These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22049670)

  • 41. Jurors' locus of control and defendants' attractiveness in death penalty sentencing.
    Beckham CM; Spray BJ; Pietz CA
    J Soc Psychol; 2007 Jun; 147(3):285-98. PubMed ID: 17703790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Saving damsels, sentencing deviants and selective chivalry decisions: juror decision-making in an ambiguous assault case.
    Meaux LT; Cox J; Kopkin MR
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(5):724-736. PubMed ID: 31984048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Application of Megan's law to juveniles.
    Trivits LC; Reppucci ND
    Am Psychol; 2002 Sep; 57(9):690-704. PubMed ID: 12237979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Juvenile crime and criminal justice: resolving border disputes.
    Fagan J
    Future Child; 2008; 18(2):81-118. PubMed ID: 21337999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Adolescent development and the regulation of youth crime.
    Scott ES; Steinberg L
    Future Child; 2008; 18(2):15-33. PubMed ID: 21337996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effect of the deliberation process and jurors' prior legal knowledge on the sentence: the role of psychological expertise and crime scene photo.
    Finkelstein R; Bastounis M
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(3):426-41. PubMed ID: 20014448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The influence of a defendant's body weight on perceptions of guilt.
    Schvey NA; Puhl RM; Levandoski KA; Brownell KD
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2013 Sep; 37(9):1275-81. PubMed ID: 23295503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Crime victims serving as jurors: is there bias present?
    Culhane SE; Hosch HM; Weaver WG
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Dec; 28(6):649-59. PubMed ID: 15732651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effects of offenders' age and health on sentencing decisions.
    Mueller-Johnson KU; Dhami MK
    J Soc Psychol; 2010; 150(1):77-97. PubMed ID: 20196530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effects of rehabilitative voir dire on juror bias and decision making.
    Crocker CB; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Jun; 34(3):212-26. PubMed ID: 19644740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The effect of acknowledging mock jurors' feelings on affective and cognitive biases: it depends on the sample.
    McCabe JG; Krauss DA
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):331-57. PubMed ID: 21766326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Differences in legal outcomes for male and female children who have been sexually abused.
    Edelson MG; Joa D
    Sex Abuse; 2010 Dec; 22(4):427-42. PubMed ID: 20935340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The influence of FMRI lie detection evidence on juror decision-making.
    McCabe DP; Castel AD; Rhodes MG
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):566-77. PubMed ID: 21751243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Sex, sexual orientation, and sexism: what influence do these factors have on verdicts in a crime-of-passion case?
    Ragatz LL; Russell B
    J Soc Psychol; 2010; 150(4):341-60. PubMed ID: 20718220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Mock jurors' perceptions and case decisions following a juvenile interrogation: Investigating the roles of interested adults and confession type.
    Mindthoff A; Malloy LC; Höhs JM
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Jun; 44(3):209-222. PubMed ID: 32496092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Determining criminal responsibility: How relevant are insight and personal attitudes to mock jurors?
    Jung S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():37-42. PubMed ID: 26294081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Delimiting the age of criminal responsibility (section 3 of the juvenile court act) from legal innocence and diminished responsibility (sections 20, 21 of the criminal code) from the adolescent psychiatry viewpoint].
    Hummel P
    Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 1995 Jan; 44(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 7892147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The relationship between verdict, defendant characteristics, and type of crime in sex-related criminal cases.
    Beck JC; Borenstein N; Dreyfus J
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1986; 14(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 3730627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Chaos in the courtroom reconsidered: emotional bias and juror nullification.
    Horowitz IA; Kerr NL; Park ES; Gockel C
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):163-81. PubMed ID: 16786405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The Impact of Gender Stereotypes on Legal Perceptions of Lesbian Intimate Partner Violence.
    Wasarhaley NE; Lynch KR; Golding JM; Renzetti CM
    J Interpers Violence; 2017 Mar; 32(5):635-658. PubMed ID: 25990382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.