These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22040506)

  • 1. Effects of different pacing algorithms on cumulative ventricular pacing proportion in patients with pacemakers.
    Xiao CH; Zhang XW; Wang RX; Cheng YL; Zhang CY; Wang LB; Yang WF; Yang XJ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Sep; 124(18):2937-42. PubMed ID: 22040506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduction of unnecessary right ventricular pacing by managed ventricular pacing and search AV+ algorithms in pacemaker patients: 12-month follow-up results of a randomized study.
    Chen S; Chen K; Tao Q; Zheng L; Shen F; Wu S; Fan J; Xu G; Wang L; Zhou X; Zhang S;
    Europace; 2014 Nov; 16(11):1595-602. PubMed ID: 24706091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of two strategies to reduce ventricular pacing in pacemaker patients.
    Pürerfellner H; Brandt J; Israel C; Sheldon T; Johnson J; Tscheliessnigg K; Sperzel J; Boriani G; Puglisi A; Milasinovic G
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Feb; 31(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18233969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multicenter, prospective, randomized safety and efficacy study of a new atrial-based managed ventricular pacing mode (MVP) in dual chamber ICDs.
    Sweeney MO; Ellenbogen KA; Casavant D; Betzold R; Sheldon T; Tang F; Mueller M; Lingle J;
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2005 Aug; 16(8):811-7. PubMed ID: 16101620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Managed ventricular pacing vs. conventional dual-chamber pacing for elective replacements: the PreFER MVP study: clinical background, rationale, and design.
    Quesada A; Botto G; Erdogan A; Kozak M; Lercher P; Nielsen JC; Piot O; Ricci R; Weiss C; Becker D; Wetzels G; De Roy L;
    Europace; 2008 Mar; 10(3):321-6. PubMed ID: 18308753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reducing unnecessary right ventricular pacing with the managed ventricular pacing mode in patients with sinus node disease and AV block.
    Gillis AM; Pürerfellner H; Israel CW; Sunthorn H; Kacet S; Anelli-Monti M; Tang F; Young M; Boriani G;
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Jul; 29(7):697-705. PubMed ID: 16884504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Percent ventricular pacing with managed ventricular pacing mode in standard pacemaker population.
    Milasinovic G; Tscheliessnigg K; Boehmer A; Vancura V; Schuchert A; Brandt J; Wiggenhorn C; Hofman M; Sperzel J
    Europace; 2008 Feb; 10(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 18203737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relationship between right ventricular pacing and atrial fibrillation burden and disease progression in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the long-MinVPACE study.
    Veasey RA; Arya A; Silberbauer J; Sharma V; Lloyd GW; Patel NR; Sulke AN
    Europace; 2011 Jun; 13(6):815-20. PubMed ID: 21208945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Managed ventricular pacing in pediatric patients and patients with congenital heart disease.
    Kaltman JR; Ro PS; Zimmerman F; Moak JP; Epstein M; Zeltser IJ; Shah MJ; Buck K; Vetter VL; Tanel RE
    Am J Cardiol; 2008 Oct; 102(7):875-8. PubMed ID: 18805114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reduction of RV pacing by continuous optimization of the AV interval.
    Milasinovic G; Sperzel J; Smith TW; Mead H; Brandt J; Haisty WK; Bailey JR; Roelke M; Simonson J; Gerritse B; Englund J; Compton SJ;
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Apr; 29(4):406-12. PubMed ID: 16650270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved cardiac function and quality of life following upgrade to dual chamber pacing after long-term ventricular stimulation.
    Höijer CJ; Brandt J; Willenheimer R; Juul-Möller S; Boström PA
    Eur Heart J; 2002 Mar; 23(6):490-7. PubMed ID: 11863352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of a pacing mode preserving spontaneous AV conduction on ventricular pacing burden and atrial arrhythmias.
    Rey JL; Quenum S; Hero M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 May; 35(5):580-5. PubMed ID: 22339661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic and dual-site atrial pacing in the prevention of atrial fibrillation: The STimolazione Atrial DInamica Multisito (STADIM) Study.
    De Simone A; Senatore G; Donnici G; Turco P; Romano E; Gazzola C; Stabile G
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jan; 30 Suppl 1():S71-4. PubMed ID: 17302722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction.
    Sweeney MO; Hellkamp AS; Ellenbogen KA; Greenspon AJ; Freedman RA; Lee KL; Lamas GA;
    Circulation; 2003 Jun; 107(23):2932-7. PubMed ID: 12782566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of PR interval and pacing mode on persistent atrial fibrillation incidence in dual chamber pacemaker patients: a sub-study of the international randomized MINERVA trial.
    Boriani G; Pieragnoli P; Botto GL; Puererfellner H; Mont L; Ziacchi M; Manolis AS; Gulizia M; Tukkie R; Landolina M; Ricciardi G; Cicconelli M; Grammatico A; Biffi M
    Europace; 2019 Apr; 21(4):636-644. PubMed ID: 30649270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Atrial antitachycardia pacing and managed ventricular pacing in bradycardia patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial tachyarrhythmias: the MINERVA randomized multicentre international trial.
    Boriani G; Tukkie R; Manolis AS; Mont L; Pürerfellner H; Santini M; Inama G; Serra P; de Sousa J; Botto GL; Mangoni L; Grammatico A; Padeletti L;
    Eur Heart J; 2014 Sep; 35(35):2352-62. PubMed ID: 24771721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimizing ventricular pacing to reduce atrial fibrillation in sinus-node disease.
    Sweeney MO; Bank AJ; Nsah E; Koullick M; Zeng QC; Hettrick D; Sheldon T; Lamas GA;
    N Engl J Med; 2007 Sep; 357(10):1000-8. PubMed ID: 17804844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ventricular pacing vs dual chamber pacing in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation after atrioventricular node ablation: open randomized study.
    Petrac D; Radić B; Radeljić V; Hamel D; Filipović J
    Croat Med J; 2005 Dec; 46(6):922-8. PubMed ID: 16342345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The reverse mode switch algorithm: how well does it work?
    Akerström F; Arias MA; Pachón M; Puchol A; Jiménez-López J; Rodríguez-Padial L
    Heart Rhythm; 2013 Aug; 10(8):1146-52. PubMed ID: 23732226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality of life and clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with ventricular pacing as compared with dual-chamber pacing. Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly Investigators.
    Lamas GA; Orav EJ; Stambler BS; Ellenbogen KA; Sgarbossa EB; Huang SK; Marinchak RA; Estes NA; Mitchell GF; Lieberman EH; Mangione CM; Goldman L
    N Engl J Med; 1998 Apr; 338(16):1097-104. PubMed ID: 9545357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.