These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

419 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22044253)

  • 41. Ultra-Low Carbon Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants through Bio-Oil Co-Firing and Biochar Sequestration.
    Dang Q; Mba Wright M; Brown RC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Dec; 49(24):14688-95. PubMed ID: 26545153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The shadow price of substitutable sulfur in the US electric power plant: a distance function approach.
    Lee M
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Oct; 77(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 15993533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Near-term implications of a ban on new coal-fired power plants in the United States.
    Newcomer A; Apt J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jun; 43(11):3995-4001. PubMed ID: 19569321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Multi-objective optimization of coal-fired power units considering deep peaking regulation in China.
    Feng S; Zhang X; Zhang H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(4):10756-10774. PubMed ID: 36076139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Contribution of nitrogen oxide and sulfur dioxide exposure from power plant emissions on respiratory symptom and disease prevalence.
    Amster ED; Haim M; Dubnov J; Broday DM
    Environ Pollut; 2014 Mar; 186():20-8. PubMed ID: 24361356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Should a coal-fired power plant be replaced or retrofitted?
    Patiño-Echeverri D; Morel B; Apt J; Chen C
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Dec; 41(23):7980-6. PubMed ID: 18186326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. High-tech coal energy cheaper than Texas wind power.
    Cooney CM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Nov; 39(22):455A. PubMed ID: 16323744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Reassessing the Efficiency Penalty from Carbon Capture in Coal-Fired Power Plants.
    Supekar SD; Skerlos SJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 49(20):12576-84. PubMed ID: 26422409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Estimating the effect of air pollution from a coal-fired power station on the development of children's pulmonary function.
    Dubnov J; Barchana M; Rishpon S; Leventhal A; Segal I; Carel R; Portnov BA
    Environ Res; 2007 Jan; 103(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 16618483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Cost analysis of environmental protection price of coal-fired plants in China.
    Zhao Y; Zhang J; Wang Z
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 May; 27(15):18729-18742. PubMed ID: 32207022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Use of stationary and mobile measurements to study power plant emissions.
    Yao X; Lau NT; Fang M; Chan CK
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2006 Feb; 56(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 16568797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Modeling the effects of changes in new source review on national SO2 and NOx emissions from electricity-generating units.
    Evans DA; Hobbs BF; Oren C; Palmer KL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Jan; 42(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 18284129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Air quality and health benefits from potential coal power plant closures in Texas.
    Strasert B; Teh SC; Cohan DS
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2019 Mar; 69(3):333-350. PubMed ID: 30339492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Terrestrial carbon disturbance from mountaintop mining increases lifecycle emissions for clean coal.
    Fox JF; Campbell JE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Mar; 44(6):2144-9. PubMed ID: 20141186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Synergies of wind power and electrified space heating: case study for Beijing.
    Chen X; Lu X; McElroy MB; Nielsen CP; Kang C
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014; 48(3):2016-24. PubMed ID: 24383490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Opportunities for Decarbonizing Existing U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants via CO2 Capture, Utilization and Storage.
    Zhai H; Ou Y; Rubin ES
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):7571-9. PubMed ID: 26023722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Tackling air pollution and extreme climate changes in China: Implementing the Paris climate change agreement.
    Tambo E; Duo-Quan W; Zhou XN
    Environ Int; 2016 Oct; 95():152-6. PubMed ID: 27107974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Mitigation of air pollution and carbon footprint by energy conservation through CFLs: a case study.
    Wath SB; Majumdar D
    J Environ Sci Eng; 2011 Jan; 53(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 22324148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The climate impacts of bioenergy systems depend on market and regulatory policy contexts.
    Lemoine DM; Plevin RJ; Cohn AS; Jones AD; Brandt AR; Vergara SE; Kammen DM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Oct; 44(19):7347-50. PubMed ID: 20873876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cost of wind energy: comparing distant wind resources to local resources in the midwestern United States.
    Hoppock DC; Patiño-Echeverri D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Nov; 44(22):8758-65. PubMed ID: 20931984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.