidence from individual differences in prosopagnosics and controls.
    Berger A; Fry R; Bobak AK; Juliano A; DeGutis J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Dec; 75(12):2256-2271. PubMed ID: 35034524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.