These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22054637)

  • 21. Preoperative Zung Depression Scale predicts outcome after revision lumbar surgery for adjacent segment disease, recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2012 Mar; 12(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 21937282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Psychosocial factors and surgical outcomes: are elderly depressed patients less satisfied with surgery?
    Adogwa O; Carr K; Fatemi P; Verla T; Gazcon G; Gottfried O; Bagley C; Cheng J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Sep; 39(19):1614-9. PubMed ID: 24921847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Readmission rates after decompression surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis among Medicare beneficiaries.
    Modhia U; Takemoto S; Braid-Forbes MJ; Weber M; Berven SH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(7):591-6. PubMed ID: 23324923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A cost-utility analysis of Dynesys dynamic stabilization versus instrumented fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases.
    Liu K; Sun W; Lu Q; Chen J; Tang J
    J Orthop Sci; 2017 Nov; 22(6):982-987. PubMed ID: 28807742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cost-utility of lumbar decompression with or without fusion for patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Kim S; Mortaz Hedjri S; Coyte PC; Rampersaud YR
    Spine J; 2012 Jan; 12(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 22169001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Long-term outcomes after revision neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: defining the effectiveness of surgery.
    Mendenhall SK; Parker SL; Adogwa O; Shau DN; Cheng J; Aaronson O; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Oct; 27(7):353-7. PubMed ID: 25247253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A retrospective review comparing two-year patient-reported outcomes, costs, and healthcare resource utilization for TLIF vs. PLF for single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Kim E; Chotai S; Stonko D; Wick J; Sielatycki A; Devin CJ
    Eur Spine J; 2018 Mar; 27(3):661-669. PubMed ID: 28585094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Surgery for spinal stenosis: long-term reoperation rates, health care cost, and impact of instrumentation.
    Lad SP; Babu R; Ugiliweneza B; Patil CG; Boakye M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(12):978-87. PubMed ID: 24718058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Impact of cost valuation on cost-effectiveness in adult spine deformity surgery.
    Gum JL; Hostin R; Robinson C; Kelly MP; Carreon LY; Polly DW; Bess RS; Burton DC; Shaffrey CI; Smith JS; LaFage V; Schwab FJ; Ames CP; Glassman SD;
    Spine J; 2017 Jan; 17(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 27523283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Proximal junctional acute collapse cranial to multi-level lumbar fusion: a cost analysis of prophylactic vertebral augmentation.
    Hart RA; Prendergast MA; Roberts WG; Nesbit GM; Barnwell SL
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):875-81. PubMed ID: 18375188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cost-Effectiveness of Primary and Revision Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity.
    Raman T; Nayar SK; Liu S; Skolasky RL; Kebaish KM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Jun; 43(11):791-797. PubMed ID: 29099409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Cost-Effectiveness Comparison Between Open Transforaminal and Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusions Using the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio at 2-Year Follow-up.
    Gandhoke GS; Shin HM; Chang YF; Tempel Z; Gerszten PC; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS
    Neurosurgery; 2016 Apr; 78(4):585-95. PubMed ID: 26726969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Circumferential fusion is dominant over posterolateral fusion in a long-term perspective: cost-utility evaluation of a randomized controlled trial in severe, chronic low back pain.
    Soegaard R; Bünger CE; Christiansen T; Høy K; Eiskjaer SP; Christensen FB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(22):2405-14. PubMed ID: 18090078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Risk factors of adjacent segment disease requiring surgery after lumbar spinal fusion: comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterolateral fusion.
    Lee JC; Kim Y; Soh JW; Shin BJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):E339-45. PubMed ID: 24365899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Factors associated with recurrent back pain and cyst recurrence after surgical resection of one hundred ninety-five spinal synovial cysts: analysis of one hundred sixty-seven consecutive cases.
    Xu R; McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Bydon M; Olivi A; Wolinsky JP; Witham TF; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(10):1044-53. PubMed ID: 20173680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 3: assessment of economic outcome.
    Ghogawala Z; Whitmore RG; Watters WC; Sharan A; Mummaneni PV; Dailey AT; Choudhri TF; Eck JC; Groff MW; Wang JC; Resnick DK; Dhall SS; Kaiser MG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jul; 21(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 24980580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Incremental cost-effectiveness of adult spinal deformity surgery: observed quality-adjusted life years with surgery compared with predicted quality-adjusted life years without surgery.
    McCarthy I; O'Brien M; Ames C; Robinson C; Errico T; Polly DW; Hostin R;
    Neurosurg Focus; 2014 May; 36(5):E3. PubMed ID: 24785485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cost-effectiveness of conservative versus surgical treatment strategies of lumbar spinal stenosis in the Swiss setting: analysis of the prospective multicenter Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study (LSOS).
    Aichmair A; Burgstaller JM; Schwenkglenks M; Steurer J; Porchet F; Brunner F; Farshad M;
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):501-509. PubMed ID: 28040872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Adogwa O; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cost effectiveness analysis of graft options in spinal fusion surgery using a Markov model.
    Virk S; Sandhu HS; Khan SN
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Oct; 25(7):E204-10. PubMed ID: 22820278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.