353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22052156)
1. Independent predictors of breast malignancy in screen-detected microcalcifications: biopsy results in 2545 cases.
Farshid G; Sullivan T; Downey P; Gill PG; Pieterse S
Br J Cancer; 2011 Nov; 105(11):1669-75. PubMed ID: 22052156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 268 nonpalpable lesions.
Tonegutti M; Girardi V
Radiol Med; 2008 Feb; 113(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 18338128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications.
Soo MS; Baker JA; Rosen EL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):941-8. PubMed ID: 12646433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Stereotactic vacuum core biopsy of clustered microcalcifications classified as B1-RADS 3].
Obenauer S; Fischer U; Baum F; Dammert S; Füzesi L; Grabbe E
Rofo; 2001 Aug; 173(8):696-701. PubMed ID: 11570238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mucocele-like lesions of the breast: a benign cause for indeterminate or suspicious mammographic microcalcifications.
Farshid G; Pieterse S; King JM; Robinson J
Breast J; 2005; 11(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 15647073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The significance of atypical lobular hyperplasia at percutaneous breast biopsy.
Dmytrasz K; Tartter PI; Mizrachy H; Chinitz L; Rosenbaum Smith S; Estabrook A
Breast J; 2003; 9(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 12558664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast microcalcifications: multivariate analysis of radiologic and clinical factors for carcinoma.
Fondrinier E; Lorimier G; Guerin-Boblet V; Bertrand AF; Mayras C; Dauver N
World J Surg; 2002 Mar; 26(3):290-6. PubMed ID: 11865363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The significance of mammographic calcifications in early breast cancer detection.
Rosselli Del Turco M; Ciatto S; Bravetti P; Pacini P
Radiol Med; 1986; 72(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 3008222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A cluster of microcalcifications: women with high risk for breast cancer versus other women.
Uematsu T; Kasami M; Yuen S
Breast Cancer; 2009; 16(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 19350360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Active surveillance of women diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia on core needle biopsy may spare many women potentially unnecessary surgery, but at the risk of undertreatment for a minority: 10-year surgical outcomes of 114 consecutive cases from a single center.
Farshid G; Edwards S; Kollias J; Gill PG
Mod Pathol; 2018 Mar; 31(3):395-405. PubMed ID: 29099502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Breast calcifications with percutaneous vacuum-assisted biopsy diagnosis of malignancy or atypical hyerplasia: correlations with surgical findings].
Piubello Q; Montemezzi S; D'Atri C
Pathologica; 2002 Dec; 94(6):299-305. PubMed ID: 12540993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Our Radiological Experience on B3 Lesions: Correlation Between Mammographic and MRI Findings With Histologic Definitive Result.
Santucci D; Faiella E; Calabrese A; Favale L; Zobel BB; de Felice C
Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Oct; 19(5):e643-e653. PubMed ID: 31377083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Histopathologic correlation of residual mammographic microcalcifications after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer.
Adrada BE; Huo L; Lane DL; Arribas EM; Resetkova E; Yang W
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):1111-7. PubMed ID: 25287438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retrieval rate and accuracy of ultrasound-guided 14-G semi-automated core needle biopsy of breast microcalcifications.
Yi J; Lee EH; Kwak JJ; Cha JG; Jung SH
Korean J Radiol; 2014; 15(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 24497787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lesions of uncertain malignant potential of the breast (B3) on vacuum-assisted biopsy for microcalcifications: Predictors of malignancy.
Mariscotti G; Durando M; Ruggirello I; Belli P; Caumo F; Nori J; Zuiani C; Tagliafico A; Bicchierai G; Romanucci G; Londero V; Campanino PP; Bussone R; Castellano I; Mule' A; Caneva A; Bianchi S; Di Loreto C; Bergamasco L; Calabrese M; Fonio P; Houssami N
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Sep; 130():109194. PubMed ID: 32795765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasound demonstration of mammographically detected microcalcifications.
Gufler H; Buitrago-Téllez CH; Madjar H; Allmann KH; Uhl M; Rohr-Reyes A
Acta Radiol; 2000 May; 41(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 10866074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Flat epithelial atypia in directional vacuum-assisted biopsy of breast microcalcifications: surgical excision may not be necessary.
McCroskey Z; Sneige N; Herman CR; Miller RA; Venta LA; Ro JY; Schwartz MR; Ayala AG
Mod Pathol; 2018 Jul; 31(7):1097-1106. PubMed ID: 29467479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictors of invasive breast cancer in mammographically detected microcalcification in patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia, atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ and recommendations for a selective approach to sentinel lymph node biopsy.
Catteau X; Simon P; Noël JC
Pathol Res Pract; 2012 Apr; 208(4):217-20. PubMed ID: 22445178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microcalcification is an important factor in the management of breast intraductal papillomas diagnosed on core biopsy.
Li X; Weaver O; Desouki MM; Dabbs D; Shyum S; Carter G; Zhao C
Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Dec; 138(6):789-95. PubMed ID: 23161711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
