These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22048732)

  • 1. The growth of clinical trials and systematic reviews in informing dermatological patient care.
    Williams HC; Dellavalle RP
    J Invest Dermatol; 2012 Mar; 132(3 Pt 2):1008-17. PubMed ID: 22048732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of systematic reviews in clinical trials and narrative reviews in dermatology: is the best evidence being used?
    Conde-Taboada A; Aranegui B; García-Doval I; Dávila-Seijo P; González-Castro U
    Actas Dermosifiliogr; 2014 Apr; 105(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 24661956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cautionary tales in the interpretation of systematic reviews of therapy trials.
    Scott I; Greenberg P; Poole P; Campbell D
    Intern Med J; 2006 Sep; 36(9):587-99. PubMed ID: 16911551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Survey of the reporting characteristics of systematic reviews in rehabilitation.
    Gianola S; Gasparini M; Agostini M; Castellini G; Corbetta D; Gozzer P; Li LC; Sirtori V; Taricco M; Tetzlaff JM; Turolla A; Moher D; Moja L
    Phys Ther; 2013 Nov; 93(11):1456-66. PubMed ID: 23744458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic reviews supporting practice guideline recommendations lack protection against bias.
    Brito JP; Tsapas A; Griebeler ML; Wang Z; Prutsky GJ; Domecq JP; Murad MH; Montori VM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jun; 66(6):633-8. PubMed ID: 23510557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Twenty years of Cochrane reviews in menstrual disorders and subfertility.
    Farquhar C; Moore V; Bhattacharya S; Blake D; Vail A; Thomas J; Cheong Y; Showell M; Nagels H; Marjoribanks J;
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Nov; 28(11):2883-92. PubMed ID: 23990642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving the completeness and transparency of reports of randomized trials in oral health: the CONSORT statement.
    Needleman I; Worthington H; Moher D; Schulz K; Altman DG
    Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 18435368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort.
    van Driel ML; De Sutter A; De Maeseneer J; Christiaens T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):838-844.e3. PubMed ID: 19128939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcome reporting bias in evaluations of public health interventions: evidence of impact and the potential role of a study register.
    Pearson M; Peters J
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2012 Apr; 66(4):286-9. PubMed ID: 21652522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Poor reporting of quality of life outcomes in dermatology randomized controlled clinical trials.
    Le Cleach L; Chassany O; Levy A; Wolkenstein P; Chosidow O
    Dermatology; 2008; 216(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 18032899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Some methodological points to consider when performing systematic reviews in comparative effectiveness research.
    Berlin JA; Cepeda MS
    Clin Trials; 2012 Feb; 9(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 22049086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mapping the Cochrane evidence for decision making in health care.
    El Dib RP; Atallah AN; Andriolo RB
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Aug; 13(4):689-92. PubMed ID: 17683315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence based evaluation of immuno-coagulatory interventions in critical care.
    Afshari A
    Dan Med Bull; 2011 Sep; 58(9):B4316. PubMed ID: 21893014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Control of bias in randomized controlled trials published in prosthodontic journals.
    Dumbrigue HB; Jones JS; Esquivel JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):592-6. PubMed ID: 11753309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Democratizing the clinical trials agenda in dermatology.
    Williams HC
    J Invest Dermatol; 2013 May; 133(5):1118-20. PubMed ID: 23594527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?".
    Rothwell PM
    Lancet; 2005 Jan 1-7; 365(9453):82-93. PubMed ID: 15639683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.