186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22047361)
1. Image quality improvement in megavoltage cone beam CT using an imaging beam line and a sintered pixelated array system.
Breitbach EK; Maltz JS; Gangadharan B; Bani-Hashemi A; Anderson CM; Bhatia SK; Stiles J; Edwards DS; Flynn RT
Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):5969-79. PubMed ID: 22047361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric characterization and application of an imaging beam line with a carbon electron target for megavoltage cone beam computed tomography.
Flynn RT; Hartmann J; Bani-Hashemi A; Nixon E; Alfredo R; Siochi C; Pennington EC; Bayouth JE
Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):2181-92. PubMed ID: 19610307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of patient megavoltage cone beam CT images acquired with an unflattened beam from a carbon target and a flattened treatment beam.
Faddegon BA; Aubin M; Bani-Hashemi A; Gangadharan B; Gottschalk AR; Morin O; Sawkey D; Wu V; Yom SS
Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1737-41. PubMed ID: 20443494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Physical performance and image optimization of megavoltage cone-beam CT.
Morin O; Aubry JF; Aubin M; Chen J; Descovich M; Hashemi AB; Pouliot J
Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1421-32. PubMed ID: 19472649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low dose megavoltage cone beam computed tomography with an unflattened 4 MV beam from a carbon target.
Faddegon BA; Wu V; Pouliot J; Gangadharan B; Bani-Hashemi A
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5777-86. PubMed ID: 19175135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance characteristics of a novel megavoltage cone-beam-computed tomography device.
Fast MF; Koenig T; Oelfke U; Nill S
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Feb; 57(3):N15-24. PubMed ID: 22251668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image quality of an investigational imaging panel for use with the imaging beam line cone-beam CT.
Beltran C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 13(1):3607. PubMed ID: 22231211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Image quality & dosimetric property of an investigational imaging beam line MV-CBCT.
Beltran C; Lukose R; Gangadharan B; Bani-Hashemi A; Faddegon BA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 10(3):37-48. PubMed ID: 19692984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low-dose megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography using a novel multi-layer imager (MLI).
Myronakis M; Huber P; Lehmann M; Fueglistaller R; Jacobson M; Hu YH; Baturin P; Wang A; Shi M; Harris T; Morf D; Berbeco R
Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1827-1835. PubMed ID: 31930516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved image quality of cone beam CT scans for radiotherapy image guidance using fiber-interspaced antiscatter grid.
Stankovic U; van Herk M; Ploeger LS; Sonke JJ
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061910. PubMed ID: 24877821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low-dose 2.5 MV cone-beam computed tomography with thick CsI flat-panel imager.
Tang G; Moussot C; Morf D; Seppi E; Amols H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):235-245. PubMed ID: 27455493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient dose considerations for routine megavoltage cone-beam CT imaging.
Morin O; Gillis A; Descovich M; Chen J; Aubin M; Aubry JF; Chen H; Gottschalk AR; Xia P; Pouliot J
Med Phys; 2007 May; 34(5):1819-27. PubMed ID: 17555263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Megavoltage planar and cone-beam imaging with low-Z targets: dependence of image quality improvement on beam energy and patient separation.
Robar JL; Connell T; Huang W; Kelly RG
Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):3955-63. PubMed ID: 19810468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterizing a novel scintillating glass for application to megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography.
Hu YH; Shedlock D; Wang A; Rottmann J; Baturin P; Myronakis M; Huber P; Fueglistaller R; Shi M; Morf D; Star-Lack J; Berbeco RI
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1323-1330. PubMed ID: 30586163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A piecewise-focused high DQE detector for MV imaging.
Star-Lack J; Shedlock D; Swahn D; Humber D; Wang A; Hirsh H; Zentai G; Sawkey D; Kruger I; Sun M; Abel E; Virshup G; Shin M; Fahrig R
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5084-99. PubMed ID: 26328960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cone-beam CT dose and imaging performance evaluation with a modular, multipurpose phantom.
Siewerdsen JH; Uneri A; Hernandez AM; Burkett GW; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):467-479. PubMed ID: 31808950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of antiscatter grids on soft-tissue detectability in cone-beam computed tomography with flat-panel detectors.
Siewerdsen JH; Moseley DJ; Bakhtiar B; Richard S; Jaffray DA
Med Phys; 2004 Dec; 31(12):3506-20. PubMed ID: 15651634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cone-beam breast computed tomography with a displaced flat panel detector array.
Mettivier G; Russo P; Lanconelli N; Meo SL
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2805-19. PubMed ID: 22559652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Dose delivered to the patient by megavoltage cone beam computed tomography imaging].
Isambert A; Ferreira IH; Bossi A; Beaudré A; Nicula LE; Lefkopoulos D
Cancer Radiother; 2009 Sep; 13(5):358-64. PubMed ID: 19640758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraoperative cone-beam CT for guidance of head and neck surgery: Assessment of dose and image quality using a C-arm prototype.
Daly MJ; Siewerdsen JH; Moseley DJ; Jaffray DA; Irish JC
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3767-80. PubMed ID: 17089842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
