195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22044976)
1. A randomized comparison of laparoscopic, magnetically anchored, and flexible endoscopic cameras in performance and workload between laparoscopic and single-incision surgery.
Arain NA; Cadeddu JA; Best SL; Roshek T; Chang V; Hogg DC; Bergs R; Fernandez R; Webb EM; Scott DJ
Surg Endosc; 2012 Apr; 26(4):1170-80. PubMed ID: 22044976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized comparison of laparoscopic, flexible endoscopic, and wired and wireless magnetic cameras on ex vivo and in vivo NOTES surgical performance.
Chang VC; Tang SJ; Swain CP; Bergs R; Paramo J; Hogg DC; Fernandez R; Cadeddu JA; Scott DJ
Surg Innov; 2013 Aug; 20(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 23060531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetically anchored camera and percutaneous instruments maintain triangulation and improve cosmesis compared with single-site and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Arain NA; Rondon L; Hogg DC; Cadeddu JA; Bergs R; Fernandez R; Scott DJ
Surg Endosc; 2012 Dec; 26(12):3457-66. PubMed ID: 22648118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetically anchored cautery dissector improves triangulation, depth perception, and workload during single-site laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Arain NA; Cadeddu JA; Hogg DC; Bergs R; Fernandez R; Scott DJ
J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 Sep; 16(9):1807-13. PubMed ID: 22744636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) in vivo suturing using a magnetic anchoring and guidance system (MAGS) camera in a porcine model: impact on ergonomics and workload.
Yin G; Han WK; Faddegon S; Tan YK; Liu ZW; Olweny EO; Scott DJ; Cadeddu JA
Urology; 2013 Jan; 81(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 23153954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between magnetic anchoring and guidance system camera-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy and conventional laparoendoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy in a porcine model: focus on ergonomics and workload profiles.
Han WK; Tan YK; Olweny EO; Yin G; Liu ZW; Faddegon S; Scott DJ; Cadeddu JA
J Endourol; 2013 Apr; 27(4):490-6. PubMed ID: 23067039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS™) versus standard laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of performance using a surgical simulator.
Santos BF; Enter D; Soper NJ; Hungness ES
Surg Endosc; 2011 Feb; 25(2):483-90. PubMed ID: 20585958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Solo surgeon laparo-endoscopic single site nephrectomy facilitated by new generation magnetically anchored and guided systems camera.
Best SL; Bergs R; Scott DJ; Fernandez R; Mashaud LB; Cadeddu JA
J Endourol; 2012 Mar; 26(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 22191662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between single-site access (SSA) devices and an independent-port SSA approach.
Schill MR; Varela JE; Frisella MM; Brunt LM
Surg Endosc; 2012 Mar; 26(3):714-21. PubMed ID: 21993938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is associated with poorer performance and increased surgeon workload compared with standard laparoscopy.
Montero PN; Acker CE; Heniford BT; Stefanidis D
Am Surg; 2011 Jan; 77(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 21396310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The trade-off between flexibility and maneuverability: task performance with articulating laparoscopic instruments.
Martinec DV; Gatta P; Zheng B; Denk PM; Swanström LL
Surg Endosc; 2009 Dec; 23(12):2697-701. PubMed ID: 19343420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgeon workload and motion efficiency with robot and human laparoscopic camera control.
Kondraske GV; Hamilton EC; Scott DJ; Fischer CA; Tesfay ST; Taneja R; Brown RJ; Jones DB
Surg Endosc; 2002 Nov; 16(11):1523-7. PubMed ID: 12098023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks.
Storz P; Buess GF; Kunert W; Kirschniak A
Surg Endosc; 2012 May; 26(5):1454-60. PubMed ID: 22179446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of face-mounted binocular video display for laparoscopy: outcomes of psychometric skills testing and surgeon satisfaction.
Minnich DJ; Schell SR
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2003 Oct; 13(5):333-8. PubMed ID: 14617395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantifying mental workloads of surgeons performing natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures.
Zheng B; Rieder E; Cassera MA; Martinec DV; Lee G; Panton ON; Park A; Swanström LL
Surg Endosc; 2012 May; 26(5):1352-8. PubMed ID: 22052427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of training and instrument type on performance in single-incision laparoscopy: results of a randomized comparison using a surgical simulator.
Santos BF; Reif TJ; Soper NJ; Hungness ES
Surg Endosc; 2011 Dec; 25(12):3798-804. PubMed ID: 21647813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of surgical performance with standard rigid and flexible-tip laparoscopes.
Perrone JM; Ames CD; Yan Y; Landman J
Surg Endosc; 2005 Oct; 19(10):1325-8. PubMed ID: 16228857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimizing laparoscopic task efficiency: the role of camera and monitor positions.
Haveran LA; Novitsky YW; Czerniach DR; Kaban GK; Taylor M; Gallagher-Dorval K; Schmidt R; Kelly JJ; Litwin DE
Surg Endosc; 2007 Jun; 21(6):980-4. PubMed ID: 17436042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An ergonomic analysis of the effects of camera rotation on laparoscopic performance.
Gallagher AG; Al-Akash M; Seymour NE; Satava RM
Surg Endosc; 2009 Dec; 23(12):2684-91. PubMed ID: 19067048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Construct and face validity and task workload for laparoscopic camera navigation: virtual reality versus videotrainer systems at the SAGES Learning Center.
Stefanidis D; Haluck R; Pham T; Dunne JB; Reinke T; Markley S; Korndorffer JR; Arellano P; Jones DB; Scott DJ
Surg Endosc; 2007 Jul; 21(7):1158-64. PubMed ID: 17149551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
