These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

46 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22054857)

  • 1. Number and distribution of bacteria on some beef carcasses at selected abattoirs in some member states of the European communities.
    Roberts TA; Hudson WR; Whelehan OP; Simonsen B; Olgaard K; Labots H; Snijders JM; Van Hoof J; Debevere J; Dempster JF; Devereux J; Leistner L; Gehra H; Gledel J; Fournaud J
    Meat Sci; 1984; 11(3):191-205. PubMed ID: 22054857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microbial contamination on beef in relation to hygiene assessment based on criteria used in EU Decision 2001/471/EC.
    McEvoy JM; Sheridan JJ; Blair IS; McDowell DA
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 92(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 15109799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microbiological contamination of pig and cattle carcasses in different small-scale Swiss abattoirs.
    Zweifel C; Fischer R; Stephan R
    Meat Sci; 2008 Mar; 78(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 22062274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incidence of coagulase positive Staphylococcus on beef carcasses in three Australian abattoirs.
    Desmarchelier PM; Higgs GM; Mills L; Sullivan AM; Vanderlinde PB
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1999 Mar; 47(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 10359492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microbiological contamination of cattle and pig carcasses at five abattoirs determined by swab sampling in accordance with EU Decision 2001/471/EC.
    Zweifel C; Baltzer D; Stephan R
    Meat Sci; 2005 Mar; 69(3):559-66. PubMed ID: 22062996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between hide cleanliness and bacterial numbers on beef carcasses at a commercial abattoir.
    McEvoy JM; Doherty AM; Finnerty M; Sheridan JJ; McGuire L; Blair IS; McDowell DA; Harrington D
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2000 May; 30(5):390-5. PubMed ID: 10792669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The bacteriological quality of British beef 1. Carcasses sampled prior to chilling.
    Hinton MH; Hudson WR; Mead GC
    Meat Sci; 1998 Oct; 50(2):265-71. PubMed ID: 22060960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microbiological sampling of swine carcasses: a comparison of data obtained by swabbing with medical gauze and data collected routinely by excision at Swedish abattoirs.
    Lindblad M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 118(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 17706823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microbiological quality of chilled beef carcasses in Northern Ireland: a baseline survey.
    Murray KA; Gilmour A; Madden RH
    J Food Prot; 2001 Apr; 64(4):498-502. PubMed ID: 11307886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of incubation temperature and site of sampling on assessment of the numbers of bacteria on red meat carcasses at commercial abattoirs.
    Roberts TA; MacFie HJ; Hudson WR
    J Hyg (Lond); 1980 Dec; 85(3):371-80. PubMed ID: 7462589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bacteriological evaluation of groups of beef carcasses before the wash at six Alberta abattoirs.
    Jericho KW; Bradley JA; Kozub GC
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1994 Dec; 77(6):631-4. PubMed ID: 7822222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survival of Pseudomonas fluorescens on beef carcass surfaces in a commercial abattoir.
    Crowley KM; Prendergast DM; Sheridan JJ; McDowell DA
    Meat Sci; 2010 Jul; 85(3):550-4. PubMed ID: 20416837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relevance of abattoir hygiene assessment to microbial contamination of British beef carcases.
    Hudson WR; Mead GC; Hinton MH
    Vet Rec; 1996 Dec; 139(24):587-9. PubMed ID: 8981733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A minimal apparatus method for counting bacteria: comparison with reference method in surveying beef carcasses at three commercial abattoirs.
    Hudson WR; Roberts TA; Whelehan OP
    J Hyg (Lond); 1983 Dec; 91(3):459-66. PubMed ID: 6363526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Significance of Samples Taken for Bacterial Counts from Reduced Areas of Bovine Carcasses.
    Lasta J; Fonrouge R
    J Food Prot; 1988 Mar; 51(3):214-217. PubMed ID: 30978880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microbiological carcass sampling methods to achieve compliance with 2001/471/EC and new hygiene regulations.
    Byrne B; Dunne G; Lyng J; Bolton DJ
    Res Microbiol; 2005; 156(1):104-6. PubMed ID: 15636754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microbiologic evaluation of carcasses before and after washing in a beef slaughter plant.
    Jericho KW; Bradley JA; Kozub GC
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1995 Feb; 206(4):452-5. PubMed ID: 7632246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bacteriological status of beef carcasses at a commercial abattoir before and after slaughterline improvements.
    Hudson WR; Roberts TA; Whelehan OP
    Epidemiol Infect; 1987 Feb; 98(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 3556439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of countercurrent scalding and postscald spray on the bacteriologic profile of raw chicken carcasses.
    James WO; Prucha JC; Brewer RL; Williams WO; Christensen WA; Thaler AM; Hogue AT
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1992 Sep; 201(5):705-8. PubMed ID: 1399771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beef carcass contamination by Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains in an abattoir in Brazil: characterization and resistance to antimicrobial drugs.
    Rigobelo EC; Santo E; Marin JM
    Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2008 Dec; 5(6):811-7. PubMed ID: 18991542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.