206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22056295)
1. Experimental and histological investigations of the bone using two different oscillating osteotomy techniques compared with conventional rotary osteotomy.
Heinemann F; Hasan I; Kunert-Keil C; Götz W; Gedrange T; Spassov A; Schweppe J; Gredes T
Ann Anat; 2012 Mar; 194(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 22056295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraosseous heat generation during sonic, ultrasonic and conventional osteotomy.
Rashad A; Sadr-Eshkevari P; Heiland M; Smeets R; Hanken H; Gröbe A; Assaf AT; Köhnke RH; Mehryar P; Riecke B; Wikner J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 43(7):1072-7. PubMed ID: 26116310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [What is Piezosurgery? Two-years experience in craniomaxillofacial surgery].
Beziat JL; Vercellotti T; Gleizal A
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2007 Apr; 108(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 17360013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Light microscopic examination of rabbit skulls following conventional and Piezosurgery osteotomy].
Maurer P; Kriwalsky MS; Block Veras R; Brandt J; Heiss C
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Oct; 52(5):351-5. PubMed ID: 17915997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Practitioner experience with sonic osteotomy compared to bur and ultrasonic saw: a pilot in vitro study.
Rashad A; Sadr-Eshkevari P; Heiland M; Smeets R; Prochnow N; Hoffmann E; Maurer P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Feb; 44(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 25277806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Micromorphometric analysis of bone blocks harvested with eight different ultrasonic and sonic devices for osseous surgery.
Stacchi C; Berton F; Turco G; Franco M; Navarra CO; Andolsek F; Maglione M; Di Lenarda R
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1143-51. PubMed ID: 27527676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultrasonic osteotomy in oral surgery and implantology.
González-García A; Diniz-Freitas M; Somoza-Martín M; García-García A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):360-7. PubMed ID: 19570693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Osteotomy speed, heat development, and bone structure influence by various piezoelectric systems-an in vitro study.
Noetzel N; Fienitz T; Kreppel M; Zirk M; Safi AF; Rothamel D
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Nov; 23(11):4029-4041. PubMed ID: 30826919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Micromorphometrical and histological analyses using two different oscillating osteotomy techniques compared with conventional rotary osteotomy.
Perfetti G; De Tullio I; Berardi D; Di Iorio D; Spoto G; Scarano A
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2012; 26(2 Suppl):81-8. PubMed ID: 23164332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inferior alveolar nerve transposition--an in vitro comparison between piezosurgery and conventional bur use.
Metzger MC; Bormann KH; Schoen R; Gellrich NC; Schmelzeisen R
J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 16526578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Piezosurgery: basics and possibilities.
Schlee M; Steigmann M; Bratu E; Garg AK
Implant Dent; 2006 Dec; 15(4):334-40. PubMed ID: 17172949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Ultrasonic bone cutting in oral surgery: a review of 60 cases].
Stübinger S; Landes C; Seitz O; Zeilhofer HF; Sader R
Ultraschall Med; 2008 Feb; 29(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 18270888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrasonic bone cutting for surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME) under local anaesthesia.
Robiony M; Polini F; Costa F; Zerman N; Politi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 36(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 17112705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Physics and Histologic Evaluation of Rotary, Ultrasonic, and Sonic Instruments.
Ruga E; Amerio E; Carbone V; Volante M; Gandolfo S
J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 28(7):e609-e614. PubMed ID: 28806375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Piezoelectric Device Versus Conventional Osteotomy Instruments in the Comparison of Three Different Bone Harvesting Methods: An Istomorphometric, Phonometric, and Chronometric Evaluation.
Valente NA; Cosma L; Nocca G; D'Addona A; Lajolo C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1070–1077. PubMed ID: 30742138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Heat production during different ultrasonic and conventional osteotomy preparations for dental implants.
Rashad A; Kaiser A; Prochnow N; Schmitz I; Hoffmann E; Maurer P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Dec; 22(12):1361-5. PubMed ID: 21435005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new method for osteotomies in oncologic nasal surgery: Piezosurgery.
Salami A; Dellepiane M; Crippa B; Mora R
Am J Otolaryngol; 2010; 31(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 20015732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technological characteristics and clinical indications of piezoelectric bone surgery.
Vercellotti T
Minerva Stomatol; 2004 May; 53(5):207-14. PubMed ID: 15263877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of ultrasonic devices for bone surgery and associated intraosseous temperature development.
Harder S; Wolfart S; Mehl C; Kern M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):484-90. PubMed ID: 19587871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Piezosurgery in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
Pavlíková G; Foltán R; Horká M; Hanzelka T; Borunská H; Sedý J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 May; 40(5):451-7. PubMed ID: 21176870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
