362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22046693)
1. Endoflas, zinc oxide eugenol and metapex as root canal filling materials in primary molars--a comparative clinical study.
Subramaniam P; Gilhotra K
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2011; 35(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 22046693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpectomies using three root canal filling materials: an in-vivo study.
Ramar K; Mungara J
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 20215668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Zinc oxide eugenol and Endoflas pulpectomy in primary molars: 24-month clinical and radiographic evaluation.
Pandranki J; V Vanga NR; Chandrabhatla SK
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2018; 36(2):173-180. PubMed ID: 29970635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of endoflas and zinc oxide eugenol as root canal filling materials in primary dentition.
Rewal N; Thakur AS; Sachdev V; Mahajan N
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2014; 32(4):317-21. PubMed ID: 25231040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A clinical and radiographic study of four different root canal fillings in primary molars.
Al-Ostwani AO; Al-Monaqel BM; Al-Tinawi MK
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 26838149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Degradation evaluation and success of pulpectomy with a modified primary root canal filling in primary molars].
Chen XX; Lin BC; Zhong J; Ge LH
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Jun; 47(3):529-35. PubMed ID: 26080888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Success rate of root canal treatment in primary molars.
Moskovitz M; Sammara E; Holan G
J Dent; 2005 Jan; 33(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 15652167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of zinc oxide eugenol and metapex in root canal treatment of primary teeth.
Gupta S; Das G
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2011; 29(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 21985878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste and zinc oxide eugenol as root filling materials for pulpectomy in primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Najjar RS; Alamoudi NM; El-Housseiny AA; Al Tuwirqi AA; Sabbagh HJ
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2019 Jun; 5(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 31249711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An in vitro comparison of three delivery techniques for obturation of root canals in primary molars.
Walia T; Ghanbari AH; Mathew S; Ziadlou AH
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2017 Feb; 18(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 27885586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpectomy in primary teeth: a 18-months clinical randomized controlled trial.
Chen X; Liu X; Zhong J
Head Face Med; 2017 Oct; 13(1):12. PubMed ID: 29073902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Prevention of endodontic interappointment emergencies after one-visit root canal therapy on deciduous teeth with METAPEX].
Zhong ZQ; Han JL; He H
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2009 Oct; 18(5):486-8. PubMed ID: 19907854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of various root canal filling materials along with aloevera used in primary teeth: a microbiological study.
Kriplani R; Thosar N; Baliga MS; Kulkarni P; Shah N; Yeluri R
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2013; 37(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 23855169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical efficacy of various root canal obturating methods in primary teeth: a comparative study.
Grover R; Mehra M; Pandit IK; Srivastava N; Gugnani N; Gupta M
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jun; 14(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 23758458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An in vitro evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of primary root canal filling materials.
Hegde S; Lala PK; Dinesh RB; Shubha AB
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2012; 37(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 23342568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tamponade effect of resorbable biological barrier in quality of obturation in primary molar.
Kakade A; Shetty H; Santosh A; Mali S; Badnaware S; Deshmukh B; Banthiya K
J Investig Clin Dent; 2019 Nov; 10(4):e12468. PubMed ID: 31544328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative Evaluation of Postoperative Pain in Primary Teeth Obturated With Zinc Oxide Eugenol versus Metapex: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Paranna S; Biradar J; Semwal M; Patil K; Suradkar S; Shinde S
Mymensingh Med J; 2022 Oct; 31(4):1148-1152. PubMed ID: 36189565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative evaluation of bactericidal potential of four root canal filling materials against microflora of infected non-vital primary teeth.
Harini Priya M; Bhat SS; Sundeep Hegde K
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 21189760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Degree of root resorption after root canal treatment with iodoform-containing filling material in primary molars.
Moskovitz M; Tickotsky N; Ashkar H; Holan G
Quintessence Int; 2012 May; 43(5):361-8. PubMed ID: 22536587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of calcium hydroxide and zinc oxide eugenol as root canal filling materials for primary molars: a clinical and radiographic study.
Nadkarni U; Damle SG
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2000 Mar; 18(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 11323998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
