BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

549 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22056188)

  • 1. [Different methods for the induction of labour in postterm pregnancy].
    Winer N
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2011 Dec; 40(8):796-811. PubMed ID: 22056188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical methods for induction of labour.
    de Vaan MD; Ten Eikelder ML; Jozwiak M; Palmer KR; Davies-Tuck M; Bloemenkamp KW; Mol BWJ; Boulvain M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Mar; 3(3):CD001233. PubMed ID: 36996264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical methods for induction of labour.
    Jozwiak M; Bloemenkamp KW; Kelly AJ; Mol BW; Irion O; Boulvain M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Mar; (3):CD001233. PubMed ID: 22419277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Alfirevic Z
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prolonged and post-term pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).
    Vayssière C; Haumonte JB; Chantry A; Coatleven F; Debord MP; Gomez C; Le Ray C; Lopez E; Salomon LJ; Senat MV; Sentilhes L; Serry A; Winer N; Grandjean H; Verspyck E; Subtil D;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jul; 169(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 23434325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical methods for induction of labour.
    Boulvain M; Kelly A; Lohse C; Stan C; Irion O
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (4):CD001233. PubMed ID: 11687101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Misoprostol compared with prostaglandin E2 for labour induction in women at term with intact membranes and unfavourable cervix: a systematic review.
    Crane JM; Butler B; Young DC; Hannah ME
    BJOG; 2006 Dec; 113(12):1366-76. PubMed ID: 17081181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour.
    Alfirevic Z
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (2):CD001338. PubMed ID: 11405987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Gulmezoglu AM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (3):CD000941. PubMed ID: 11686970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a more effective agent than prostaglandin F2 alpha gel and prostaglandin E2 pessary.
    Majoko F; Zwizwai M; Nyström L; Lindmark G
    Cent Afr J Med; 2002; 48(11-12):123-8. PubMed ID: 14562597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour.
    Chen W; Xue J; Peprah MK; Wen SW; Walker M; Gao Y; Tang Y
    BJOG; 2016 Feb; 123(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 26538408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.
    Jozwiak M; Oude Rengerink K; Benthem M; van Beek E; Dijksterhuis MG; de Graaf IM; van Huizen ME; Oudijk MA; Papatsonis DN; Perquin DA; Porath M; van der Post JA; Rijnders RJ; Scheepers HC; Spaanderman ME; van Pampus MG; de Leeuw JW; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW;
    Lancet; 2011 Dec; 378(9809):2095-103. PubMed ID: 22030144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction.
    Moraes Filho OB; Albuquerque RM; Cecatti JG
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Aug; 89(8):1045-52. PubMed ID: 20636243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Membrane sweeping for induction of labour.
    Boulvain M; Stan C; Irion O
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (2):CD000451. PubMed ID: 11405964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
    Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Verocchi G; Volpe A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Induction of labour with a favourable cervix and/or pre-labour rupture of membranes.
    Crane JM; Young DC
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2003 Oct; 17(5):795-809. PubMed ID: 12972015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intracervical prostaglandins for induction of labour.
    Boulvain M; Kelly A; Irion O
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jan; (1):CD006971. PubMed ID: 18254122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre-induction of labor].
    Jagielska I; Kazdepka-Ziemińska A; Janicki R; Fórmaniak J; Walentowicz-Sadłecka M; Grabiec M
    Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 23700844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Methods for Inducing Labor].
    Girault A
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2020 Jan; 48(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 31669528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.