BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2205578)

  • 41. Selective medium for isolation of Treponema hyodysenteriae.
    Songer JG; Kinyon JM; Harris DL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Jul; 4(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 134043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Enteropathogenicity of various isolates of Treponema hyodysenteriae.
    Kinyon JM; Harris DL; Glock RD
    Infect Immun; 1977 Feb; 15(2):638-46. PubMed ID: 844908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Extensive colonization of the porcine colonic epithelium by a spirochete similar to Treponema innocens.
    Jacques M; Girard C; Higgins R; Goyette G
    J Clin Microbiol; 1989 May; 27(5):1139-41. PubMed ID: 2745690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Immunity to Swine dysentery in recovered pigs.
    Joens LA; Harris DL; Baum DH
    Am J Vet Res; 1979 Oct; 40(10):1352-4. PubMed ID: 525852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Detecting anti-Treponema hyodysenteriae antibodies in swine serum using immunofluorometry.
    Schlink GT; Olson LD
    Can J Comp Med; 1983 Jul; 47(3):320-7. PubMed ID: 6357409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Sensitivity to different chemotherapeutics of Treponema hyodysenteriae strains isolated in Hungary.
    Molnár L; Szent-Iványi T
    Acta Vet Acad Sci Hung; 1981; 29(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 7342743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The etiology of swine dysentery. II. Effect of a known microbial flora, weaning and diet on disease production in gnotobiotic and conventional swine.
    Meyer RC; Simon J; Byerly CS
    Vet Pathol; 1974; 11(6):527-34. PubMed ID: 4467896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Parenteral immunization of pigs against infection with Treponema hyodysenteriae.
    Glock RD; Schwartz KJ; Harris DL
    Am J Vet Res; 1978 Apr; 39(4):639-42. PubMed ID: 148230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Swine dysentery: protection of pigs by oral and parenteral immunisation with attenuated Treponema hyodysenteriae.
    Hudson MJ; Alexander TJ; Lysons RJ; Prescott JF
    Res Vet Sci; 1976 Nov; 21(3):366-7. PubMed ID: 1030823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of five antimicrobials against Treponema hyodysenteriae and Treponema innocens.
    Messier S; Higgins R; Moore C
    J Vet Diagn Invest; 1990 Oct; 2(4):330-3. PubMed ID: 2095283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Light microscopic and ultrastructural changes in the ceca of chicks inoculated with human and canine Serpulina pilosicoli.
    Muniappa N; Duhamel GE; Mathiesen MR; Bargar TW
    Vet Pathol; 1996 Sep; 33(5):542-50. PubMed ID: 8885181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Comparative studies on the culture and serological fluorescence detection of treponema hyodysenteriae].
    Meier C; Amtsberg G
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1980 Oct; 93(20):402-6. PubMed ID: 7004436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Swine dysentery].
    Seeger K; Klatt P; Deutschländer N
    Tierarztl Prax; 1984; 12(3):307-15. PubMed ID: 6388028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Pathogenic synergism between Treponema hyodysenteriae and other selected anaerobes in gnotobiotic pigs.
    Whipp SC; Robinson IM; Harris DL; Glock RD; Matthews PJ; Alexander TJ
    Infect Immun; 1979 Dec; 26(3):1042-7. PubMed ID: 528047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Pathophysiologic features of swine dysentery: cyclic nucleotide-independent production of diarrhea.
    Schmall LM; Argenzio RA; Whipp SC
    Am J Vet Res; 1983 Jul; 44(7):1309-16. PubMed ID: 6309041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A study of swine dysentery by immunofluorescence and histology.
    Hughes R; Olander HJ; Kanitz DL; Qureshi S
    Vet Pathol; 1977 Sep; 14(5):490-507. PubMed ID: 335630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Survival of certain pathogenic organisms in swine lagoon effluent.
    Glock RD; Vanderloo KJ; Kinyon JM
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1975 Feb; 166(3):273-5. PubMed ID: 1133078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Swine dysentery: protection against experimental challenge following single dose parenteral immunisation with inactivated Treponema hyodysenteriae.
    Fernie DS; Ripley PH; Walker PD
    Res Vet Sci; 1983 Sep; 35(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 6635345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Application and evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunoblotting for detection of antibodies to Treponema hyodysenteriae in swine.
    Smith SC; Barrett LM; Muir T; Christopher WL; Coloe PJ
    Epidemiol Infect; 1991 Oct; 107(2):285-96. PubMed ID: 1936151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Characterization of predominant bacteria from the colons of normal and dysenteric pigs.
    Robinson IM; Whipp SC; Bucklin JA; Allison MJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1984 Nov; 48(5):964-9. PubMed ID: 6508310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.