These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22050262)

  • 1. Understanding standard drinks and drinking guidelines.
    Kerr WC; Stockwell T
    Drug Alcohol Rev; 2012 Mar; 31(2):200-5. PubMed ID: 22050262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictors of awareness of standard drink labelling and drinking guidelines to reduce negative health effects among Australian drinkers.
    Coomber K; Jones SC; Martino F; Miller PG
    Drug Alcohol Rev; 2017 Mar; 36(2):200-209. PubMed ID: 26841354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "My drink is larger than yours"? A literature review of self-defined drink sizes and standard drinks.
    Devos-Comby L; Lange JE
    Curr Drug Abuse Rev; 2008 Jun; 1(2):162-76. PubMed ID: 19630715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing the Efficacy of Alcohol Labels with Standard Drink Information and National Drinking Guidelines on Consumers' Ability to Estimate Alcohol Consumption.
    Hobin E; Vallance K; Zuo F; Stockwell T; Rosella L; Simniceanu A; White C; Hammond D
    Alcohol Alcohol; 2018 Jan; 53(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 29016708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do college students drink more than they think? Use of a free-pour paradigm to determine how college students define standard drinks.
    White AM; Kraus CL; McCracken LA; Swartzwelder HS
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2003 Nov; 27(11):1750-6. PubMed ID: 14634490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adjustments for drink size and ethanol content: new results from a self-report diary and transdermal sensor validation study.
    Bond JC; Greenfield TK; Patterson D; Kerr WC
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2014 Dec; 38(12):3060-7. PubMed ID: 25581661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Empirical evaluation of the presence of a label containing standard drinks on pour accuracy among US college students.
    Brunk E; Becker MW; Bix L
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0241583. PubMed ID: 33151959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. My cup runneth over: young people's lack of knowledge of low-risk drinking guidelines.
    de Visser RO; Birch JD
    Drug Alcohol Rev; 2012 Mar; 31(2):206-12. PubMed ID: 22050096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Personalized feedback based on a drink-pouring exercise may improve knowledge of, and adherence to, government guidelines for alcohol consumption.
    de Visser RO
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2015 Feb; 39(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 25684051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of alcohol label designs with different pictorial representations of alcohol content and health warnings on knowledge and understanding of low-risk drinking guidelines: a randomized controlled trial.
    Gold N; Egan M; Londakova K; Mottershaw A; Harper H; Burton R; Henn C; Smolar M; Walmsley M; Arambepola R; Watson R; Bowen S; Greaves F
    Addiction; 2021 Jun; 116(6):1443-1459. PubMed ID: 33169443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alcohol pouring practices among 65- to 74-year-olds in Western Australia.
    Wilkinson C; Allsop S; Chikritzhs T
    Drug Alcohol Rev; 2011 Mar; 30(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 21355907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of alcoholic standard drinks using the Munich composite international diagnostic interview (M-CIDI): An evaluation and subsequent revision.
    Kuitunen-Paul S; Rehm J; Lachenmeier DW; Kadrić F; Kuitunen PT; Wittchen HU; Manthey J
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2017 Sep; 26(3):. PubMed ID: 28370786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Federal Trade Commission's mandated Four Loko labeling fails to facilitate accurate estimation of alcohol content by college students.
    Rossheim ME; Yurasek AM; Greene KM; Gonzalez-Pons KM; Barry AE; Thombs DL; Trangenstein PJ; Nelson C; Cavazos T; Treffers RD; Jernigan DH
    Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse; 2020 Jul; 46(4):430-437. PubMed ID: 31592678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Not all drinks are created equal: implications for alcohol assessment in India.
    Nayak MB; Kerr W; Greenfield TK; Pillai A
    Alcohol Alcohol; 2008; 43(6):713-8. PubMed ID: 18832137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An alternative to standard drinks as a measure of alcohol consumption.
    Kaskutas LA; Graves K
    J Subst Abuse; 2000; 12(1-2):67-78. PubMed ID: 11288475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimates of the Absolute and Relative Strengths of Diverse Alcoholic Drinks by Young People.
    Walker S; Higgs S; Terry P
    Subst Use Misuse; 2016 Nov; 51(13):1781-9. PubMed ID: 27556869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Large drinks are no mistake: glass size, not shape, affects alcoholic beverage drink pours.
    Kerr WC; Patterson D; Koenen MA; Greenfield TK
    Drug Alcohol Rev; 2009 Jul; 28(4):360-5. PubMed ID: 19594789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A drink is a drink? Variation in the amount of alcohol contained in beer, wine and spirits drinks in a US methodological sample.
    Kerr WC; Greenfield TK; Tujague J; Brown SE
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2005 Nov; 29(11):2015-21. PubMed ID: 16340459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The distribution of alcohol consumption and the prevention paradox in Brazil.
    Caetano R; Mills B; Pinsky I; Zaleski M; Laranjeira R
    Addiction; 2012 Jan; 107(1):60-8. PubMed ID: 21752142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of 'standard drink' labelling on the ability of drinkers to pour a 'standard drink'.
    Stockwell T; Blaze-Temple D; Walker C
    Aust J Public Health; 1991 Mar; 15(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 2025677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.