64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22055266)
1. A comparison of the Danish MFA, Ulster and optical probes for use in pig carcass classification and grading.
Kempster AJ; Jones DW; Cuthbertson A
Meat Sci; 1979 Apr; 3(2):109-20. PubMed ID: 22055266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The estimation of sheep carcass composition from fat and muscle thickness measurements taken by probes.
Kempster AJ; Chadwick JP; Cue RI; Grantley-Smith M
Meat Sci; 1986; 16(2):113-26. PubMed ID: 22054831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the optical intrascope, the Hennessy & Chong Fat Depth Indicator and the Danish MFA probe to predict pig carcass backfat thickness.
Giles LR
Meat Sci; 1983 Jan; 8(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 22055404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of the weight of lean and fat yield in bacon weight carcasses. A comparison of predictors used in commercial pig carcass classification.
Giles LR; Ryan PJ; Watchman DK; Belinda Dettmann E
Meat Sci; 1983 Jan; 8(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 22055403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pork carcass grading: A comparison of the New Zealand Hennessy Grading Probe and the Danish Fat-O-Meater.
Fortin A; Jones SD; Haworth CR
Meat Sci; 1984; 10(2):131-44. PubMed ID: 22056064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of lean meat content in pork carcasses using the Hennessy Grading Probe and the Fat-O-Meater in Argentina.
Goenaga P; Lloveras MR; Améndola C
Meat Sci; 2008 Jul; 79(3):611-3. PubMed ID: 22062924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the prediction of alternative measures of pork carcass composition by three optical probes.
Schinckel AP; Wagner JR; Forrest JC; Einstein ME
J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):767-94. PubMed ID: 19820040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of lean and fat composition in swine carcasses from ham area measurements with image analysis.
Jia J; Schinckel AP; Forrest JC; Chen W; Wagner JR
Meat Sci; 2010 Jun; 85(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 20374892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting cutability of pork carcasses and hams using the Hennessy and Chong Fat Depth Indicator.
Kutsky JA; Savell JW; Johnson DD; Smith GC; Murphey CE; Cross HR; Weatherspoon L
Meat Sci; 1984; 11(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 22054683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationships between bacon grade schedules and carcass characteristics.
Kempster AJ; Monk AS
Meat Sci; 1986; 17(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 22055142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of alternative methods for predicting the carcass composition of crossbred lambs of different breeds and crosses.
Kempster AJ; Jones DW; Wolf BT
Meat Sci; 1986; 18(2):89-110. PubMed ID: 22055564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimation of lamb carcass composition from measurements of the speed of ultrasound in the soft tissues of live animals and carcasses.
Miles CA; Fursey GA; Fisher AV; Page SJ
Meat Sci; 1991; 30(3):245-56. PubMed ID: 22061973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of the Hennessy Grading Probe (GP) for predicting the meat, fat and bone yields of beef carcasses.
Kirton AH; Feist CL; Duganzich DM; Jordan RB; O'Donnell KP; Woods EG
Meat Sci; 1987; 20(1):51-63. PubMed ID: 22056119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vivo estimation of lamb carcass composition by real-time ultrasonography.
Teixeira A; Matos S; Rodrigues S; Delfa R; Cadavez V
Meat Sci; 2006 Oct; 74(2):289-95. PubMed ID: 22062838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationships between chemical composition and physically separated tissues of the pig carcass.
Smith WC; Pearson G
Meat Sci; 1985; 14(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 22055779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of electronic probes for classifying lamb carcasses.
Kirton AH; Mercer GJ; Duganzich DM; Uljee AE
Meat Sci; 1995; 39(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 22059823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Growth of carcass components and its relation with conformation in pigs of three types.
Fisher AV; Green DM; Whittemore CT; Wood JD; Schofield CP
Meat Sci; 2003 Sep; 65(1):639-50. PubMed ID: 22063259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Progress towards using the speed of ultrasound for beef leanness classification.
Miles CA; Fursey GA; Page SJ; Fisher AV
Meat Sci; 1990; 28(2):119-30. PubMed ID: 22055513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sheep carcass composition estimated from Longissimus thoracis et lumborum muscle volume measured by in vivo real-time ultrasonography.
Silva SR; Guedes CM; Santos VA; Lourenço AL; Azevedo JM; Dias-da-Silva A
Meat Sci; 2007 Aug; 76(4):708-14. PubMed ID: 22061248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determination of the lean meat percentage of pig carcasses using magnetic resonance imaging.
Collewet G; Bogner P; Allen P; Busk H; Dobrowolski A; Olsen E; Davenel A
Meat Sci; 2005 Aug; 70(4):563-72. PubMed ID: 22063881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
