These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22052761)
1. Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a review. Klotz L Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Oct; 64(8):806-14. PubMed ID: 22052761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Should prostate-specific antigen screening be offered to asymptomatic men? van Vugt HA; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2010 Jul; 10(7):1043-53. PubMed ID: 20645694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Active surveillance: pitfalls to consider. Ercole B; Parekh DJ Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Oct; 64(8):695-702. PubMed ID: 22052752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a review. Klotz L Curr Urol Rep; 2010 May; 11(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 20425623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What percentage of patients with newly diagnosed carcinoma of the prostate are candidates for surveillance? An analysis of the CaPSURE database. Barocas DA; Cowan JE; Smith JA; Carroll PR; J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1330-4; discussion 1334-5. PubMed ID: 18707731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Pros and cons of active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer]. Chiba K; Akakura K Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2011 Dec; 38(13):2538-41. PubMed ID: 22189217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate cancer: measuring PSA. Pezaro C; Woo HH; Davis ID Intern Med J; 2014 May; 44(5):433-40. PubMed ID: 24816306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is additional testing necessary in men with prostate-specific antigen levels of 1.0 ng/mL or less in a population-based screening setting? (ERSPC, section Rotterdam). Roobol MJ; Roobol DW; Schröder FH Urology; 2005 Feb; 65(2):343-6. PubMed ID: 15708050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate cancer death of men treated with initial active surveillance: clinical and biochemical characteristics. Krakowsky Y; Loblaw A; Klotz L J Urol; 2010 Jul; 184(1):131-5. PubMed ID: 20478589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cancer overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Klotz L Curr Opin Urol; 2012 May; 22(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 22472510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Diagnosis based on prostate needle biopsy: inadequate correlation between pathologic results and clinical course for individual prognosis]. van der Kwast TH; Hoedemaeker RF; Schröder FH Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Apr; 149(18):972-6. PubMed ID: 15903037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prostate-specific antigen velocity at low prostate-specific antigen levels as screening tool for prostate cancer: results of second screening round of ERSPC (ROTTERDAM). Roobol MJ; Kranse R; de Koning HJ; Schröder FH Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):309-13; discussion 313-5. PubMed ID: 14972478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate-specific antigen change in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, section Rotterdam. Raaijmakers R; Wildhagen MF; Ito K; Pàez A; de Vries SH; Roobol MJ; Schröder FH Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):316-20. PubMed ID: 14972481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Uncertainty and quality of life among men undergoing active surveillance for prostate cancer in the United States and Ireland. Hegarty JM; Wallace M; Comber H Am J Mens Health; 2008 Jun; 2(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 19477777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Early detection of cancer of the prostate. Pros and cons]. Hoesl CE; Altwein JE MMW Fortschr Med; 2005 Apr; 147(14):32, 34-6. PubMed ID: 15887681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of prostate cancer: the impact of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). Schröder FH Can J Urol; 2005 Feb; 12 Suppl 1():2-6; discussion 92-3. PubMed ID: 15780157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Active surveillance with selective delayed intervention: walking the line between overtreatment for indolent disease and undertreatment for aggressive disease. Klotz LH Can J Urol; 2005 Feb; 12 Suppl 1():53-7; discussion 101-2. PubMed ID: 15780167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Active surveillance for favorable risk prostate cancer: rationale, risks, and results. Klotz L Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(6):505-9. PubMed ID: 18047961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Management and survival of screen-detected prostate cancer patients who might have been suitable for active surveillance. Roemeling S; Roobol MJ; Postma R; Gosselaar C; van der Kwast TH; Bangma CH; Schröder FH Eur Urol; 2006 Sep; 50(3):475-82. PubMed ID: 16713065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does initial surveillance in early prostate cancer reduce the chance of cure by radical prostatectomy?--A case control study. Khatami A; Damber JE; Lodding P; Pihl CG; Hugosson J Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2003; 37(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 12775279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]