BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22055811)

  • 1. Differences in quality characteristics of normal, PSE and DFD pork.
    van der Wal PG; Bolink AH; Merkus GS
    Meat Sci; 1988; 24(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 22055811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Colour, pH and weight changes of PSE, normal and DFD breast fillets from British broilers treated with a phosphate-free, low salt marinade.
    Sheard PR; Hughes SI; Jaspal MH
    Br Poult Sci; 2012; 53(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 22404805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rheological characteristics of fresh and frozen PSE, normal and DFD chicken breast meat.
    Zhang L; Barbut S
    Br Poult Sci; 2005 Dec; 46(6):687-93. PubMed ID: 16428111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship between pork quality and characteristics of muscle fibers classified by the distribution of myosin heavy chain isoforms.
    Kim GD; Ryu YC; Jeong JY; Yang HS; Joo ST
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Nov; 91(11):5525-34. PubMed ID: 23989883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The colour of the adductor muscle as a predictor of pork quality in the loin.
    Warriss PD; Brown SN; Paściak P
    Meat Sci; 2006 Aug; 73(4):565-9. PubMed ID: 22062553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intramuscular fat content has little influence on the eating quality of fresh pork loin chops.
    Rincker PJ; Killefer J; Ellis M; Brewer MS; McKeith FK
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Mar; 86(3):730-7. PubMed ID: 18156359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early Post Mortem pH decrease in porcine M. longissimus dorsi of PSE, Normal and DFD quality.
    Enfält AC; Lundström K; Engstrand U
    Meat Sci; 1993; 34(2):131-43. PubMed ID: 22060659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relationship of sarcoplasmic and myofibrillar protein solubility to colour and water-holding capacity in porcine longissimus muscle.
    Joo ST; Kauffman RG; Kim BC; Park GB
    Meat Sci; 1999 Jul; 52(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 22062578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shelf life of pork from five different quality classes.
    Faucitano L; Ielo MC; Ster C; Lo Fiego DP; Methot S; Saucier L
    Meat Sci; 2010 Mar; 84(3):466-9. PubMed ID: 20374811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Volatile production in irradiated normal, pale soft exudative (PSE) and dark firm dry (DFD) pork under different packaging and storage conditions.
    Ahn DU; Nam KC; Du M; Jo C
    Meat Sci; 2001 Apr; 57(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 22061715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biophysical aspects of meat tenderness.
    Tornberg E
    Meat Sci; 1996; 43S1():175-91. PubMed ID: 22060650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trained sensory perception of pork eating quality as affected by fresh and cooked pork quality attributes and end-point cooked temperature.
    Moeller SJ; Miller RK; Aldredge TL; Logan KE; Edwards KK; Zerby HN; Boggess M; Box-Steffensmeier JM; Stahl CA
    Meat Sci; 2010 May; 85(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 20374871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of electronic grading probes for the objective assessment of PSE and DFD in pork carcasses.
    Fortin A; Raymond DP
    Meat Sci; 1987; 21(3):159-73. PubMed ID: 22054895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Warner-Bratzler shear force values between round and square cross-section cores from cooked beef and pork Longissimus muscle.
    Silva DR; Torres Filho RA; Cazedey HP; Fontes PR; Ramos AL; Ramos EM
    Meat Sci; 2015 May; 103():1-6. PubMed ID: 25569815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Utilization of response surface modeling to evaluate the effects of non-meat adjuncts and combinations of PSE and RFN pork on water holding capacity and cooked color in the production of boneless cured pork.
    Schilling MW; Marriott NG; Acton JC; Anderson-Cook C; Alvarado CZ; Wang H
    Meat Sci; 2004 Feb; 66(2):371-81. PubMed ID: 22064140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using pork to teach students quality variations and how they are measured. 1998 UW-AS-305 Class.
    Kauffman RG; Russell RL; Greaser ML
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Sep; 77(9):2574-7. PubMed ID: 10492467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of cooked temperature on pork tenderness and relationships among muscle physiology and pork quality traits in loins from Landrace and Berkshire swine.
    Crawford SM; Moeller SJ; Zerby HN; Irvin KM; Kuber PS; Velleman SG; Leeds TD
    Meat Sci; 2010 Apr; 84(4):607-12. PubMed ID: 20374831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pork loin color relative to sensory and instrumental tenderness and consumer acceptance.
    Norman JL; Berg EP; Heymann H; Lorenzen CL
    Meat Sci; 2003 Oct; 65(2):927-33. PubMed ID: 22063457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of electrical conductivity to predict water-holding capacity in post-rigor pork.
    Lee S; Norman JM; Gunasekaran S; van Laack RL; Kim BC; Kauffman RG
    Meat Sci; 2000 Aug; 55(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 22061569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Objective measurements of pork quality: Evaluation of various techniques.
    Chizzolini R; Novelli E; Badiani A; Rosa P; Delbono G
    Meat Sci; 1993; 34(1):49-77. PubMed ID: 22060267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.