These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22047461)

  • 1. Numerical sensitivity modeling for the detection of skin tumors by using tetrapolar probe.
    Ramos A; Bertemes-Filho P
    Electromagn Biol Med; 2011 Dec; 30(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 22047461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of human uterine cervical electrical impedance measurements derived using two tetrapolar probes of different sizes.
    Gandhi SV; Walker DC; Brown BH; Anumba DO
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Nov; 5():62. PubMed ID: 17125510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differentiation among basal cell carcinoma, benign lesions, and normal skin using electric impedance.
    Beetner DG; Kapoor S; Manjunath S; Zhou X; Stoecker WV
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Aug; 50(8):1020-5. PubMed ID: 12892329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finite element modeling of electrode-skin contact impedance in electrical impedance tomography.
    Hua P; Woo EJ; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Apr; 40(4):335-43. PubMed ID: 8375870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of electrode geometry and cell location on single-cell impedance measurement.
    Wang JW; Wang MH; Jang LS
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2010 Feb; 25(6):1271-6. PubMed ID: 19926465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A probe for organ impedance measurement.
    Paulson KS; Pidcock MK; McLeod CN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Oct; 51(10):1838-44. PubMed ID: 15490831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrical impedance endo-tomography: imaging tissue from inside.
    Jossinet J; Marry E; Montalibet A
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):560-5. PubMed ID: 12166851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Numerical computation of impedances of a human tooth for estimation of the root canal length.
    Krizaj D; Jan J; Valencic V
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Jul; 49(7):746-8. PubMed ID: 12083312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrode contact impedance sensitivity to variations in geometry.
    Cardu R; Leong PH; Jin CT; McEwan A
    Physiol Meas; 2012 May; 33(5):817-30. PubMed ID: 22531168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Induced-current electrical impedance tomography: a 2-D theoretical simulation.
    Zlochiver S; Rosenfeld M; Abboud S
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Dec; 22(12):1550-60. PubMed ID: 14649745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vivo skin measurements with a novel probe head for simultaneous skin impedance and near-infrared spectroscopy.
    Bodén I; Larsson W; Nilsson D; Forssell E; Naredi P; Lindholm-Sethson B
    Skin Res Technol; 2011 Nov; 17(4):494-504. PubMed ID: 21492242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cell for measurements of biological tissue complex conductivity.
    Wtorek J; Poliñski A; Stelter J; Nowakowski A
    Technol Health Care; 1998 Sep; 6(2-3):177-93. PubMed ID: 9839863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The sensitivity of focused electrical impedance measurements.
    Islam N; Siddique-e Rabbani K; Wilson A
    Physiol Meas; 2010 Aug; 31(8):S97-109. PubMed ID: 20647612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-invasive and microinvasive electrical impedance spectra of skin cancer - a comparison between two techniques.
    Aberg P; Geladi P; Nicander I; Hansson J; Holmgren U; Ollmar S
    Skin Res Technol; 2005 Nov; 11(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 16221145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A nonlinear finite element model of the electrode-electrolyte-skin system.
    Panescu D; Webster JG; Stratbucker RA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1994 Jul; 41(7):681-7. PubMed ID: 7927389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Non-invasive assessment of corneal endothelial permeability by means of electrical impedance measurements.
    Guimera A; Ivorra A; Gabriel G; Villa R
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Dec; 32(10):1107-15. PubMed ID: 20832346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement and modelling the sensitivity of tetrapolar transfer impedance measurements.
    Naydenova E; Cavendish S; Wilson AJ
    Med Eng Phys; 2016 Oct; 38(10):1090-9. PubMed ID: 27475783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of 1-lead and 2-lead electrode patterns in electrical impedance endotomography.
    Fournier-Desseux A; Jossinet J
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Aug; 26(4):337-49. PubMed ID: 15886430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using compound electrodes in electrical impedance tomography.
    Hua P; Woo EJ; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Jan; 40(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 8468073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electromagnetic impedance tomography (EMIT): a new method for impedance imaging.
    Levy S; Adam D; Bresler Y
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):676-87. PubMed ID: 12166865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.