These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22044678)

  • 1. Land trust evaluation of progress toward conservation goals.
    Alexander L; Hess GR
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Feb; 26(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 22044678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wildlife Conservation and Private Protected Areas: The Discrepancy Between Land Trust Mission Statements and Their Perceptions.
    Dayer AA; Rodewald AD; Stedman RC; Cosbar EA; Wood EM
    Environ Manage; 2016 Aug; 58(2):359-64. PubMed ID: 27263099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conservation development practices, extent, and land-use effects in the United States.
    Milder JC; Clark S
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Aug; 25(4):697-707. PubMed ID: 21658127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating the effect of protected lands on the development and conservation of their surroundings.
    McDonald RI; Yuan-Farrell C; Fievet C; Moeller M; Kareiva P; Foster D; Gragson T; Kinzig A; Kuby L; Redman C
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1526-36. PubMed ID: 18173476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating areas of high conservation value in Western Oregon with a decision-support model.
    Staus NL; Strittholt JR; Dellasala DA
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Jun; 24(3):711-20. PubMed ID: 20184658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An index of risk as a measure of biodiversity conservation achieved through land reform.
    Walker S; Price R; Stephens RT
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Feb; 22(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 18254852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating private land conservation in the Cape Lowlands, South Africa.
    Von Hase A; Rouget M; Cowling RM
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1182-9. PubMed ID: 21182668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem function through limited development: an empirical evaluation.
    Milder JC; Lassoie JP; Bedford BL
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Feb; 22(1):70-9. PubMed ID: 18254854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity.
    Dearborn DC; Kark S
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 19775276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A micro case study of the legal and administrative arrangements for river health in the Kangaroo River (NSW).
    Mooney C; Farrier D
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(11):161-8. PubMed ID: 12171348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conservation planning with multiple organizations and objectives.
    Bode M; Probert W; Turner WR; Wilson KA; Venter O
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Apr; 25(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 21129029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Land development in and around protected areas at the wilderness frontier.
    Leroux SJ; Kerr JT
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Feb; 27(1):166-76. PubMed ID: 23088594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increasing the impact of conservation projects.
    Dietz LA; Brown M; Swaminathan V
    Am J Primatol; 2010 May; 72(5):425-40. PubMed ID: 20095023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the effectiveness of reserve acquisition programs in protecting rare and threatened species.
    Turner WR; Wilcove DS; Swain HM
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):1657-69. PubMed ID: 17181801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges.
    Dudgeon D; Arthington AH; Gessner MO; Kawabata Z; Knowler DJ; Lévêque C; Naiman RJ; Prieur-Richard AH; Soto D; Stiassny ML; Sullivan CA
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2006 May; 81(2):163-82. PubMed ID: 16336747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Local land-use planning to conserve biodiversity: planners' perspectives on what works.
    Stokes DL; Hanson MF; Oaks DD; Straub JE; Ponio AV
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):450-60. PubMed ID: 19906063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the ecological and social benefits of private land conservation in Colorado.
    Wallace GN; Theobald DM; Ernst T; King K
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):284-96. PubMed ID: 18402582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing conservation opportunity on private land: socio-economic, behavioral, and spatial dimensions.
    Raymond CM; Brown G
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 92(10):2513-23. PubMed ID: 21664035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Designing cost-effective payments for conservation measures to generate spatiotemporal habitat heterogeneity.
    Drechsler M; Johst K; Ohl C; Wätzold F
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1475-86. PubMed ID: 18173471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources: clean land, water, and air for healthy people and communities.
    Riegel LD; Wakild C; Boothe L; Hildebrandt HJ; Nicholson B
    N C Med J; 2012; 73(4):281-5. PubMed ID: 23033715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.