These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22042759)

  • 1. Near and far space: Understanding the neural mechanisms of spatial attention.
    Lane AR; Ball K; Smith DT; Schenk T; Ellison A
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2013 Feb; 34(2):356-66. PubMed ID: 22042759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Far-space neglect in conjunction but not feature search following transcranial magnetic stimulation over right posterior parietal cortex.
    Mahayana IT; Liu CL; Chang CF; Hung DL; Tzeng OJ; Juan CH; Muggleton NG
    J Neurophysiol; 2014 Feb; 111(4):705-14. PubMed ID: 24259544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dissociating the neural mechanisms of distance and spatial reference frames.
    Lane AR; Ball K; Ellison A
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():42-9. PubMed ID: 25541500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The involvement of posterior parietal cortex and frontal eye fields in spatially primed visual search.
    Lane AR; Smith DT; Schenk T; Ellison A
    Brain Stimul; 2012 Jan; 5(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 22037138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural interaction between spatial domain and spatial reference frame in parietal-occipital junction.
    Chen Q; Weidner R; Weiss PH; Marshall JC; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Nov; 24(11):2223-36. PubMed ID: 22721375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The precuneus and visuospatial attention in near and far space: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.
    Mahayana IT; Tcheang L; Chen CY; Juan CH; Muggleton NG
    Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(5):673-9. PubMed ID: 25112521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The contribution of the human PPC to the orienting of visuospatial attention during smooth pursuit.
    Drew AS; van Donkelaar P
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 May; 179(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 17221223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial neglect in near and far space investigated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Bjoertomt O; Cowey A; Walsh V
    Brain; 2002 Sep; 125(Pt 9):2012-22. PubMed ID: 12183347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Site-dependent effects of tDCS uncover dissociations in the communication network underlying the processing of visual search.
    Ball K; Lane AR; Smith DT; Ellison A
    Brain Stimul; 2013 Nov; 6(6):959-65. PubMed ID: 23849715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are action and perception in near and far space additive or interactive factors?
    Weiss PH; Marshall JC; Zilles K; Fink GR
    Neuroimage; 2003 Apr; 18(4):837-46. PubMed ID: 12725760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Influence of Alertness on the Spatial Deployment of Visual Attention is Mediated by the Excitability of the Posterior Parietal Cortices.
    Paladini RE; Müri RM; Meichtry J; Nef T; Mast FW; Mosimann UP; Nyffeler T; Cazzoli D
    Cereb Cortex; 2017 Jan; 27(1):233-243. PubMed ID: 28013233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: a physiological basis for clinical dissociations.
    Weiss PH; Marshall JC; Wunderlich G; Tellmann L; Halligan PW; Freund HJ; Zilles K; Fink GR
    Brain; 2000 Dec; 123 Pt 12():2531-41. PubMed ID: 11099454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acute visual neglect and extinction: distinct functional state of the visuospatial attention system.
    Umarova RM; Saur D; Kaller CP; Vry MS; Glauche V; Mader I; Hennig J; Weiller C
    Brain; 2011 Nov; 134(Pt 11):3310-25. PubMed ID: 21948940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visuospatial Asymmetries Arise from Differences in the Onset Time of Perceptual Evidence Accumulation.
    Newman DP; Loughnane GM; Kelly SP; O'Connell RG; Bellgrove MA
    J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(12):3378-3385. PubMed ID: 28242798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peripersonal and extrapersonal visuospatial neglect in different frames of reference: A brain lesion-symptom mapping study.
    Ten Brink AF; Biesbroek JM; Oort Q; Visser-Meily JMA; Nijboer TCW
    Behav Brain Res; 2019 Jan; 356():504-515. PubMed ID: 29940260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural mechanisms of visual attention: object-based selection of a region in space.
    Arrington CM; Carr TH; Mayer AR; Rao SM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2000; 12 Suppl 2():106-17. PubMed ID: 11506651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Occipital-parietal interactions during shifts of exogenous visuospatial attention: trial-dependent changes of effective connectivity.
    Indovina I; Macaluso E
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1477-86. PubMed ID: 15707797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual search patterns in neglect: comparison of peripersonal and extrapersonal space.
    Butler BC; Lawrence M; Eskes GA; Klein R
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):869-78. PubMed ID: 19154749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Near space functioning of the human angular and supramarginal gyri.
    Bjoertomt O; Cowey A; Walsh V
    J Neuropsychol; 2009 Mar; 3(Pt 1):31-43. PubMed ID: 19338715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The timing of the involvement of the frontal eye fields and posterior parietal cortex in visual search.
    Kalla R; Muggleton NG; Juan CH; Cowey A; Walsh V
    Neuroreport; 2008 Jul; 19(10):1067-71. PubMed ID: 18580581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.