These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22053435)

  • 41. [Diagnostic imaging of lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic, ultrasonographic and MR findings].
    Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Puglisi F; Di Loreto C; Smania S
    Radiol Med; 2000 Dec; 100(6):436-43. PubMed ID: 11307504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of intraductal spread of breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Kubota K; Ogawa Y; Nishioka A; Kariya S; Itoh S; Murata Y; Hamada N; Maeda H; Tanaka Y
    Oncol Rep; 2007 Apr; 17(4):915-8. PubMed ID: 17342336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Breast cancer screening controversies: who, when, why, and how?
    Chetlen A; Mack J; Chan T
    Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 26093511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Diagnosis of the site and extent of breast carcinoma].
    Kessler M; Milz P; Sittek H; Schnarkowski P; Schmidt D; Bredl T; Reiser M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Jan; 5(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 7888430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The life span of silicone gel breast implants and a comparison of mammography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting implant rupture: a meta-analysis.
    Peters W; Smith D; Lugowski S
    Ann Plast Surg; 1999 Jul; 43(1):97-9. PubMed ID: 10402996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Mammographic screening in younger women at high risk.
    Hall FM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1188; author reply. PubMed ID: 19770346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Recommendations for the surveillance of young women at increased risk for breast cancer.
    Hadden WE
    Australas Radiol; 2007 Feb; 51(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 17217483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. An overview of the status of imaging screening technology for breast cancer.
    Smith JA; Andreopoulou E
    Ann Oncol; 2004; 15 Suppl 1():I18-I26. PubMed ID: 15280183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. On the frontline of screening for breast cancer.
    D'Orsi CJ; Newell MS
    Semin Oncol; 2011 Feb; 38(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 21362520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Screening, imaging, and image-guided biopsy techniques for breast cancer.
    Smetherman DH
    Surg Clin North Am; 2013 Apr; 93(2):309-27. PubMed ID: 23464688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Ultrasound and mammography for breast cancer screening.
    Houssami N; Ciatto S
    JAMA; 2008 Oct; 300(13):1514-5; author reply 1515. PubMed ID: 18827203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. How should screening breast US be audited? The BI-RADS perspective.
    Sickles EA; D'Orsi CJ
    Radiology; 2014 Aug; 272(2):316-20. PubMed ID: 25058131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Challenges in mammography: part 2, multimodality review of breast augmentation--imaging findings and complications.
    Venkataraman S; Hines N; Slanetz PJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Dec; 197(6):W1031-45. PubMed ID: 22109317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Primary oat cell carcinoma of the breast: imaging features.
    Mariscal A; Balliu E; Díaz R; Casas JD; Gallart AM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Oct; 183(4):1169-71. PubMed ID: 15385324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Clinical and radiologic features of neuroendocrine breast carcinomas.
    Jeon CH; Kim SM; Jang M; Yun BL; Ahn HS; Kim SW; Kang E; Park SY
    J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Aug; 33(8):1511-8. PubMed ID: 25063418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. BI-RADS: what do we need to know? Advantages and limitations.
    Kanso H; Hourani R; Aoun N; Ghossain M
    J Med Liban; 2009; 57(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 19623882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Breast Cancer Screening, Mammography, and Other Modalities.
    Fiorica JV
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 59(4):688-709. PubMed ID: 27741212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Re: The life span of silicone gel breast implants and a comparison of mammography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting implant rupture: a meta-analysis.
    Dowden R
    Ann Plast Surg; 1999 Jul; 43(1):99-100. PubMed ID: 10402997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Analysis of the results of 137 subclinical breast lesions excisions. Value of ultrasonography in the early diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Jacob D; Brombart JC; Muller C; Lefèbvre C; Massa F; Depoerck A
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 9091540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Papillary lesions of the breast: MRI, ultrasound, and mammographic appearances.
    Eiada R; Chong J; Kulkarni S; Goldberg F; Muradali D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Feb; 198(2):264-71. PubMed ID: 22268167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.