These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22053808)

  • 1. Traditional and proposed tests of slope homogeneity for non-normal and heteroscedastic data.
    Moses TP; Klockars AJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Nov; 65(3):402-26. PubMed ID: 22053808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of non-normality on test statistics for one-way independent groups designs.
    Cribbie RA; Fiksenbaum L; Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Feb; 65(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 21426313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robustness and power of analysis of covariance applied to data distorted from normality by floor effects: homogeneous regression slopes.
    Sullivan LM; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 1996 Mar; 15(5):477-96. PubMed ID: 8668873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An adaptive test of significance for a subset of regression coefficients.
    O'Gorman TW
    Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(22):3527-42. PubMed ID: 12407688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trimmed weighted Simes' test for two one-sided hypotheses with arbitrarily correlated test statistics.
    Brannath W; Bretz F; Maurer W; Sarkar S
    Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):885-98. PubMed ID: 20014203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Location tests for biomarker studies: a comparison using simulations for the two-sample case.
    Scheinhardt MO; Ziegler A
    Methods Inf Med; 2013; 52(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 23877617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the adequacy of variance function in heteroscedastic regression models.
    Wang L; Zhou XH
    Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1218-25. PubMed ID: 17484775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maximum likelihood estimation of correction for dilution bias in simple linear regression using replicates from subjects with extreme first measurements.
    Berglund L; Garmo H; Lindbäck J; Svärdsudd K; Zethelius B
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4397-407. PubMed ID: 18618419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Error analysis of robust optical flow estimation by least median of squares methods for the varying illumination model.
    Kim YH; Kak AC
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2006 Sep; 28(9):1418-35. PubMed ID: 16929729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Regression analysis with covariates that have heteroscedastic measurement error.
    Guo Y; Little RJ
    Stat Med; 2011 Aug; 30(18):2278-94. PubMed ID: 21590792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A bootstrap test for comparing two variances: simulation of size and power in small samples.
    Sun J; Chernick MR; LaBudde RA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Nov; 21(6):1079-93. PubMed ID: 22023677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Drop-outs and a random regression model.
    Overall JE
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Jul; 7(3):383-402. PubMed ID: 9252832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Semiparametric inference for surrogate endpoints with bivariate censored data.
    Ghosh D
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):149-56. PubMed ID: 17651457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Test homogeneity of risk difference across subgroups in clinical trials.
    Zhang L; Yang H; Cho I
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 19127467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of optimal fiducial target registration error in the presence of heteroscedastic noise.
    Ma B; Moghari MH; Ellis RE; Abolmaesumi P
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Mar; 29(3):708-23. PubMed ID: 20199909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stratified tests, stratified slopes, and random effects models for clinical trials with missing data.
    Dawson JD; Han SH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2000 Nov; 10(4):447-55. PubMed ID: 11104386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The profound impact of negative power law noise on statistical estimation.
    Reinhardt VS
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 Jan; 57(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 20040429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Slope estimation in structural line-segment heteroscedastic measurement error models.
    McAssey MP; Hsieh F
    Stat Med; 2010 Nov; 29(25):2631-42. PubMed ID: 20799248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Flexible Bayesian quantile regression for independent and clustered data.
    Reich BJ; Bondell HD; Wang HJ
    Biostatistics; 2010 Apr; 11(2):337-52. PubMed ID: 19948746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robust tests of equivalence for k independent groups.
    Koh A; Cribbie R
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Nov; 66(3):426-34. PubMed ID: 23043500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.