629 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22051490)
1. Evaluation of enamel surfaces after bracket debonding: an in-vivo study with scanning electron microscopy.
Alessandri Bonetti G; Zanarini M; Incerti Parenti S; Lattuca M; Marchionni S; Gatto MR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 22051490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of self-etchant pH on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
Ostby AW; Bishara SE; Denehy GE; Laffoon JF; Warren JJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 18675201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different self-etching adhesives.
Scougall Vilchis RJ; Yamamoto S; Kitai N; Yamamoto K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 19732677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bracket bonding with 15- or 60-second etching and adhesive remaining on enamel after debonding.
Osorio R; Toledano M; Garcia-Godoy F
Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 10022184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bond strength of 4 orthodontic adhesives used with a caries-protective resin sealant.
Lowder PD; Foley T; Banting DW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 18675212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of the bonding mechanism of a self-etching primer on enamel.
Cal-Neto JP; Miguel JA
Angle Orthod; 2006 Jan; 76(1):132-6. PubMed ID: 16448283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods.
Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Ozkalayci N; Turk T
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 19164413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enamel loss and adhesive remnants following bracket removal and various clean-up procedures in vitro.
Ryf S; Flury S; Palaniappan S; Lussi A; van Meerbeek B; Zimmerli B
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 21228118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bond strengths and adhesive remnant index of self-etching adhesives used to bond brackets to instrumented and uninstrumented enamel.
Ritter DE; Ritter AV; Bruggeman G; Locks A; Tulloch JF
Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 16555658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Depth of resin penetration into enamel with 3 types of enamel conditioning methods: a confocal microscopic study.
Ramesh Kumar KR; Shanta Sundari KK; Venkatesan A; Chandrasekar S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):479-85. PubMed ID: 21967934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of air abrasion on the retention of metallic brackets bonded to fluorosed enamel surface.
Suma S; Anita G; Chandra Shekar BR; Kallury A
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 22945715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to enamel with amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic composite.
Uysal T; Ustdal A; Nur M; Catalbas B
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 20080960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Physical and adhesive properties of dental enamel after radiotherapy and bonding of metal and ceramic brackets.
Santin GC; Palma-Dibb RG; Romano FL; de Oliveira HF; Nelson Filho P; de Queiroz AM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):283-92. PubMed ID: 26232837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to amalgam with different intermediate resins and adhesives.
Germec D; Cakan U; Ozdemir FI; Arun T; Cakan M
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 19073953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fluoride release from an orthodontic glass ionomer adhesive in vitro and enamel fluoride uptake in vivo.
Chatzistavrou E; Eliades T; Zinelis S; Athanasiou AE; Eliades G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):458.e1-8; discussion 458-9. PubMed ID: 20362902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of loading mode on bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with 2 systems.
Katona TR; Long RW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jan; 129(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 16443480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new generation of self-etching adhesives: comparison with traditional acid etch technique.
Holzmeier M; Schaubmayr M; Dasch W; Hirschfelder U
J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Mar; 69(2):78-93. PubMed ID: 18385954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shear strength of ceramic brackets bonded to etched or unetched enamel.
Garcia-Godoy F; Martin S
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(3):181-3. PubMed ID: 8611486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
