253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22053489)
1. The challenge of documenting water quality benefits of conservation practices: a review of USDA-ARS's conservation effects assessment project watershed studies.
Tomer MD; Locke MA
Water Sci Technol; 2011; 64(1):300-10. PubMed ID: 22053489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the relation of USDA conservation expenditures to suspended sediment reductions in an Iowa watershed.
Villarini G; Schilling KE; Jones CS
J Environ Manage; 2016 Sep; 180():375-83. PubMed ID: 27262032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A conceptual framework of agricultural land use planning with BMP for integrated watershed management.
Qi H; Altinakar MS
J Environ Manage; 2011 Jan; 92(1):149-55. PubMed ID: 20863609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the impact of field-scale management strategies on sediment transport to the watershed outlet.
Sommerlot AR; Pouyan Nejadhashemi A; Woznicki SA; Prohaska MD
J Environ Manage; 2013 Oct; 128():735-48. PubMed ID: 23851319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using the soil and water assessment tool to estimate achievable water quality targets through implementation of beneficial management practices in an agricultural watershed.
Yang Q; Benoy GA; Chow TL; Daigle JL; Bourque CP; Meng FR
J Environ Qual; 2012; 41(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 22218174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating agricultural best management practices in tile-drained subwatersheds of the Mackinaw River, Illinois.
Lemke AM; Kirkham KG; Lindenbaum TT; Herbert ME; Tear TH; Perry WL; Herkert JR
J Environ Qual; 2011; 40(4):1215-28. PubMed ID: 21712591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prioritizing watersheds for conservation actions in the southeastern coastal plain ecoregion.
Jang T; Vellidis G; Kurkalova LA; Boll J; Hyman JB
Environ Manage; 2015 Mar; 55(3):657-70. PubMed ID: 25528594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simulation of targeted pollutant-mitigation-strategies to reduce nitrate and sediment hotspots in agricultural watershed.
Teshager AD; Gassman PW; Secchi S; Schoof JT
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 607-608():1188-1200. PubMed ID: 28732398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Landscape planning for agricultural non-point source pollution reduction. II. Balancing watershed size, number of watersheds, and implementation effort.
Maxted JT; Diebel MW; Vander Zanden MJ
Environ Manage; 2009 Jan; 43(1):60-8. PubMed ID: 18594902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Riverine threat indices to assess watershed condition and identify primary management capacity of agriculture natural resource management agencies.
Fore JD; Sowa SP; Galat DL; Annis GM; Diamond DD; Rewa C
Environ Manage; 2014 Mar; 53(3):567-82. PubMed ID: 24390081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Integrated assessment modeling reveals near-channel management as cost-effective to improve water quality in agricultural watersheds.
Hansen AT; Campbell T; Cho SJ; Czuba JA; Dalzell BJ; Dolph CL; Hawthorne PL; Rabotyagov S; Lang Z; Kumarasamy K; Belmont P; Finlay JC; Foufoula-Georgiou E; Gran KB; Kling CL; Wilcock P
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jul; 118(28):. PubMed ID: 34260382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Statistical assessment of nonpoint source pollution in agricultural watersheds in the Lower Grand River watershed, MO, USA.
Jabbar FK; Grote K
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jan; 26(2):1487-1506. PubMed ID: 30430446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating nonpoint source critical source area contributions at the watershed scale.
White MJ; Storm DE; Busteed PR; Stoodley SH; Phillips SJ
J Environ Qual; 2009; 38(4):1654-63. PubMed ID: 19549942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A multicriteria evaluation approach to set forest restoration priorities based on water ecosystem services.
Valente RA; de Mello K; Metedieri JF; Américo C
J Environ Manage; 2021 May; 285():112049. PubMed ID: 33578210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework: 3. Land Use and Field Boundary Database Development and Structure.
Tomer MD; James DE; Sandoval-Green CMJ
J Environ Qual; 2017 May; 46(3):676-686. PubMed ID: 28724111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A VSA-based strategy for placing conservation buffers in agricultural watersheds.
Qiu Z
Environ Manage; 2003 Sep; 32(3):299-311. PubMed ID: 14753616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A generic approach to evaluate costs and effectiveness of agricultural Beneficial Management Practices to improve water quality management.
Zammali MK; Hassanzadeh E; Shupena-Soulodre E; Lindenschmidt KE
J Environ Manage; 2021 Jun; 287():112336. PubMed ID: 33740750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phosphorus reductions following riparian restoration in two agricultural watersheds in Vermont, USA.
Meals DW; Hopkins RB
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(9):51-60. PubMed ID: 12079124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward quantifying water pollution abatement in response to installing buffers on crop land.
Dosskey MG
Environ Manage; 2001 Nov; 28(5):577-98. PubMed ID: 11568840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of USDA-NRCS rangeland conservation programs: recommendation for an evidence-based conservation platform.
Briske DD; Bestelmeyer BT; Brown JR; Brunson MW; Thurow TL; Tanaka JA
Ecol Appl; 2017 Jan; 27(1):94-104. PubMed ID: 27870290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
