238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22049670)
21. How reason for surgery and patient weight affect verdicts and perceptions in medical malpractice trials: a comparison of students and jurors.
Reichert J; Miller MK; Bornstein BH; Shelton HD
Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):395-418. PubMed ID: 21308752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Defendant remorse, need for affect, and juror sentencing decisions.
Corwin EP; Cramer RJ; Griffin DA; Brodsky SL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 22396340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Community sentiment and the juvenile offender: should juveniles charged with felony murder be waived into the adult criminal justice system?
Garberg NM; Libkuman TM
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(4):553-75. PubMed ID: 19437541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. "But He's a Star Football Player!": How Social Status Influences Mock Jurors' Perceptions in a Sexual Assault Case.
Pica E; Sheahan C; Pozzulo J
J Interpers Violence; 2020 Oct; 35(19-20):3963-3985. PubMed ID: 29294785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The influence of accounts and remorse on mock jurors' judgments of offenders.
Jehle A; Miller MK; Kemmelmeier M
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 19082696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Law & psychiatry: punishing juveniles who kill.
Appelbaum PS
Psychiatr Serv; 2012 Oct; 63(10):956-8. PubMed ID: 23032673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The impact of juveniles' ages and levels of psychosocial maturity on judges' opinions about adjudicative competence.
Cox JM; Goldstein NE; Dolores J; Zelechoski AD; Messenheimer S
Law Hum Behav; 2012 Feb; 36(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 22471382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessing the "evolving standards of decency:" perceptions of capital punishment for juveniles.
Kalbeitzer R; Goldstein NE
Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):157-78. PubMed ID: 16557619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Fifty delinquents in juvenile and adult court.
Beyer M
Am J Orthopsychiatry; 2006 Apr; 76(2):206-14. PubMed ID: 16719640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Will jurors correct for evidence interdependence in their verdicts? It depends.
Pate M; Kienzle M; Vogler V
Behav Sci Law; 2019 Jan; 37(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 30266044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Juveniles' understanding of trial-related information: are they competent defendants?
Cooper DK
Behav Sci Law; 1997; 15(2):167-80. PubMed ID: 9309855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Attractive but guilty: deliberation and the physical attractiveness bias.
Patry MW
Psychol Rep; 2008 Jun; 102(3):727-33. PubMed ID: 18763443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of physical attractiveness on evaluations of a male employee's allegation of sexual harassment by his female employer.
Wuensch KL; Moore CH
J Soc Psychol; 2004 Apr; 144(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 15074507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. But he knew it was wrong: evaluating adolescent culpability.
Ash P
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 22396338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Transfer of Juvenile Cases to Criminal Court.
Lee SJ; Kraus LJ
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am; 2016 Jan; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 26593117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Commentary: Perception of remorse by mock jurors in a capital murder trial.
Batista LM; Myers W
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 22396342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mock jurors' evaluation of firearm examiner testimony.
Garrett BL; Scurich N; Crozier WE
Law Hum Behav; 2020 Oct; 44(5):412-423. PubMed ID: 33090867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Self-incrimination and denial in the juvenile transfer evaluation.
Barnum R
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1990; 18(4):413-27. PubMed ID: 2289031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Plea for retaining section 105--knowledge of brain development].
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother; 2008 May; 36(3):149-50. PubMed ID: 18622974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Eliminating the Competency Presumption in Juvenile Delinquency Cases.
Katner DR
Cornell J Law Public Policy; 2015; 24(3):403-50. PubMed ID: 26809160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
