These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22057943)

  • 1. An iterative self-refining and self-evaluating approach for protein model quality estimation.
    Wang Z; Cheng J
    Protein Sci; 2012 Jan; 21(1):142-51. PubMed ID: 22057943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MQAPsingle: A quasi single-model approach for estimation of the quality of individual protein structure models.
    Pawlowski M; Kozlowski L; Kloczkowski A
    Proteins; 2016 Aug; 84(8):1021-8. PubMed ID: 25737479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Benchmarking consensus model quality assessment for protein fold recognition.
    McGuffin LJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 8():345. PubMed ID: 17877795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MetaMQAP: a meta-server for the quality assessment of protein models.
    Pawlowski M; Gajda MJ; Matlak R; Bujnicki JM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Sep; 9():403. PubMed ID: 18823532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rapid model quality assessment for protein structure predictions using the comparison of multiple models without structural alignments.
    McGuffin LJ; Roche DB
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Jan; 26(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 19897565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of global and local model quality in CASP7 using Pcons and ProQ.
    Wallner B; Elofsson A
    Proteins; 2007; 69 Suppl 8():184-93. PubMed ID: 17894353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality assessment of protein model-structures based on structural and functional similarities.
    Konopka BM; Nebel JC; Kotulska M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Sep; 13():242. PubMed ID: 22998498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the quality of modelled 3D protein structures using the ModFOLD server.
    Roche DB; Buenavista MT; McGuffin LJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1137():83-103. PubMed ID: 24573476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The utility of comparative models and the local model quality for protein crystal structure determination by Molecular Replacement.
    Pawlowski M; Bujnicki JM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Nov; 13():289. PubMed ID: 23126528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of global and local quality of CASP8 models by MULTICOM series.
    Cheng J; Wang Z; Tegge AN; Eickholt J
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():181-4. PubMed ID: 19544564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving the quality of protein structure models by selecting from alignment alternatives.
    Sommer I; Toppo S; Sander O; Lengauer T; Tosatto SC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 7():364. PubMed ID: 16872519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of global and local model quality in CASP8 using the ModFOLD server.
    McGuffin LJ
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():185-90. PubMed ID: 19585661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of global and local model quality in CASP8 using Pcons and ProQ.
    Larsson P; Skwark MJ; Wallner B; Elofsson A
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():167-72. PubMed ID: 19544566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. United3D: a protein model quality assessment program that uses two consensus based methods.
    Terashi G; Oosawa M; Nakamura Y; Kanou K; Takeda-Shitaka M
    Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo); 2012; 60(11):1359-65. PubMed ID: 23124558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ProQM-resample: improved model quality assessment for membrane proteins by limited conformational sampling.
    Wallner B
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Aug; 30(15):2221-3. PubMed ID: 24713439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the absolute quality of a single protein model using structural features and support vector machines.
    Wang Z; Tegge AN; Cheng J
    Proteins; 2009 May; 75(3):638-47. PubMed ID: 19004001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. TopScore: Using Deep Neural Networks and Large Diverse Data Sets for Accurate Protein Model Quality Assessment.
    Mulnaes D; Gohlke H
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Nov; 14(11):6117-6126. PubMed ID: 30252470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of predictions in the CASP10 model refinement category.
    Nugent T; Cozzetto D; Jones DT
    Proteins; 2014 Feb; 82 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):98-111. PubMed ID: 23900810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. FunFOLDQA: a quality assessment tool for protein-ligand binding site residue predictions.
    Roche DB; Buenavista MT; McGuffin LJ
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e38219. PubMed ID: 22666491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural network pairwise interaction fields for protein model quality assessment and ab initio protein folding.
    Martin AJ; Mirabello C; Pollastri G
    Curr Protein Pept Sci; 2011 Sep; 12(6):549-62. PubMed ID: 21787307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.