BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

460 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22044773)

  • 1. Polymerization profile analysis of resin composite dental restorative materials in real time.
    Naoum SJ; Ellakwa A; Morgan L; White K; Martin FE; Lee IB
    J Dent; 2012 Jan; 40(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 22044773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology.
    Ilie N; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2011 Apr; 27(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 21194743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Polymerization stress, shrinkage and elastic modulus of current low-shrinkage restorative composites.
    Boaro LC; Gonçalves F; Guimarães TC; Ferracane JL; Versluis A; Braga RR
    Dent Mater; 2010 Dec; 26(12):1144-50. PubMed ID: 20832850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of shrinkage strain, modulus, and instrument compliance on polymerization shrinkage stress of light-cured composites during the initial curing stage.
    Min SH; Ferracane J; Lee IB
    Dent Mater; 2010 Oct; 26(10):1024-33. PubMed ID: 20684977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Alternative methods for determining shrinkage in restorative resin composites.
    de Melo Monteiro GQ; Montes MA; Rolim TV; de Oliveira Mota CC; de Barros Correia Kyotoku B; Gomes AS; de Freitas AZ
    Dent Mater; 2011 Aug; 27(8):e176-85. PubMed ID: 21612818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methacrylate- and silorane-based composite restorations: hardness, depth of cure and interfacial gap formation as a function of the energy dose.
    D'Alpino PH; Bechtold J; dos Santos PJ; Alonso RC; Di Hipólito V; Silikas N; Rodrigues FP
    Dent Mater; 2011 Nov; 27(11):1162-9. PubMed ID: 21925724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigating filler morphology and mechanical properties of new low-shrinkage resin composite types.
    Leprince J; Palin WM; Mullier T; Devaux J; Vreven J; Leloup G
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 May; 37(5):364-76. PubMed ID: 20202096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contraction stress of low-shrinkage composite materials assessed with different testing systems.
    Marchesi G; Breschi L; Antoniolli F; Di Lenarda R; Ferracane J; Cadenaro M
    Dent Mater; 2010 Oct; 26(10):947-53. PubMed ID: 20566212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of layering methods, composite type, and flowable liner on the polymerization shrinkage stress of light cured composites.
    Kwon Y; Ferracane J; Lee IB
    Dent Mater; 2012 Jul; 28(7):801-9. PubMed ID: 22575738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of stepped light exposure on the volumetric polymerization shrinkage and bulk modulus of dental composites and an unfilled resin.
    Price RB; Rizkalla AS; Hall GC
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):176-80. PubMed ID: 11763926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Polymerization characteristics, flexural modulus and microleakage evaluation of silorane-based and methacrylate-based composites.
    Gao BT; Lin H; Han JM; Zheng G
    Am J Dent; 2011 Apr; 24(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 21698989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Macro-, micro- and nano-mechanical investigations on silorane and methacrylate-based composites.
    Ilie N; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jun; 25(6):810-9. PubMed ID: 19286247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Siloranes in dental composites.
    Weinmann W; Thalacker C; Guggenberger R
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jan; 21(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 15681004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of polymerization contraction stress of three composite resins.
    Cadenaro M; Biasotto M; Scuor N; Breschi L; Davidson CL; Di Lenarda R
    Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):681-5. PubMed ID: 17765300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of volumetric shrinkage and curing light intensity on proximal contact tightness of class II resin composite restorations: in vitro study.
    El-Shamy H; Saber MH; Dörfer CE; El-Badrawy W; Loomans BA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 22313267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new method to measure the polymerization shrinkage kinetics of composites using a particle tracking method with computer vision.
    Lee IB; Min SH; Seo DG
    Dent Mater; 2012 Feb; 28(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 22032934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Properties of silorane-based dental resins and composites containing a stress-reducing monomer.
    Eick JD; Kotha SP; Chappelow CC; Kilway KV; Giese GJ; Glaros AG; Pinzino CS
    Dent Mater; 2007 Aug; 23(8):1011-7. PubMed ID: 17097138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Post-gel polymerization contraction of "low shrinkage" composite restoratives.
    Yap AU; Soh MS
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):182-7. PubMed ID: 15088730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does a low-shrinking composite induce less stress at the adhesive interface?
    Van Ende A; De Munck J; Mine A; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    Dent Mater; 2010 Mar; 26(3):215-22. PubMed ID: 19906417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.