These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Augmented blood pressure measurement through the noninvasive estimation of physiological arterial pressure variability. Soueidan K; Chen S; Dajani HR; Bolic M; Groza V Physiol Meas; 2012 Jun; 33(6):881-99. PubMed ID: 22551623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Can a simulator that regenerates physiological waveforms evaluate oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure devices? Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 16534407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. LAM 100/Marshall F-88: accuracy and precision of a new device for discontinuous finger blood pressure measurement. Veerman DP; Lenders JW; Thien T; van Montfrans GA J Hum Hypertens; 1993 Apr; 7(2):113-5. PubMed ID: 8510082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements. Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of the Microlife large-extra large-sized cuff (32-52 cm) coupled to an automatic oscillometric device. Masiero S; Saladini F; Benetti E; Palatini P Blood Press Monit; 2011 Apr; 16(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 21346560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The agreement between oscillometric and intra-arterial technique for blood pressure monitoring in the lower extremities for infants and toddlers undergoing aortic coarctation repair. Peng ZZ; Zhang MZ; Sun Y; Bai J; Gu HB; Liu PP; Li M; Cai MH Paediatr Anaesth; 2016 Nov; 26(11):1091-1096. PubMed ID: 27543444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Validation of the Omron M7 (HEM-780-E) oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol. Coleman A; Steel S; Freeman P; de Greeff A; Shennan A Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb; 13(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 18199924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accuracy and 'range of uncertainty' of oscillometric blood pressure monitors around the upper arm and the wrist. Dieterle T; Battegay E; Bucheli B; Martina B Blood Press Monit; 1998; 3(6):339-46. PubMed ID: 10212375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Simultaneous validation of the SunTech CT40 automated blood pressure measurement device by the 1993 British Hypertension Society protocol and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/International Organization for Standardization 81060-2: 2013 standard. Polo Friz H; Punzi V; Petri F; Orlandi R; Maggiolini D; Polo Friz M; Primitz L; Vighi G Blood Press Monit; 2017 Oct; 22(5):298-301. PubMed ID: 28763332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Validity and reliability of 24h blood pressure monitoring in children and adolescents using a portable, oscillometric device. Bald M; Kubel S; Rascher W J Hum Hypertens; 1994 May; 8(5):363-6. PubMed ID: 7695689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Validation of the SAW-102 wrist home blood pressure monitor according to the protocols of the British Hypertension Society, the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, and the European Society of Hypertension. Zaetta V; Longo D; Perkovic D; Perfetti P; Gabrieli A; Pratticò F; Winnicki M Blood Press Monit; 2009 Feb; 14(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 19262198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children. Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical blood pressure measurement verification when comparing a Tensoval duo control device with a mercury sphygmomanometer in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation. Farsky S; Benova K; Krausova D; Sirotiaková J; Vysocanova P Blood Press Monit; 2011 Oct; 16(5):252-7. PubMed ID: 21914986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Transmission of calibration errors (input) by generalized transfer functions to the aortic pressures (output) at different hemodynamic states. Papaioannou TG; Lekakis JP; Karatzis EN; Papamichael CM; Stamatelopoulos KS; Protogerou AD; Mavrikakis M; Stefanadis C Int J Cardiol; 2006 Jun; 110(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 16229910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quantification of the calibration error in the transfer function-derived central aortic blood pressures. Shih YT; Cheng HM; Sung SH; Hu WC; Chen CH Am J Hypertens; 2011 Dec; 24(12):1312-7. PubMed ID: 21850061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accuracy of the BP A100 blood pressure measuring device coupled with a single cuff with standard-size bladder over a wide range of arm circumferences. Bonso E; Dorigatti F; Palatini P Blood Press Monit; 2009 Oct; 14(5):216-9. PubMed ID: 19734782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical validation of an automatic device measuring blood pressure in the fingers. Arosio E; Zannoni M Panminerva Med; 1999 Jun; 41(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 10479914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]