These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22054188)

  • 1. A meta-analysis of the published literature on the effectiveness of antimicrobial soaps.
    Montville R; Schaffner DW
    J Food Prot; 2011 Nov; 74(11):1875-82. PubMed ID: 22054188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alternative hand contamination technique to compare the activities of antimicrobial and nonantimicrobial soaps under different test conditions.
    Fuls JL; Rodgers ND; Fischler GE; Howard JM; Patel M; Weidner PL; Duran MH
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2008 Jun; 74(12):3739-44. PubMed ID: 18441107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Removal of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis after Hand Washing with Antimicrobial and Nonantimicrobial Soap and Persistence of These Bacteria in Rinsates.
    Pérez-Garza J; García S; Heredia N
    J Food Prot; 2017 Oct; 80(10):1670-1675. PubMed ID: 28876132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid antibacterial activity of 2 novel hand soaps: evaluation of the risk of development of bacterial resistance to the antibacterial agents.
    Geraldo IM; Gilman A; Shintre MS; Modak SM
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 29(8):736-41. PubMed ID: 18616390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantifying the Effects of Water Temperature, Soap Volume, Lather Time, and Antimicrobial Soap as Variables in the Removal of Escherichia coli ATCC 11229 from Hands.
    Jensen DA; Macinga DR; Shumaker DJ; Bellino R; Arbogast JW; Schaffner DW
    J Food Prot; 2017 Jun; 80(6):1022-1031. PubMed ID: 28504614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantifying the effect of hand wash duration, soap use, ground beef debris, and drying methods on the removal of Enterobacter aerogenes on hands.
    Jensen DA; Danyluk MD; Harris LJ; Schaffner DW
    J Food Prot; 2015 Apr; 78(4):685-90. PubMed ID: 25836392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hand hygiene with soap and water is superior to alcohol rub and antiseptic wipes for removal of Clostridium difficile.
    Oughton MT; Loo VG; Dendukuri N; Fenn S; Libman MD
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 30(10):939-44. PubMed ID: 19715426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of antibacterial effects of different antiseptics after hand washing].
    Buluş N; Kaleli I
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2004; 38(1-2):137-43. PubMed ID: 15293913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk assessment of hand washing efficacy using literature and experimental data.
    Montville R; Chen Y; Schaffner DW
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2002 Mar; 73(2-3):305-13. PubMed ID: 11934038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Removal, Kill, and Transfer of Bacteria from Hands by Antibacterial or Nonantibacterial Soaps After Handling Raw Poultry.
    Sexton JD; Picton JL; Herdt B; Black E; Reynolds KA
    J Food Prot; 2024 Jun; 87(6):100272. PubMed ID: 38579970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bacterial hand contamination and transfer after use of contaminated bulk-soap-refillable dispensers.
    Zapka CA; Campbell EJ; Maxwell SL; Gerba CP; Dolan MJ; Arbogast JW; Macinga DR
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2011 May; 77(9):2898-904. PubMed ID: 21421792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surfactant concentration and type affects the removal of Escherichia coli from pig skin during a simulated hand wash.
    Jensen DA; Rogers MA; Schaffner DW
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2017 Oct; 65(4):292-297. PubMed ID: 28727890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alcohol-impregnated wipes as an alternative in hand hygiene.
    Butz AM; Laughon BE; Gullette DL; Larson EL
    Am J Infect Control; 1990 Apr; 18(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 2337257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of liquid soap vs. chlorhexidine gluconate for the removal of Clostridium difficile from bare hands and gloved hands.
    Bettin K; Clabots C; Mathie P; Willard K; Gerding DN
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1994 Nov; 15(11):697-702. PubMed ID: 7852725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of Hand Hygiene Using 4% Chlorhexidine Gluconate or Natural Soap During Hand Rubbing Followed by Alcohol-Based 1% Chlorhexidine Gluconate Sanitizer Lotion in the Operating Room.
    Akita S; Fujioka M; Akita T; Tanaka J; Masunaga A; Kawahara T
    Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle); 2022 Jan; 11(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 33563102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short- and long-term effects of handwashing with antimicrobial or plain soap in the community.
    Larson E; Aiello A; Lee LV; Della-Latta P; Gomez-Duarte C; Lin S
    J Community Health; 2003 Apr; 28(2):139-50. PubMed ID: 12705315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantity of soap as a variable in handwashing.
    Larson EL; Eke PI; Wilder MP; Laughon BE
    Infect Control; 1987 Sep; 8(9):371-5. PubMed ID: 3654132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs.
    Kampf G; Kramer A
    Clin Microbiol Rev; 2004 Oct; 17(4):863-93, table of contents. PubMed ID: 15489352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of hand wash agents on controlling the transmission of pathogenic bacteria from hands to food.
    Fischler GE; Fuls JL; Dail EW; Duran MH; Rodgers ND; Waggoner AL
    J Food Prot; 2007 Dec; 70(12):2873-7. PubMed ID: 18095447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Foam soap is not as effective as liquid soap in eliminating hand microbial flora.
    Dixon N; Morgan M; Equils O
    Am J Infect Control; 2017 Jul; 45(7):813-814. PubMed ID: 28258814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.