These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Standardized mammography reporting. Kopans DB Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):257-64. PubMed ID: 1732932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effect of California's Breast Density Notification Legislation on Breast Cancer Screening. Chau SL; Alabaster A; Luikart K; Brenman LM; Habel LA J Prim Care Community Health; 2017 Apr; 8(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 27799412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evolving medical-legal concepts for clinicians and imagers in evaluation of breast cancer. Brenner RJ Cancer; 1992 Apr; 69(7 Suppl):1950-3. PubMed ID: 1544098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of alternative practices on the cost and quality of mammographic screening in the United States. Burnside E; Belkora J; Esserman L Clin Breast Cancer; 2001 Jul; 2(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 11899786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast cancer screening. Interpreting new data for clinical practice. Daly L Physician Assist; 1994 Oct; 18(10):47-51, 56, 61-6. PubMed ID: 10138304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing the performance of mammography screening in the USA and the UK. Smith-Bindman R; Ballard-Barbash R; Miglioretti DL; Patnick J; Kerlikowske K J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 15814020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years. Buist DS; Porter PL; Lehman C; Taplin SH; White E J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Oct; 96(19):1432-40. PubMed ID: 15467032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammography: who, when, and why? Markle JT; Massman JE J Med Assoc Ga; 1995 Sep; 84(7):335-7. PubMed ID: 7561543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening mammography: a successful public health initiative. Feig SA Rev Panam Salud Publica; 2006; 20(2-3):125-33. PubMed ID: 17199907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women. May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A screening mammography program. Staying alive and making it work. Monsees BS; Destouet JM Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):211-9. PubMed ID: 1732928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Be careful to not willingly suspend disbelief. Kopans DB Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):645-7. PubMed ID: 15564403 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Dense breast legislation in the United States: state of the states. Dehkordy SF; Carlos RC J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Dec; 10(12):899-902. PubMed ID: 24295937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom. Smith-Bindman R; Chu PW; Miglioretti DL; Sickles EA; Blanks R; Ballard-Barbash R; Bobo JK; Lee NC; Wallis MG; Patnick J; Kerlikowske K JAMA; 2003 Oct; 290(16):2129-37. PubMed ID: 14570948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Legal evaluation of the selection decision of the public health insurance medical association--selection procedures in mammography screening]. Sczuka RA Rofo; 2007 Jul; 179(7):755-6. PubMed ID: 17592814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]