These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22048582)

  • 1. Role of ultrasound in detection of metastatic neck nodes in patients with oral cancer.
    Sureshkannan P; ; John R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(3):419-23. PubMed ID: 22048582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Which is important in the evaluation of metastatic lymph nodes in head and neck cancer: palpation, ultrasonography, or computed tomography?
    Haberal I; Celik H; Göçmen H; Akmansu H; Yörük M; Ozeri C
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Feb; 130(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 14990916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can 3'-Deoxy-3'-((18)F) Fluorothymidine Out Perform 2-Deoxy-2-((18)F) Fluoro-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Cervical Lymphadenopathy in Patients With Oral/Head and Neck Cancer?
    Schaefferkoetter JD; Carlson ER; Heidel RE
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 73(7):1420-8. PubMed ID: 25869746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Ultrasound surveillance of cervical lymph node metastasis in thoracic esophageal carcinoma].
    Fang WT; Zhang ZH; Chen WH; Jiang Y; Tao JW; Zhou YZ
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Jul; 41(7):523-5. PubMed ID: 12921660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 18F-FLT PET does not discriminate between reactive and metastatic lymph nodes in primary head and neck cancer patients.
    Troost EG; Vogel WV; Merkx MA; Slootweg PJ; Marres HA; Peeters WJ; Bussink J; van der Kogel AJ; Oyen WJ; Kaanders JH
    J Nucl Med; 2007 May; 48(5):726-35. PubMed ID: 17475960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Results of pretherapeutic lymph node diagnosis in head and neck tumors. Clinical value of 18-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)].
    Di Martino E; Nowak B; Krombach GA; Sellhaus B; Hausmann R; Cremerius U; Büll U; Westhofen M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2000 Apr; 79(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 10838683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic Accuracy of Multislice CT Scan in the Detection of Occult Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis in Head and Neck Cancers.
    Salman R; Hussain M; Adil SO
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2017 May; 27(5):275-278. PubMed ID: 28599687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PET and PET/CT of the neck lymph nodes improves risk prediction in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.
    Liao CT; Wang HM; Huang SF; Chen IH; Kang CJ; Lin CY; Fan KH; Ng SH; Hsueh C; Lee LY; Lin CH; Yen TC
    J Nucl Med; 2011 Feb; 52(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 21270454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A histologically controlled study of the value of sonography and palpation for the detection and exclusion of neck lymph node enlargements and metastases].
    Steinkamp HJ; Mathe F; Treisch J; Hosten N; Neumann K; Felix R
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Nov; 1(6):312-8. PubMed ID: 1821636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Ultrasonographic evaluation of metastatic cervical lymph nodes in head and neck cancers].
    Mikami Y; Kamata S; Kawabata K; Nigauri T; Hoki K; Mitani H; Beppu T
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2000 Jul; 103(7):812-20. PubMed ID: 10946554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Positron emission tomography in the evaluation of the negative neck in patients with oral cavity cancer.
    Myers LL; Wax MK
    J Otolaryngol; 1998 Dec; 27(6):342-7. PubMed ID: 9857320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [CT scanning of the cervical lymph node metastases: compared with histologic sections].
    Xu W; Liu D; Lu Z
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1998 Mar; 12(3):99-102. PubMed ID: 11189141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new method for the prediction of cervical node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: a combination of Martínez-Gimeno Scoring System and clinical palpation.
    Martínez-Gimeno C; Rodríguez-Delgado LE; Perera-Molinero A; Trujillo Mdel C; Chivite A; Maeso MC; Aguirre-Jaime A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Oct; 39(7):534-7. PubMed ID: 21112791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for the assessment of cervical metastases.
    Knappe M; Louw M; Gregor RT
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2000 Sep; 126(9):1091-6. PubMed ID: 10979122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Cervical lymph node metastases: a histologically controlled comparison of palpation, sonography and computed tomography].
    Leicher-Düber A; Bleier R; Düber C; Thelen M
    Rofo; 1990 Nov; 153(5):575-9. PubMed ID: 2173066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of computed tomography in the prediction of extracapsular spread of lymph node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
    Chai RL; Rath TJ; Johnson JT; Ferris RL; Kubicek GJ; Duvvuri U; Branstetter BF
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Nov; 139(11):1187-94. PubMed ID: 24076619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relative value of ultrasound, computed tomography and positron emission tomography imaging in the clinically node-negative neck in oral cancer.
    Chaukar D; Dandekar M; Kane S; Arya S; Purandare N; Rangarajan V; Deshmukh A; Pai P; Chaturvedi P; D'Cruz A
    Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jun; 12(2):e332-8. PubMed ID: 25131685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Ultrasound evaluation of characteristics of cervical lymph nodes with special reference to color Doppler ultrasound. A contribution to differentiating reactive from metastatic lymph node involvement in the neck].
    Issing PR; Kettling T; Kempf HG; Heermann R; Lenarz T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Oct; 78(10):566-72. PubMed ID: 10595342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of multiple time point dynamic positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with oral/head and neck cancer does not predictably identify metastatic cervical lymph nodes.
    Carlson ER; Schaefferkoetter J; Townsend D; McCoy JM; Campbell PD; Long M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 71(1):162-77. PubMed ID: 22742956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can contrast-enhanced ultrasound distinguish malignant from reactive lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancers?
    Dudau C; Hameed S; Gibson D; Muthu S; Sandison A; Eckersley RJ; Clarke P; Cosgrove DO; Lim AK
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Apr; 40(4):747-54. PubMed ID: 24462154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.