160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22048526)
1. Calculation and experimental verification of the RBE-weighted dose for scanned ion beams in the presence of target motion.
Gemmel A; Rietzel E; Kraft G; Durante M; Bert C
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Dec; 56(23):7337-51. PubMed ID: 22048526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The FLUKA Monte Carlo code coupled with the local effect model for biological calculations in carbon ion therapy.
Mairani A; Brons S; Cerutti F; Fassò A; Ferrari A; Krämer M; Parodi K; Scholz M; Sommerer F
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(15):4273-89. PubMed ID: 20647603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 4D treatment planning for scanned ion beams.
Bert C; Rietzel E
Radiat Oncol; 2007 Jul; 2():24. PubMed ID: 17608919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and performance evaluation of a dynamic phantom for biological dosimetry of moving targets.
Gemmel A; Bert C; Saito N; von Neubeck C; Iancu G; K-Weyrather W; Durante M; Rietzel E
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 55(11):2997-3009. PubMed ID: 20442464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fast Biological Modeling for Voxel-based Heavy Ion Treatment Planning Using the Mechanistic Repair-Misrepair-Fixation Model and Nuclear Fragment Spectra.
Kamp F; Cabal G; Mairani A; Parodi K; Wilkens JJ; Carlson DJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Nov; 93(3):557-68. PubMed ID: 26460998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modeling RBE-weighted dose variations in irregularly moving abdominal targets treated with carbon ion beams.
Meschini G; Kamp F; Hofmaier J; Reiner M; Sharp G; Paganetti H; Belka C; Wilkens JJ; Carlson DJ; Parodi K; Baroni G; Riboldi M
Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 47(7):2768-2778. PubMed ID: 32162332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantification of interplay effects of scanned particle beams and moving targets.
Bert C; Grözinger SO; Rietzel E
Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(9):2253-65. PubMed ID: 18401063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dose prescription in carbon ion radiotherapy: a planning study to compare NIRS and LEM approaches with a clinically-oriented strategy.
Fossati P; Molinelli S; Matsufuji N; Ciocca M; Mirandola A; Mairani A; Mizoe J; Hasegawa A; Imai R; Kamada T; Orecchia R; Tsujii H
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(22):7543-54. PubMed ID: 23104051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulations to design an online motion compensation system for scanned particle beams.
Grözinger SO; Rietzel E; Li Q; Bert C; Haberer T; Kraft G
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jul; 51(14):3517-31. PubMed ID: 16825746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Commissioning of Helium Ion Therapy and the First Patient Treatment With Active Beam Delivery.
Tessonnier T; Ecker S; Besuglow J; Naumann J; Mein S; Longarino FK; Ellerbrock M; Ackermann B; Winter M; Brons S; Qubala A; Haberer T; Debus J; Jäkel O; Mairani A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2023 Jul; 116(4):935-948. PubMed ID: 36681200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of respiratory motion on variable relative biological effectiveness in 4D-dose distributions of proton therapy.
Ulrich S; Wieser HP; Cao W; Mohan R; Bangert M
Acta Oncol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):1420-1427. PubMed ID: 28828913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tumour tracking with scanned proton beams: assessing the accuracy and practicalities.
van de Water S; Kreuger R; Zenklusen S; Hug E; Lomax AJ
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 54(21):6549-63. PubMed ID: 19826204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Upgrade and benchmarking of a 4D treatment planning system for scanned ion beam therapy.
Richter D; Schwarzkopf A; Trautmann J; Krämer M; Durante M; Jäkel O; Bert C
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051722. PubMed ID: 23635270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. SBRT of lung tumours: Monte Carlo simulation with PENELOPE of dose distributions including respiratory motion and comparison with different treatment planning systems.
Panettieri V; Wennberg B; Gagliardi G; Duch MA; Ginjaume M; Lax I
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4265-81. PubMed ID: 17664607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Significance and implementation of RBE variations in proton beam therapy.
Paganetti H
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2003 Oct; 2(5):413-26. PubMed ID: 14529306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric verification and clinical evaluation of a new commercially available Monte Carlo-based dose algorithm for application in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment planning.
Fragoso M; Wen N; Kumar S; Liu D; Ryu S; Movsas B; Munther A; Chetty IJ
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4445-64. PubMed ID: 20668343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient-specific IMRT verification using independent fluence-based dose calculation software: experimental benchmarking and initial clinical experience.
Georg D; Stock M; Kroupa B; Olofsson J; Nyholm T; Ahnesjö A; Karlsson M
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4981-92. PubMed ID: 17671348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
