These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22053435)

  • 1. [What can be expected with mammography: surprising new "space occupying lesions" in the breast. Mastalgia, hyaluronic acid].
    Maurer MH; Fallenberg E
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2011 Oct; 153(42):5. PubMed ID: 22053435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The imaging features of MACROLANE™ in breast augmentation.
    Pienaar WE; McWilliams S; Wilding LJ; Perera IT
    Clin Radiol; 2011 Oct; 66(10):977-83. PubMed ID: 21546011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiological assessment of the breast following enhancement with Macrolane: Managing the challenges.
    Scaperrotta G; Satchithananda K; Tengvar M; Post K; Lim AK; Panizza P; Wesolowska E; Inglefield CJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 86():58-62. PubMed ID: 28027766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Breast imaging after augmentation with homologous adipose tissue implant].
    Unterweger M; Meuli-Simmen C; Caduff R; Kubik-Huch RA
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2000 May; 89(20):894-6. PubMed ID: 10865513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imaging of the breast.
    Birjawi G; El Zein Y
    J Med Liban; 2009; 57(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 19459577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ["Breast charter 2004". Diagnostic approach to breast pathology].
    Di Maggio C; Del Favero C; Frigerio A; Giuseppetti GM; Gozzi G; Lattanzio E; Pesce B; Rosselli Del Turco M; Simonetti G; Nosenzo MA
    Radiol Med; 2004; 108(5-6):569-87. PubMed ID: 15723003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Breast diagnosis in a patient after injection breast augmentation].
    Brehm B; Kammerer F; Schulz-Wendtland R; Wenkel E
    Rofo; 2012 Nov; 184(11):1052-4. PubMed ID: 22744326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Breast imaging: comprehensive diagnosis].
    Nakahara H
    Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():333-7. PubMed ID: 17682175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Breast cancer. Sonography and magnetic resonance mammography].
    Delorme S
    Radiologe; 2004 Jun; 44(6):621-37; quiz 638-9. PubMed ID: 15221062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lack of appropriate imaging before breast augmentation can have serious patient consequences.
    Flitcroft KL; Spillane AJ; Read RL
    Med J Aust; 2014 Mar; 200(4):198-9. PubMed ID: 24580512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Early detection of breast cancer].
    Rjosk-Dendorfer D; Friese K
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2008 Jul; 150(28-31):35-8. PubMed ID: 19006890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast.
    Given-Wilson R; Britton P
    Clin Radiol; 2004 Oct; 59(10):892-4. PubMed ID: 15451347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography.
    Hata T; Takahashi H; Watanabe K; Takahashi M; Taguchi K; Itoh T; Todo S
    J Am Coll Surg; 2004 Feb; 198(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 14759774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Value of mammography and ultrasound in diagnosis of breast carcinoma].
    Muth CP
    Zentralbl Chir; 1998; 123 Suppl 5():33-6. PubMed ID: 10063569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast cancer screening and problem solving using mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hooley RJ; Andrejeva L; Scoutt LM
    Ultrasound Q; 2011 Mar; 27(1):23-47. PubMed ID: 21343800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tailored breast cancer screening program with microdose mammography, US, and MR Imaging: short-term results of a pilot study in 40-49-year-old women.
    Venturini E; Losio C; Panizza P; Rodighiero MG; Fedele I; Tacchini S; Schiani E; Ravelli S; Cristel G; Panzeri MM; De Cobelli F; Del Maschio A
    Radiology; 2013 Aug; 268(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 23579052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
    Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast cancer screening. Benefits, risks, and current controversies.
    Barton MB
    Postgrad Med; 2005 Aug; 118(2):27-8, 33-6, 46. PubMed ID: 16164103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA enhancement: comparison with mammography and ultrasonography.
    Hachiya J; Seki T; Okada M; Nitatori T; Korenaga T; Furuya Y
    Radiat Med; 1991; 9(6):232-40. PubMed ID: 1668410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Breast cancer screening imaging: what do we do].
    Balu-Maestro C; Chapellier C; Souci J; Caramella T; Marcotte-Bloch C
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2010 Feb; 39(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 19850418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.