These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2205300)

  • 1. Implantation of porous acrylic cement in soft tissues: an animal and human biopsy histological study.
    van Mullem PJ; Vaandrager JM; Nicolai JP; de Wijn JR
    Biomaterials; 1990 Jul; 11(5):299-304. PubMed ID: 2205300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Porous acrylic cement: evaluation of a novel implant material.
    van Mullem PJ; de Wijn JR; Vaandrager JM
    Ann Plast Surg; 1988 Dec; 21(6):576-82. PubMed ID: 3071237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bone and soft connective tissue response to porous acrylic implants. A histokinetic study.
    van Mullem PJ; de Wijn JR
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1988 Apr; 16(3):99-109. PubMed ID: 3164321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The question of the transmissibility of the results of subcutaneous tests of biomaterials from animals to humans].
    Schreiber H; Keller F; Kinzl HP; Hunger H; Knöfler W; Rübling U; Merten W
    Z Exp Chir Transplant Kunstliche Organe; 1990; 23(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 2219998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of time on human breast capsule histology: smooth and textured silicone-surfaced implants.
    Wyatt LE; Sinow JD; Wollman JS; Sami DA; Miller TA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Nov; 102(6):1922-31. PubMed ID: 9810987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Experimental study using porous, vascularizable polytetrafluoroethylene in preformed free flaps].
    Hörl HW; Klöppel M; Biemer E
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 1992 Sep; 24(5):243-9. PubMed ID: 1385280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vivo biocompatibility of collagen-poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogels.
    Jeyanthi R; Rao KP
    Biomaterials; 1990 May; 11(4):238-43. PubMed ID: 2200533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of soft-tissue substitutes.
    Ozgentaş HE; Pindur A; Spira M; Liu B; Shenaq S
    Ann Plast Surg; 1994 Aug; 33(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 7979050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Tissue reaction after implantation of ceramic biomaterials with introduced electrokinetic zeta potential on surface].
    Lewandowski R; Rutowski R; Staniszewska-Kuś J; Pielka S; Wnukiewicz B
    Polim Med; 2004; 34(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 15222224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biocompatibility comparison of novel soft tissue implants vs commonly used biomaterials in a pig model.
    Kolb CM; Pierce LM; Roofe SB
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Sep; 147(3):456-61. PubMed ID: 22687327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microtopography and soft tissue response.
    Campbell CE; von Recum AF
    J Invest Surg; 1989; 2(1):51-74. PubMed ID: 2487399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Carbon grafts produced from polyacrylonitrile for treatment of soft tissues].
    Błazewicz M
    Polim Med; 2001; 31(1-2):33-8. PubMed ID: 11712200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Histologic reactions following implantation of a "lyodura-soft" band--animal experiment studies of an abdomino-vaginal sling operation].
    Kirschbaum M; Amon H; Jennemann G
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1989; 111(15):1049-54. PubMed ID: 2683507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the toxicity of denture base polymers after subcutaneous implantation in guinea pigs.
    Kallus T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Jul; 52(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 6589396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical and histologic behavior of exposed porous high-density polyethylene implants.
    Sclafani AP; Romo T; Silver L
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Jan; 99(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 8982185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Soft tissue and cancellous bone reaction to the implantation of novel biodegradable pins and plates in rabbits.
    Panagiotopoulos E; Dauner M; Missirlis Y; Caramaro L; Plank H; Khaldi L
    Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 1997 Oct; 275():119-22. PubMed ID: 9385285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cytological evaluation of capsular tissue surrounding TCPL implant in adult rats.
    Benghuzzi H
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1996; 32():81-6. PubMed ID: 8672694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The tissue response to acrylic particles implanted in animal muscle.
    Meachim G; Brooke G; Pedley RB
    Biomaterials; 1982 Oct; 3(4):213-9. PubMed ID: 7171681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The significance of wear and material fatigue in loosening of hip prostheses].
    Willert HG; Buchhorn GH; Hess T
    Orthopade; 1989 Sep; 18(5):350-69. PubMed ID: 2682455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of bone anchoring and micro-grooves on the soft tissue reaction to implants.
    Parker JA; Walboomers XF; Von den Hoff JW; Maltha JC; Jansen JA
    Biomaterials; 2002 Sep; 23(18):3887-96. PubMed ID: 12164194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.