157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22045953)
1. Automatic vs semi-automatic global cardiac function assessment using 64-row CT.
Greupner J; Zimmermann E; Hamm B; Dewey M
Br J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 85(1015):e243-53. PubMed ID: 22045953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of (semi-)automatic and manually adjusted measurements of left ventricular function in dual source computed tomography using three different software tools.
de Jonge GJ; van Ooijen PM; Overbosch J; Gueorguieva AL; Janssen-van der Weide MC; Oudkerk M
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Jul; 27(6):787-94. PubMed ID: 20972707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Left ventricular functional parameters using ECG-gated multidetector spiral CT in comparison with invasive ventriculography].
Heuschmid M; Küttner A; Schröder S; Trebar B; Burgstahler C; Mahnken A; Niethammer M; Trabold T; Kopp AF; Claussen CD
Rofo; 2003 Oct; 175(10):1349-54. PubMed ID: 14556103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of manual, semi- and fully automated heart segmentation for assessing global left ventricular function in multidetector computed tomography.
Plumhans C; Keil S; Ocklenburg C; Mühlenbruch G; Behrendt FF; Günther RW; Mahnken AH
Invest Radiol; 2009 Aug; 44(8):476-82. PubMed ID: 19561515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Traditional, forgotten and new left ventricular systolic function parameters on a 64-row multidetector cardiac computed tomography: a reproducibility study.
Sosnowski M; Młynarski R; Tendera M
Cardiol J; 2013; 20(4):385-93. PubMed ID: 23913457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Left ventricular ejection fraction using 64-slice CT coronary angiography and new evaluation software: initial experience.
Krishnam MS; Tomasian A; Iv M; Ruehm SG; Saleh R; Panknin C; Goldin JG
Br J Radiol; 2008 Jun; 81(966):450-5. PubMed ID: 18347027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproducibility of Semi-automated Three-dimensional Volumetric Analysis using Cardiac Computed Tomography in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device.
Gill GS; Weissman G; Meirovich YF; Medvedofsky D; Mohammed SF; Waksman R; Garcia-Garcia HM
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 May; 20(5):381-386. PubMed ID: 30772192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Informatics in radiology: postprocessing pitfalls in using CT for automatic and semiautomatic determination of global left ventricular function.
van Ooijen PM; de Jonge GJ; Oudkerk M
Radiographics; 2012; 32(2):589-99. PubMed ID: 22323618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of global left ventricular systolic function with multidetector CT and 2D echocardiography: a comparison between reconstructions of 1-mm and 2-mm slice thickness at multidetector CT.
Vural M; Uçar O; Selvi NA; Paşaoğlu L; Gürbüz MO; Ciçekçioğlu H; Aydoğdu S; Koparal S
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2010 Sep; 16(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 20635319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Semiautomatic three-dimensional CT ventricular volumetry in patients with congenital heart disease: agreement between two methods with different user interaction.
Goo HW; Park SH
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31 Suppl 2():223-32. PubMed ID: 26319216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of global left ventricular function using 20 phases with 10-phase reconstructions in multidetector-row computed tomography.
Ko YJ; Kim SS; Park WJ; Jeong JO; Ko SM
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Mar; 28(3):603-11. PubMed ID: 21359518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function with a 16-slice spiral-CT using two different software tools for quantitative functional analysis and qualitative evaluation of wall motion changes in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging].
Koch K; Oellig F; Kunz P; Bender P; Oberholzer K; Mildenberger P; Hake U; Kreitner KF; Thelen M
Rofo; 2004 Dec; 176(12):1786-93. PubMed ID: 15573290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of left ventricular function and volume in patients undergoing 128-slice coronary CT angiography with ECG-based maximum tube current modulation: a comparison with echocardiography.
Lim SJ; Choo KS; Park YH; Kim JS; Kim JH; Chun KJ; Jeong DW
Korean J Radiol; 2011; 12(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 21430931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic accuracy of semi-automatic quantitative metrics as an alternative to expert reading of CT myocardial perfusion in the CORE320 study.
Ostovaneh MR; Vavere AL; Mehra VC; Kofoed KF; Matheson MB; Arbab-Zadeh A; Fujisawa Y; Schuijf JD; Rochitte CE; Scholte AJ; Kitagawa K; Dewey M; Cox C; DiCarli MF; George RT; Lima JAC
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(3):212-219. PubMed ID: 29730016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of left ventricular function and mass in patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography using 64-detector-row CT: comparison to magnetic resonance imaging.
Schlosser T; Mohrs OK; Magedanz A; Voigtländer T; Schmermund A; Barkhausen J
Acta Radiol; 2007 Feb; 48(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 17325922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving the reproducibility of MR-derived left ventricular volume and function measurements with a semi-automatic threshold-based segmentation algorithm.
Jaspers K; Freling HG; van Wijk K; Romijn EI; Greuter MJ; Willems TP
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Mar; 29(3):617-23. PubMed ID: 23053857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of global and regional cardiac function using 64-slice computed tomography: a comparison study with echocardiography, gated-SPECT and cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Wu YW; Tadamura E; Yamamuro M; Kanao S; Okayama S; Ozasa N; Toma M; Kimura T; Komeda M; Togashi K
Int J Cardiol; 2008 Aug; 128(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 17692410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of Coronary Plaque Detection and Assessment of Interobserver Agreement for Plaque Quantification Using Automatic Coronary Plaque Analysis Software on Coronary CT Angiography.
Laqmani A; Klink T; Quitzke M; Creder DD; Adam G; Lund G
Rofo; 2016 Oct; 188(10):933-9. PubMed ID: 27433968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative right and left ventricular functional analysis during gated whole-chest MDCT: a feasibility study comparing automatic segmentation to semi-manual contouring.
Coche E; Walker MJ; Zech F; de Crombrugghe R; Vlassenbroek A
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jun; 74(3):e138-43. PubMed ID: 19540692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT evaluation prior to transapical aortic valve replacement: semi-automatic versus manual image segmentation.
Foldyna B; Jungert C; Luecke C; von Aspern K; Boehmer-Lasthaus S; Rueth EM; Grothoff M; Nitzsche S; Gutberlet M; Mohr FW; Lehmkuhl L
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Aug; 31(6):1233-42. PubMed ID: 25893746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
