These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22055519)

  • 1. Comparison of the quantitative performance of constant pressure versus constant flow rate gradient elution separations using concentration-sensitive detectors.
    Verstraeten M; Broeckhoven K; Lynen F; Choikhet K; Dittmann M; Witt K; Sandra P; Desmet G
    J Chromatogr A; 2012 Apr; 1232():65-76. PubMed ID: 22055519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Kinetic performance limits of constant pressure versus constant flow rate gradient elution separations. Part II: experimental.
    Verstraeten M; Broeckhoven K; Dittmann M; Choikhet K; Witt K; Desmet G
    J Chromatogr A; 2011 Feb; 1218(8):1170-84. PubMed ID: 21256497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Kinetic performance limits of constant pressure versus constant flow rate gradient elution separations. Part I: theory.
    Broeckhoven K; Verstraeten M; Choikhet K; Dittmann M; Witt K; Desmet G
    J Chromatogr A; 2011 Feb; 1218(8):1153-69. PubMed ID: 21256492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantification aspects of constant pressure (ultra) high pressure liquid chromatography using mass-sensitive detectors with a nebulizing interface.
    Verstraeten M; Broeckhoven K; Lynen F; Choikhet K; Landt K; Dittmann M; Witt K; Sandra P; Desmet G
    J Chromatogr A; 2013 Jan; 1274():118-28. PubMed ID: 23274072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Theoretical comparison of the performance of gradient elution chromatography at constant pressure and constant flow rate.
    Gritti F; Guiochon G
    J Chromatogr A; 2012 Aug; 1253():71-82. PubMed ID: 22818736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Theoretical evaluation of the advantages and limitations of constant pressure versus constant flow rate gradient elution separation in supercritical fluid chromatography.
    De Pauw R; Desmet G; Broeckhoven K
    J Chromatogr A; 2013 Oct; 1312():134-42. PubMed ID: 24041511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microfabricated refractive index gradient based detector for reversed-phase liquid chromatography with mobile phase gradient elution.
    McBrady AD; Synovec RE
    J Chromatogr A; 2006 Feb; 1105(1-2):2-10. PubMed ID: 16439249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the response of four aerosol detectors used with ultra high pressure liquid chromatography.
    Hutchinson JP; Li J; Farrell W; Groeber E; Szucs R; Dicinoski G; Haddad PR
    J Chromatogr A; 2011 Mar; 1218(12):1646-55. PubMed ID: 21315361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Numerical modeling of elution peak profiles in supercritical fluid chromatography. Part I--elution of an unretained tracer.
    Kaczmarski K; Poe DP; Guiochon G
    J Chromatogr A; 2010 Oct; 1217(42):6578-87. PubMed ID: 20813372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peak capacity in gradient reversed-phase liquid chromatography of biopolymers. Theoretical and practical implications for the separation of oligonucleotides.
    Gilar M; Neue UD
    J Chromatogr A; 2007 Oct; 1169(1-2):139-50. PubMed ID: 17897658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the gradient kinetic performance of silica monolithic capillary columns with columns packed with 3 μm porous and 2.7 μm fused-core silica particles.
    Vaast A; Broeckhoven K; Dolman S; Desmet G; Eeltink S
    J Chromatogr A; 2012 Mar; 1228():270-5. PubMed ID: 21855077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Theory of stepwise gradient elution in reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled with flow rate variations: application to retention prediction and separation optimization of a set of amino acids.
    Nikitas P; Pappa-Louisi A; Balkatzopoulou P
    Anal Chem; 2006 Aug; 78(16):5774-82. PubMed ID: 16906723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Potential advantage of constant pressure versus constant flow gradient chromatography for the analysis of small molecules.
    Gritti F; Stankovich JJ; Guiochon G
    J Chromatogr A; 2012 Nov; 1263():51-60. PubMed ID: 23040976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gradient elution separation and peak capacity of columns packed with porous shell particles.
    Marchetti N; Cavazzini A; Gritti F; Guiochon G
    J Chromatogr A; 2007 Sep; 1163(1-2):203-11. PubMed ID: 17632112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High peak capacity separations of peptides in reversed-phase gradient elution liquid chromatography on columns packed with porous shell particles.
    Marchetti N; Guiochon G
    J Chromatogr A; 2007 Dec; 1176(1-2):206-16. PubMed ID: 18036600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization of capillary-channeled polymer fiber stationary phases for high-performance liquid chromatography protein separations: Comparative analysis with a packed-bed column.
    Nelson DM; Marcus RK
    Anal Chem; 2006 Dec; 78(24):8462-71. PubMed ID: 17165840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combination of column temperature gradient and mobile phase flow gradient in microcolumn and capillary column high-performance liquid chromatography.
    Houdiere F; Fowler PW; Djordjevic NM
    Anal Chem; 1997 Jul; 69(13):2589-93. PubMed ID: 21639394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of octopamine and tyramine traces in dietary supplements and phytoextracts by high performance liquid chromatography after derivatization with 2,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-3,4-dicarbaldehyde.
    Gatti R; Lotti C; Morigi R; Andreani A
    J Chromatogr A; 2012 Jan; 1220():92-100. PubMed ID: 22196247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of pressure and mobile phase velocity on the retention properties of small analytes and large biomolecules in ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography.
    Fekete S; Veuthey JL; McCalley DV; Guillarme D
    J Chromatogr A; 2012 Dec; 1270():127-38. PubMed ID: 23182282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Volume based vs. time based chromatograms: reproducibility of data for gradient separations under high and low pressure conditions.
    Stankovich JJ; Gritti F; Stevenson PG; Vajda P; Beaver LA; Guiochon G
    J Chromatogr A; 2014 May; 1343():79-90. PubMed ID: 24717849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.