These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22052883)

  • 1. Effect of rating scales on scores given to junior doctors in multi-source feedback.
    Hassell A; Bullock A; Whitehouse A; Wood L; Jones P; Wall D
    Postgrad Med J; 2012 Jan; 88(1035):10-4. PubMed ID: 22052883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors that might undermine the validity of patient and multi-source feedback.
    Archer JC; McAvoy P
    Med Educ; 2011 Sep; 45(9):886-93. PubMed ID: 21848716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. User perceptions of multi-source feedback tools for junior doctors.
    Burford B; Illing J; Kergon C; Morrow G; Livingston M
    Med Educ; 2010 Feb; 44(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 20059677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How ratings vary by staff group in multi-source feedback assessment of junior doctors.
    Bullock AD; Hassell A; Markham WA; Wall DW; Whitehouse AB
    Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):516-20. PubMed ID: 19493174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Workplace-based assessments of junior doctors: do scores predict training difficulties?
    Mitchell C; Bhat S; Herbert A; Baker P
    Med Educ; 2011 Dec; 45(12):1190-8. PubMed ID: 21995509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An investigation into the use of multi-source feedback (MSF) as a work-based assessment tool.
    Brown JM; Lowe K; Fillingham J; Murphy PN; Bamforth M; Shaw NJ
    Med Teach; 2014 Nov; 36(11):997-1004. PubMed ID: 24804910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assuring validity of multisource feedback in a national programme.
    Archer J; McGraw M; Davies H
    Arch Dis Child; 2010 May; 95(5):330-5. PubMed ID: 20457700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Republished paper: Assuring validity of multisource feedback in a national programme.
    Archer J; McGraw M; Davies H
    Postgrad Med J; 2010 Sep; 86(1019):526-31. PubMed ID: 20841329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The reliability of multisource feedback in competency-based assessment programs: the effects of multiple occasions and assessor groups.
    Moonen-van Loon JM; Overeem K; Govaerts MJ; Verhoeven BH; van der Vleuten CP; Driessen EW
    Acad Med; 2015 Aug; 90(8):1093-9. PubMed ID: 25993283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three methods of multi-source feedback compared: a plea for narrative comments and coworkers' perspectives.
    Overeem K; Lombarts MJ; Arah OA; Klazinga NS; Grol RP; Wollersheim HC
    Med Teach; 2010; 32(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 20163230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An analysis of multisource feedback within the foundation programme.
    Ellul P; Moore A; Camilleri J; Grech V
    Clin Teach; 2012 Oct; 9(5):290-4. PubMed ID: 22994465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Workplace-based assessment instruments in the health sciences.
    Magnier KM; Dale VH; Pead MJ
    J Vet Med Educ; 2012; 39(4):389-95. PubMed ID: 23187032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Specialty-specific multi-source feedback: assuring validity, informing training.
    Davies H; Archer J; Bateman A; Dewar S; Crossley J; Grant J; Southgate L
    Med Educ; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1014-20. PubMed ID: 18823521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Synchronous collection of multisource feedback evaluations does not increase inter-rater reliability.
    Garra G; Thode H
    Acad Emerg Med; 2011 Oct; 18 Suppl 2():S65-70. PubMed ID: 21999561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multisource feedback for radiation oncologists.
    Vinod SK; Lonergan DM
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2013 Jun; 57(3):384-9. PubMed ID: 23721151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Continuous, data-rich appraisal of surgical trainees' operative abilities: a novel approach for measuring performance and providing feedback.
    Roach PB; Roggin KK; Selkov G; Posner MC; Silverstein JC
    J Surg Educ; 2009; 66(5):255-63. PubMed ID: 20005497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The process of feedback in workplace-based assessment: organisation, delivery, continuity.
    Pelgrim EA; Kramer AW; Mokkink HG; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 2012 Jun; 46(6):604-12. PubMed ID: 22626052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Getting the questions right: non-compound questions are more reliable than compound questions on matched multi-source feedback instruments.
    Mackillop L; Parker-Swift J; Crossley J
    Med Educ; 2011 Aug; 45(8):843-8. PubMed ID: 21752081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Initial evaluation of the first year of the Foundation Assessment Programme.
    Davies H; Archer J; Southgate L; Norcini J
    Med Educ; 2009 Jan; 43(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 19141000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Self-assessment by trainees using self-TAB as part of the team assessment of behaviour multisource feedback tool.
    Wall D; Singh D; Whitehouse A; Hassell A; Howes J
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(2):165-7. PubMed ID: 22288997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.