BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22051198)

  • 21. Cementing the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: which technique is the best?
    Vanlommel J; Luyckx JP; Labey L; Innocenti B; De Corte R; Bellemans J
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Apr; 26(3):492-6. PubMed ID: 20381290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Surface pretreatment for prolonged survival of cemented tibial prosthesis components: full- vs. surface-cementation technique].
    Mumme T; Marx R; Qunaibi M; Niethard FU; Wirtz DC
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2006 Jul; 51(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 16915772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Femoral fixation pattern in cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty--an experimental cadaver study.
    Clarius M; Mohr G; Jaeger S; Seeger JB; Bitsch RG
    Knee; 2010 Dec; 17(6):398-402. PubMed ID: 20006930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pulsatile Lavage During Cementation of Total Knee Arthroplasty - Is Fixation Impaired? A Cadaver Study.
    Glowalla C; Ertl M; Lenze U; Lazic I; Burgkart R; Lang JJ; VON Eisenhart-Rothe R; Pohlig F
    In Vivo; 2022; 36(2):672-677. PubMed ID: 35241521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cement penetration with pulsed lavage versus syringe irrigation in total knee arthroplasty.
    Maistrelli GL; Antonelli L; Fornasier V; Mahomed N
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Mar; (312):261-5. PubMed ID: 7634612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Surface cementation of stemmed tibial components in primary total knee arthroplasty: minimum 5-year follow-up.
    Hofmann AA; Goldberg TD; Tanner AM; Cook TM
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Apr; 21(3):353-7. PubMed ID: 16627142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of bone cement viscosity and set time on mantle area in total knee arthroplasty.
    Kopec M; Milbrandt JC; Kohut N; Kern B; Allan DG
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2009 Oct; 38(10):519-22. PubMed ID: 20011741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of different cement application techniques for tibial component fixation in TKA.
    Schlegel UJ; Bishop NE; Püschel K; Morlock MM; Nagel K
    Int Orthop; 2015 Jan; 39(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 25082179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Tibial component fixation with cement: full- versus surface-cementation techniques.
    Peters CL; Craig MA; Mohr RA; Bachus KN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Apr; (409):158-68. PubMed ID: 12671498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of bone density and cement morphology on biomechanical stability of tibial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Scheele CB; Pietschmann MF; Schröder C; Lenze F; Grupp TM; Müller PE
    Knee; 2020 Mar; 27(2):587-597. PubMed ID: 32024609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of a non-invasive CT-based measuring technique for cement penetration depth in human tibial UKA.
    Scheele CB; Müller PE; Schröder C; Grupp T; Jansson V; Pietschmann MF
    BMC Med Imaging; 2019 Jan; 19(1):9. PubMed ID: 30665370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Significance of bone mineral density and modern cementing technique for in vitro cement penetration in total shoulder arthroplasty].
    Pape G; Raiss P; Kleinschmidt K; Schuld C; Mohr G; Loew M; Rickert M
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Dec; 148(6):680-4. PubMed ID: 20563970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of bone density on morphologic cement penetration in minimally invasive tibial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an in vitro cadaver study.
    Scheele CB; Pietschmann MF; Schröder C; Lazic I; Grupp TM; Müller PE
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Oct; 14(1):331. PubMed ID: 31640733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Effects of the cementing technique on cementing results concerning the coxal end of the femur].
    Breusch SJ; Schneider U; Kreutzer J; Ewerbeck V; Lukoschek M
    Orthopade; 2000 Mar; 29(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 10798235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An experimental comparison of different devices for pulsatile high-pressure lavage and their relevance to cement intrusion into cancellous bone.
    Kalteis T; Pförringer D; Herold T; Handel M; Renkawitz T; Plitz W
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2007 Dec; 127(10):873-7. PubMed ID: 17763858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mixed-mode failure strength of implant-cement interface specimens with varying surface roughness.
    Zelle J; Janssen D; Peeters S; Brouwer C; Verdonschot N
    J Biomech; 2011 Feb; 44(4):780-3. PubMed ID: 21074772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Effect of Tourniquet Use and Sterile Carbon Dioxide Gas Bone Preparation on Cement Penetration in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Gapinski ZA; Yee EJ; Kraus KR; Deckard ER; Meneghini RM
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1634-1639. PubMed ID: 31010776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of preparation techniques to the strength of the bone-cement interface behind the flange in total knee arthroplasty.
    van de Groes SA; de Waal Malefijt MC; Verdonschot N
    Knee; 2013 Jun; 20(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 22999642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reduction of the potential for thermal damage during hip resurfacing.
    Gill HS; Campbell PA; Murray DW; De Smet KA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Jan; 89(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 17259409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Measurement of transient and residual stresses during polymerization of bone cement for cemented hip implants.
    Nuño N; Madrala A; Plamondon D
    J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2605-11. PubMed ID: 18692188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.