261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22047384)
1. Optimization of phosphor-based detector design for oblique x-ray incidence in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Acciavatti RJ; Maidment AD
Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6188. PubMed ID: 22047384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nonstationary model of oblique x-ray incidence in amorphous selenium detectors: II. Transfer functions.
Acciavatti RJ; Maidment ADA
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):505-516. PubMed ID: 30488455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of amorphous selenium detector thickness on dual-energy digital breast imaging.
Hu YH; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111904. PubMed ID: 25370637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Amorphous In-Ga-Zn-O thin-film transistor active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Zhao C; Kanicki J
Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091902. PubMed ID: 25186389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional cascaded system analysis of a 50 µm pixel pitch wafer-scale CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray detector for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Zhao C; Vassiljev N; Konstantinidis AC; Speller RD; Kanicki J
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1994-2017. PubMed ID: 28072394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cascaded systems analysis of shift-variant image quality in slit-scanning breast tomosynthesis.
Berggren K; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Fredenberg E
Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4392-4401. PubMed ID: 30091470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Segmented phosphors: MEMS-based high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging.
Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Li Y; Su Z; Wang Y; Yamamoto J; Zhao Q; Du H; Daniel J; Street R
Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):553-65. PubMed ID: 15789602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monte Carlo performance on the x-ray converter thickness in digital mammography using software breast models.
Liaparinos P; Bliznakova K
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6638-51. PubMed ID: 23127058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of CsI:Tl and Gd
Howansky A; Mishchenko A; Lubinsky AR; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):4857-4868. PubMed ID: 31461532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monte Carlo study on the imaging performance of powder Lu2SiO5:Ce phosphor screens under x-ray excitation: comparison with Gd2O2S:Tb screens.
Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS; Cavouras DA; Delis HB; Panayiotakis GS
Med Phys; 2007 May; 34(5):1724-33. PubMed ID: 17555254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative analysis of OTF, NPS, and DQE in energy integrating and photon counting digital x-ray detectors.
Acciavatti RJ; Maidment AD
Med Phys; 2010 Dec; 37(12):6480-95. PubMed ID: 21302803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of a developmental detector for digital mammography.
Williams MB; Simoni PU; Smilowitz L; Stanton M; Phillips W; Stewart A
Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2273-85. PubMed ID: 10587208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cascaded systems analysis of a-Se/a-Si and a-InGaZnO TFT passive and active pixel sensors for tomosynthesis.
Sengupta A; Zhao C; Konstantinidis A; Kanicki J
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(2):025012. PubMed ID: 30523916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
Boyce SJ; Samei E
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experimental validation of a three-dimensional linear system model for breast tomosynthesis.
Zhao B; Zhou J; Hu YH; Mertelmeier T; Ludwig J; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):240-51. PubMed ID: 19235392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative image quality measurements of a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
Olgar T; Kahn T; Gosch D
Rofo; 2013 Dec; 185(12):1188-94. PubMed ID: 23888475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional linear system analysis for breast tomosynthesis.
Zhao B; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5219-32. PubMed ID: 19175081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems.
Marshall NW; Monnin P; Bosmans H; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(14):4201-20. PubMed ID: 21701051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computational models of direct and indirect X-ray breast imaging detectors for in silico trials.
Sengupta A; Badal A; Makeev A; Badano A
Med Phys; 2022 Nov; 49(11):6856-6870. PubMed ID: 35997076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Back-irradiated and dual-screen sandwich detector configurations for radiography.
Lubinsky AR; Howansky A; Zheng H; Zhao W
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2019 Jul; 6(3):033501. PubMed ID: 31312672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
