These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22052188)

  • 21. Conscious thought and the sustained attention to response task.
    Helton WS; Kern RP; Walker DR
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):600-7. PubMed ID: 19589699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sustained attention to response task (SART) shows impaired vigilance in a spectrum of disorders of excessive daytime sleepiness.
    Van Schie MK; Thijs RD; Fronczek R; Middelkoop HA; Lammers GJ; Van Dijk JG
    J Sleep Res; 2012 Aug; 21(4):390-5. PubMed ID: 22098127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Feature absence-presence and two theories of lapses of sustained attention.
    Helton WS; Russell PN
    Psychol Res; 2011 Sep; 75(5):384-92. PubMed ID: 21103888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Failures of sustained attention in life, lab, and brain: ecological validity of the SART.
    Smilek D; Carriere JS; Cheyne JA
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2564-70. PubMed ID: 20452366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Consistency of sustained attention across modalities: comparing visual and auditory versions of the SART.
    Seli P; Cheyne JA; Barton KR; Smilek D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Mar; 66(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 21910522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Self-Alert Training: volitional modulation of autonomic arousal improves sustained attention.
    O'Connell RG; Bellgrove MA; Dockree PM; Lau A; Fitzgerald M; Robertson IH
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Apr; 46(5):1379-90. PubMed ID: 18249419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Friendly Fire and the Sustained Attention to Response Task.
    Wilson KM; Head J; de Joux NR; Finkbeiner KM; Helton WS
    Hum Factors; 2015 Nov; 57(7):1219-34. PubMed ID: 26408648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Executive and arousal vigilance decrement in the context of the attentional networks: The ANTI-Vea task.
    Luna FG; Marino J; Roca J; Lupiáñez J
    J Neurosci Methods; 2018 Aug; 306():77-87. PubMed ID: 29791865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Is there semantic interference in delayed naming?
    Mädebach A; Oppermann F; Hantsch A; Curda C; Jescheniak JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):522-38. PubMed ID: 21299323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effects of real-time performance feedback and performance emphasis on the sustained attention to response task (SART).
    Mensen JM; Dang JS; Stets AJ; Helton WS
    Psychol Res; 2022 Sep; 86(6):1972-1979. PubMed ID: 34623490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The vigilance decrement in executive function is attenuated when individual chronotypes perform at their optimal time of day.
    Lara T; Madrid JA; Correa Á
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88820. PubMed ID: 24586404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The sustained attention to response task (SART) does not promote mindlessness during vigilance performance.
    Dillard MB; Warm JS; Funke GJ; Funke ME; Finomore VS; Matthews G; Shaw TH; Parasuraman R
    Hum Factors; 2014 Dec; 56(8):1364-79. PubMed ID: 25509819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does Net-Speak Experience Interfere With the Processing of Standard Words? Evidence From Net-Speak Word Recognition and Semantic Decisions.
    Chen J; Huang S; Luo R
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1932. PubMed ID: 32849135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Anxiety, cognitive self-evaluation and performance: ERP correlates.
    Righi S; Mecacci L; Viggiano MP
    J Anxiety Disord; 2009 Dec; 23(8):1132-8. PubMed ID: 19695828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The prosthetics of vigilant attention: random cuing cuts processing demands.
    O'Connor C; Robertson IH; Levine B
    Neuropsychology; 2011 Jul; 25(4):535-543. PubMed ID: 21463046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessing the influence of letter position in reading normal and transposed texts using a letter detection task.
    Guérard K; Saint-Aubin J; Poirier M; Demetriou C
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Dec; 66(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 22686154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Go-stimuli probability influences response bias in the sustained attention to response task: a signal detection theory perspective.
    Bedi A; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Psychol Res; 2023 Mar; 87(2):509-518. PubMed ID: 35403969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stroop effects on redemption and semantic effects on confession: simultaneous automatic activation of embedded and carrier words.
    Iani C; Job R; Padovani R; Nicoletti R
    Cogn Process; 2009 Nov; 10(4):327-34. PubMed ID: 19301049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture.
    Gronau N; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1685-95. PubMed ID: 19382007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Text-speak processing impairs tactile location.
    Head J; Helton W; Russell P; Neumann E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Sep; 141(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 22858873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.