These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22043149)
1. 3D whole-heart coronary MR angiography at 1.5T in healthy volunteers: comparison between unenhanced SSFP and Gd-enhanced FLASH sequences. Gweon HM; Kim SJ; Lee SM; Hong YJ; Kim TH Korean J Radiol; 2011; 12(6):679-85. PubMed ID: 22043149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Noncontrast 3D steady-state free-precession magnetic resonance angiography of the whole chest using nonselective radiofrequency excitation over a large field of view: comparison with single-phase 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Krishnam MS; Tomasian A; Deshpande V; Tran L; Laub G; Finn JP; Ruehm SG Invest Radiol; 2008 Jun; 43(6):411-20. PubMed ID: 18496046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast-enhanced whole-heart MR coronary angiography at 3.0 T using the intravascular contrast agent gadofosveset. Prompona M; Cyran C; Nikolaou K; Bauner K; Reiser M; Huber A Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):369-74. PubMed ID: 19554666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [MR coronary angiography with MS-325, a blood pool contrast agent: comparison of an inversion recovery steady-state free precession with an inversion recovery fast low angle shot sequence in volunteers]. Nassenstein K; Waltering KU; Eggebrecht H; Schlosser T; Hunold P; Barkhausen J Rofo; 2006 May; 178(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 16586314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 T: comparison with steady-state free precession technique at 1.5 T. Liu X; Bi X; Huang J; Jerecic R; Carr J; Li D Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):663-8. PubMed ID: 18708861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Noncontrast 3D steady state free precession magnetic resonance angiography of the thoracic central veins using nonselective radiofrequency excitation over a large field of view: initial experience. Tomasian A; Lohan DG; Laub G; Singhal A; Finn JP; Krishnam MS Invest Radiol; 2008 May; 43(5):306-13. PubMed ID: 18424951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced SSFP MR angiography compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR angiography for the assessment of thoracic aortic diseases. Krishnam MS; Tomasian A; Malik S; Desphande V; Laub G; Ruehm SG Eur Radiol; 2010 Jun; 20(6):1311-20. PubMed ID: 20013276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance coronary angiography: comparison between a Gd-BOPTA- and a Gd-DTPA-enhanced spoiled gradient-echo sequence and a non-contrast-enhanced steady-state free-precession sequence. Nassenstein K; Breuckmann F; Hunold P; Barkhausen J; Schlosser T Acta Radiol; 2009 May; 50(4):406-11. PubMed ID: 19308763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unenhanced Whole-Heart Coronary MRA: Prospective Intraindividual Comparison of 1.5-T SSFP and 3-T Dixon Water-Fat Separation GRE Methods Using Coronary Angiography as Reference. Tian D; Zhao SH; Wang Y; Lu HF; Chen YY; Guo JJ; Ma JY; Chen ZW; Zeng MS; Jin H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Aug; 219(2):199-211. PubMed ID: 35293232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Congenital heart disease in adults: Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of IR FLASH and IR SSFP MRA techniques using a blood pool contrast agent in the steady state and comparison to first pass MRA. Febbo JA; Galizia MS; Murphy IG; Popescu A; Bi X; Turin A; Collins J; Markl M; Edelman RR; Carr JC Eur J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 84(10):1921-9. PubMed ID: 26253499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary MRA using Gadofosveset 3.0 T versus 1.5 T. Prompona M; Cyran C; Nikolaou K; Bauner K; Reiser M; Huber A Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):862-70. PubMed ID: 20399687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional breathhold SSFP coronary MRA: a comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T. Bi X; Deshpande V; Simonetti O; Laub G; Li D J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Aug; 22(2):206-12. PubMed ID: 16028242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flow targeted 3D steady-state free-precession coronary MR angiography: comparison of three different imaging approaches. Katoh M; Spuentrup E; Stuber M; Buecker A; Manning WJ; Günther RW; Botnar RM Invest Radiol; 2009 Dec; 44(12):757-62. PubMed ID: 19858729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3.0-T whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography: comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadofosveset trisodium. Raman FS; Nacif MS; Cater G; Gai N; Jones J; Li D; Sibley CT; Liu S; Bluemke DA Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jun; 29(5):1085-94. PubMed ID: 23515949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Addition of gadolinium contrast to three-dimensional SSFP MR sequences improves the visibility of coronary artery anatomy in young children. Shen Q; Lin C; Yao Q; Wang J; Zhou J; He L; Chen G; Hu X Front Pediatr; 2023; 11():1159347. PubMed ID: 37215588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced three-dimensional pulmonary MR-angiography: 1.0 M gadobutrol vs. 0.5 M gadopentetate dimeglumine. Fink C; Bock M; Kiessling F; Lichy MP; Krissak R; Zuna I; Schmähl A; Delorme S; Kauczor HU J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Feb; 19(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 14745754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]