111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22056273)
1. Similarity metrics for surgical process models.
Neumuth T; Loebe F; Jannin P
Artif Intell Med; 2012 Jan; 54(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 22056273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Classification of surgical processes using dynamic time warping.
Forestier G; Lalys F; Riffaud L; Trelhu B; Jannin P
J Biomed Inform; 2012 Apr; 45(2):255-64. PubMed ID: 22120773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Providing metrics and performance feedback in a surgical simulator.
Sewell C; Morris D; Blevins NH; Dutta S; Agrawal S; Barbagli F; Salisbury K
Comput Aided Surg; 2008 Mar; 13(2):63-81. PubMed ID: 18317956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. LapMentor metrics possess limited construct validity.
Andreatta PB; Woodrum DT; Gauger PG; Minter RM
Simul Healthc; 2008; 3(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 19088638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing technical skill in surgery and endoscopy: a set of metrics and an algorithm (C-PASS) to assess skills in surgical and endoscopic procedures.
Stylopoulos N; Vosburgh KG
Surg Innov; 2007 Jun; 14(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 17558017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The quantitative evaluation of functional neuroimaging experiments: the NPAIRS data analysis framework.
Strother SC; Anderson J; Hansen LK; Kjems U; Kustra R; Sidtis J; Frutiger S; Muley S; LaConte S; Rottenberg D
Neuroimage; 2002 Apr; 15(4):747-71. PubMed ID: 11906218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contemporary virtual reality laparoscopy simulators: quicksand or solid grounds for assessing surgical trainees?
Thijssen AS; Schijven MP
Am J Surg; 2010 Apr; 199(4):529-41. PubMed ID: 20080227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Eye metrics as an objective assessment of surgical skill.
Richstone L; Schwartz MJ; Seideman C; Cadeddu J; Marshall S; Kavoussi LR
Ann Surg; 2010 Jul; 252(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 20562602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Training and assessment of technical skills and competency in cardiac surgery.
Lodge D; Grantcharov T
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Mar; 39(3):287-93. PubMed ID: 20724174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Generalized approach for modeling minimally invasive surgery as a stochastic process using a discrete Markov model.
Rosen J; Brown JD; Chang L; Sinanan MN; Hannaford B
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Mar; 53(3):399-413. PubMed ID: 16532766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.
Chandra V; Nehra D; Parent R; Woo R; Reyes R; Hernandez-Boussard T; Dutta S
Surgery; 2010 Jun; 147(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20045162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training.
Panait L; Akkary E; Bell RL; Roberts KE; Dudrick SJ; Duffy AJ
J Surg Res; 2009 Oct; 156(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 19631336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simulated laparoscopic sigmoidectomy training: responsiveness of surgery residents.
Essani R; Scriven RJ; McLarty AJ; Merriam LT; Ahn H; Bergamaschi R
Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 Dec; 52(12):1956-61. PubMed ID: 19934915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automatic data-driven real-time segmentation and recognition of surgical workflow.
Dergachyova O; Bouget D; Huaulmé A; Morandi X; Jannin P
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Jun; 11(6):1081-9. PubMed ID: 26995598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Decision making in laparoscopic surgery: a prospective, independent and blinded analysis.
Sarker SK; Chang A; Vincent C
Int J Surg; 2008 Apr; 6(2):98-105. PubMed ID: 17869199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of bench test evaluations of surgical skill with live operating performance assessments.
Datta V; Bann S; Beard J; Mandalia M; Darzi A
J Am Coll Surg; 2004 Oct; 199(4):603-6. PubMed ID: 15454146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel multimodal platform for assessing surgical technical skills.
Sonnadara R; Rittenhouse N; Khan A; Mihailidis A; Drozdzal G; Safir O; Leung SO
Am J Surg; 2012 Jan; 203(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 22075120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modelling and evaluation of surgical performance using hidden Markov models.
Megali G; Sinigaglia S; Tonet O; Dario P
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Oct; 53(10):1911-9. PubMed ID: 17019854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical models for computer-assisted neurosurgery.
Jannin P; Morandi X
Neuroimage; 2007 Sep; 37(3):783-91. PubMed ID: 17613249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The utility of endovascular simulation to improve technical performance and stimulate continued interest of preclinical medical students in vascular surgery.
Lee JT; Qiu M; Teshome M; Raghavan SS; Tedesco MM; Dalman RL
J Surg Educ; 2009; 66(6):367-73. PubMed ID: 20142137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
