These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2204087)

  • 1. [Dimensional accuracy of partially edentulous arch in relation to impression material].
    Biffar R; Pfaller I
    Quintessenz; 1990 Jun; 41(6):1047-55. PubMed ID: 2204087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The altered cast impression technique: anatomic and functional considerations.
    Stillwell KD
    Todays FDA; 2009 Aug; 21(8):19-21, 23. PubMed ID: 19728461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dual-arch impressions as a diagnostic aid--a case report.
    Mizrahi B
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1996 Jan; 51(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 9461891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impression technique for partially edentulous patients.
    Nissan J; Barnea E; Krauze E; Assif D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):103-4. PubMed ID: 12239486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Studies on the use of alginate impression material and the dependence of the impression result on various conditions of processing. 3. Dimensional accuracy].
    Welker D
    Stomatol DDR; 1974 Jun; 24(6):390-400. PubMed ID: 4605968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Shreinemakers's method in bite registration of toothless lower arch].
    Doual ; Hannebique ; Jonas
    Rev Stomatoodontol Nord Fr; 1972; 27(105):43-6. PubMed ID: 4565593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictable definitive impressions for multiple indirect restorations using a modified putty and wash impression procedure.
    Leong EW; Cheng AC; Khin NT; Lee H; Leong DJ
    Singapore Dent J; 2007 Dec; 29(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 18472530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A double alginate mandibular impression technique.
    Thomas CJ
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1979 Nov; 34(11):781-2. PubMed ID: 399394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A historical review of hydrocolloids and an investigation of the dimensional accuracy of the new alginates for crown and bridge impressions when using stock trays.
    Hansson O; Eklund J
    Swed Dent J; 1984; 8(2):81-95. PubMed ID: 6377548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays.
    Kang AH; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Wataha JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 19410067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A combined impression technique for a partial implant-supported fixed-detachable restoration.
    Kohavi D
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Mar; 28(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 9452684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An alternative and simplified technique for the impression of completely edentulous ridges.
    Carreiro Ada F; de Torres EM; Souza AA; Ribeiro RF
    Gen Dent; 2008; 56(2):158-9. PubMed ID: 18348373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of impression technique and material on the accuracy of multiple implant impressions.
    Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Balkenhol M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(4):299-301. PubMed ID: 18717085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material.
    Assif D; Nissan J; Varsano I; Singer A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(6):885-8. PubMed ID: 10612928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of lingual sulcus depth obtained with three impression materials.
    Jooste CH; Bradshaw D; Jooste N
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1987 May; 42(5):241-4. PubMed ID: 3313817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
    Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The dimensional accuracy of four impression techniques with the use of addition silicone impression materials.
    Al-Bakri IA; Hussey D; Al-Omari WM
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(2):29-33. PubMed ID: 17508620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs.
    Masri R; Driscoll CF; Burkhardt J; Von Fraunhofer A; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12237795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.