These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22040178)

  • 21. Left ventricular lead electrical delay predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Singh JP; Fan D; Heist EK; Alabiad CR; Taub C; Reddy V; Mansour M; Picard MH; Ruskin JN; Mela T
    Heart Rhythm; 2006 Nov; 3(11):1285-92. PubMed ID: 17074633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Determinants of the time-to-peak left ventricular dP/dt (Td) and QRS duration with different fusion strategies in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Odland HH; Holm T; Cornelussen R; Kongsgård E
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():979581. PubMed ID: 36186985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of resynchronization therapy stimulation site on the systolic function of heart failure patients.
    Butter C; Auricchio A; Stellbrink C; Fleck E; Ding J; Yu Y; Huvelle E; Spinelli J;
    Circulation; 2001 Dec; 104(25):3026-9. PubMed ID: 11748094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. First-in-man implantation of leadless ultrasound-based cardiac stimulation pacing system: novel endocardial left ventricular resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients.
    Auricchio A; Delnoy PP; Regoli F; Seifert M; Markou T; Butter C;
    Europace; 2013 Aug; 15(8):1191-7. PubMed ID: 23703364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Echocardiographic myocardial scar burden predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in ischemic heart failure.
    Mele D; Agricola E; Galderisi M; Rigo F; Citro R; Dal Monte A; Della Valentina P; Calabrese A; Ferrari R;
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2009 Jun; 22(6):702-8. PubMed ID: 19423292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of pacing site characteristics on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Wong JA; Yee R; Stirrat J; Scholl D; Krahn AD; Gula LJ; Skanes AC; Leong-Sit P; Klein GJ; McCarty D; Fine N; Goela A; Islam A; Thompson T; Drangova M; White JA
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jul; 6(4):542-50. PubMed ID: 23741053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mechanistic insights into the benefits of multisite pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: The importance of electrical substrate and rate of left ventricular activation.
    Sohal M; Shetty A; Niederer S; Lee A; Chen Z; Jackson T; Behar JM; Claridge S; Bostock J; Hyde E; Razavi R; Prinzen F; Rinaldi CA
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Dec; 12(12):2449-57. PubMed ID: 26165943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Computer based optimization of biventricular pacing according to the left ventricular 17 myocardial segments.
    Miri R; Reumann M; Keller D; Farina D; Dössel O
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():1418-21. PubMed ID: 18002231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of triangle ventricular pacing on haemodynamics and dyssynchrony in patients with advanced heart failure: a comparison study with conventional bi-ventricular pacing therapy.
    Yoshida K; Seo Y; Yamasaki H; Tanoue K; Murakoshi N; Ishizu T; Sekiguchi Y; Kawano S; Otsuka S; Watanabe S; Yamaguchi I; Aonuma K
    Eur Heart J; 2007 Nov; 28(21):2610-9. PubMed ID: 17947217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mechanical dyssynchrony assessed by speckle tracking imaging as a reliable predictor of acute and chronic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Seo Y; Ishizu T; Sakamaki F; Yamamoto M; Machino T; Yamasaki H; Kawamura R; Yoshida K; Sekiguchi Y; Kawano S; Tada H; Watanabe S; Aonuma K
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2009 Jul; 22(7):839-46. PubMed ID: 19560661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Preferred left ventricular lead position for upgrade from right ventricular pacing to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Ogano M; Iwasaki YK; Okada T; Tanabe J; Shimizu W; Asai K
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2023 Sep; 34(9):1925-1932. PubMed ID: 37449446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of posterolateral scar tissue on clinical and echocardiographic improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Bleeker GB; Kaandorp TA; Lamb HJ; Boersma E; Steendijk P; de Roos A; van der Wall EE; Schalij MJ; Bax JJ
    Circulation; 2006 Feb; 113(7):969-76. PubMed ID: 16476852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Absence of additional improvement in outcome of patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy paced at the most delayed left ventricular region.
    Deplagne A; Lafitte S; Reuter S; Reant P; Ploux S; Mokrani B; Roudaut R; Jais P; Haissaguerre M; Clementy J; DosSantos P; Bordachar P
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2009; 102(8-9):641-9. PubMed ID: 19786268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The use of multisite left ventricular pacing via quadripolar lead improves acute haemodynamics and mechanical dyssynchrony assessed by radial strain speckle tracking: initial results.
    Osca J; Alonso P; Cano O; Andrés A; Miro V; Tello MJ; Olagüe J; Martínez L; Salvador A
    Europace; 2016 Apr; 18(4):560-7. PubMed ID: 26333378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stimulation rate and the optimal interventricular interval during cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation.
    van Gelder BM; Meijer A; Bracke FA
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 May; 31(5):569-74. PubMed ID: 18439170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Invasive optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: role of sequential biventricular and left ventricular pacing.
    Kurzidim K; Reinke H; Sperzel J; Schneider HJ; Danilovic D; Siemon G; Neumann T; Hamm CW; Pitschner HF
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Aug; 28(8):754-61. PubMed ID: 16105000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multipoint pacing by a left ventricular quadripolar lead improves the acute hemodynamic response to CRT compared with conventional biventricular pacing at any site.
    Zanon F; Baracca E; Pastore G; Marcantoni L; Fraccaro C; Lanza D; Picariello C; Aggio S; Roncon L; Dell'Avvocata F; Rigatelli G; Pacetta D; Noventa F; Prinzen FW
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 May; 12(5):975-81. PubMed ID: 25625721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Electrical and mechanical components of dyssynchrony in heart failure patients with normal QRS duration and left bundle-branch block: impact of left and biventricular pacing.
    Turner MS; Bleasdale RA; Vinereanu D; Mumford CE; Paul V; Fraser AG; Frenneaux MP
    Circulation; 2004 Jun; 109(21):2544-9. PubMed ID: 15148267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Body surface mapping using an ECG belt to characterize electrical heterogeneity for different left ventricular pacing sites during cardiac resynchronization: Relationship with acute hemodynamic improvement.
    Johnson WB; Vatterott PJ; Peterson MA; Bagwe S; Underwood RD; Bank AJ; Gage RM; Ramza B; Foreman BW; Splett V; Haddad T; Gillberg JM; Ghosh S
    Heart Rhythm; 2017 Mar; 14(3):385-391. PubMed ID: 27871987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with and without pressure-volume loop optimization: comparison of the long-term efficacy of two different programming strategies.
    Ciconte G; Ćalović Ž; McSpadden LC; Ryu K; Mangual J; Caporaso I; Baldi M; Saviano M; Cuko A; Vitale R; Conti M; Giannelli L; Vicedomini G; Santinelli V; Pappone C
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2019 Mar; 54(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 30483980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.