These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22047931)

  • 1. Good experiences with an audience response system used in medical education.
    Jensen JV; Ostergaard D; Faxholt AK
    Dan Med Bull; 2011 Nov; 58(11):A4333. PubMed ID: 22047931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Audience response-systems enhance the learning environment].
    Jensen JV; Østergaard D
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2011 Nov; 173(46):2948-51. PubMed ID: 22094214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the effect of interactive audience response systems on the perceived learning experience of nursing students.
    Porter AG; Tousman S
    J Nurs Educ; 2010 Sep; 49(9):523-7. PubMed ID: 20509583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Audience response techniques for 21st century radiology education.
    Richardson ML
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jul; 21(7):834-41. PubMed ID: 24833568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of differing Audience Response System question types on student attention in the veterinary medical classroom.
    Rush BR; Hafen M; Biller DS; Davis EG; Klimek JA; Kukanich B; Larson RL; Roush JK; Schermerhorn T; Wilkerson MJ; White BJ
    J Vet Med Educ; 2010; 37(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 20576903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Audience response systems: technology to engage learners.
    Collins J
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Sep; 5(9):993-1000. PubMed ID: 18755440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do questions help? The impact of audience response systems on medical student learning: a randomised controlled trial.
    Mains TE; Cofrancesco J; Milner SM; Shah NG; Goldberg H
    Postgrad Med J; 2015 Jul; 91(1077):361-7. PubMed ID: 26045510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An audience response system may influence student performance on anatomy examination questions.
    Hoyt A; McNulty JA; Gruener G; Chandrasekhar A; Espiritu B; Ensminger D; Price R; Naheedy R
    Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(6):295-9. PubMed ID: 20890951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A controlled study of improvements in student exam performance with the use of an audience response system during medical school lectures.
    Stoddard HA; Piquette CA
    Acad Med; 2010 Oct; 85(10 Suppl):S37-40. PubMed ID: 20881700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Promoting active learning using audience response system in large bioscience classes.
    Efstathiou N; Bailey C
    Nurse Educ Today; 2012 Jan; 32(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 21349612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Audience response systems in medical student education benefit learners and presenters.
    Nayak L; Erinjeri JP
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 18348839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using audience response technology in hospital education programs.
    McRae ME; Elgie-Watson J
    J Contin Educ Nurs; 2010 Jul; 41(7):323-8. PubMed ID: 20411876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of training of teachers in medical education in four medical schools of Nepal.
    Baral N; Paudel BH; Das BK; Aryal M; Das BP; Jha N; Lamsal M
    Nepal Med Coll J; 2007 Sep; 9(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 18092430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of using an audience response system on learning, motivation and information retention in the orthodontic teaching of undergraduate dental students: a cross-over trial.
    Dhaliwal HK; Allen M; Kang J; Bates C; Hodge T
    J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 42(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 25849094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of audience response systems in nursing education: best practice guidelines.
    Mareno N; Bremner M; Emerson C
    Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh; 2010; 7():Article32. PubMed ID: 21044032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-aided vs. tutor-delivered teaching of exposure therapy for phobia/panic: randomized controlled trial with pre-registration nursing students.
    Gega L; Norman IJ; Marks IM
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2007 Mar; 44(3):397-405. PubMed ID: 16631177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Livening up the classroom: using audience response systems to promote active learning.
    Collins LJ
    Med Ref Serv Q; 2007; 26(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 17210552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using an audience response system (ARS) in a face-to-face and distance education CPT/HCPCS coding course.
    Harris ST; Zeng X
    Perspect Health Inf Manag; 2010 Jan; 7(Winter):1f. PubMed ID: 20697463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using audience response technology for pretest reviews in an undergraduate nursing course.
    Stein PS; Challman SD; Brueckner JK
    J Nurs Educ; 2006 Nov; 45(11):469-73. PubMed ID: 17120866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiologist/Educator knowledge of the audience response system and limitations to its use.
    Nicholson BT; Bassignani MJ
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Dec; 16(12):1555-60. PubMed ID: 19836271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.