These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22058294)
1. The extent of the bone defect affects the outcome of femoral reconstruction in revision surgery with impacted bone grafting: a five- to 17-year follow-up study. Garcia-Cimbrelo E; Garcia-Rey E; Cruz-Pardos A J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Nov; 93(11):1457-64. PubMed ID: 22058294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impaction bone grafting for femoral revision hip arthroplasty with Exeter Universal stem in Japan. Iwase T; Otsuka H; Katayama N; Fujita H Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Oct; 132(10):1487-94. PubMed ID: 22684741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Femoral revision surgery with impaction bone grafting: 31 hips followed prospectively for ten to 15 years. Ten Have BL; Brouwer RW; van Biezen FC; Verhaar JA J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 May; 94(5):615-8. PubMed ID: 22529079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Total hip arthroplasty in patients under 40 years of age and, if indicated, reconstruction of acetabular defects with bone impaction grafting]. de Kam DC; Gardeniers JW; Veth RP; Schreurs BW Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A811. PubMed ID: 20482927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A customised collared polished stem may reduce the complication rate of impaction grafting in revision hip surgery: a 12-year follow-up study. Flecher X; Blanc G; Sainsous B; Parratte S; Argenson JN J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 May; 94(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 22529078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Femoral reconstruction with endosteal bone allografts protected by a metallic mesh in reoperation of total hip prosthesis. 19 cases with an average follow-up of 83 months]. Migaud H; Jardin C; Fontaine C; Pierchon F; d'Herbomez O; Duquennoy A Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 9452810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Femoral impaction bone grafting in revision hip arthroplasty: 705 cases from the originating centre. Wilson MJ; Hook S; Whitehouse SL; Timperley AJ; Gie GA Bone Joint J; 2016 Dec; 98-B(12):1611-1619. PubMed ID: 27909122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of a cementless modular stem in the treatment of subtrochanteric femoral fractures in conjunction with ipsilateral coxarthrosis. Oztürkmen Y; Uzümcügil O; Sükür E; Karamehmetoğlu M; Caniklioğlu M Orthopedics; 2011 Jan; 34(1):13. PubMed ID: 21210621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. First-time revision using impacted morsellised allograft bone with a cemented Exeter stem: radiostereometric analysis of stem migration over nine years. Zampelis V; Ornstein E; Franzén H; Atroshi I J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Jun; 93(6):746-50. PubMed ID: 21586771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of femoral struts and impacted cancellous bone allograft in patients with severe femoral bone loss who undergo revision total hip replacement: a three- to nine-year follow-up. Buttaro MA; Costantini J; Comba F; Piccaluga F J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Feb; 94(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 22323680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcome after femoral revision using the restoration cone/conical femoral revision stem. Holt G; McCaul J; Jones B; Ingram R; Stark A Orthopedics; 2011 Jan; 34(1):11. PubMed ID: 21210631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Femoral impaction bone grafting with the Exeter stem - the Swedish experience: survivorship analysis of 1305 revisions performed between 1989 and 2002. Ornstein E; Linder L; Ranstam J; Lewold S; Eisler T; Torper M J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Apr; 91(4):441-6. PubMed ID: 19336801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Exeter Universal stem: a minimum ten-year review from an independent centre. Hook S; Moulder E; Yates PJ; Burston BJ; Whitley E; Bannister GC J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Dec; 88(12):1584-90. PubMed ID: 17159168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The bone-vacuum cementing technique for the fixation of the stem in total hip arthroplasty. Pitto RP; Kessler M; Schikora N; di Muria GV Chir Organi Mov; 2001; 86(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 12025052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device with bone allograft: minimum 4.5-year follow-up results and mechanical analysis. Akiyama H; Yamamoto K; Tsukanaka M; Kawanabe K; Otsuka H; So K; Goto K; Nakamura T J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Sep; 93(9):1194-200. PubMed ID: 21911530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Good survival of uncemented tapered stems for failed intertrochanteric osteotomy: a mean 16 year follow-up study in 45 patients. Parsch D; Jung AW; Thomsen M; Ewerbeck V; Aldinger PR Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Oct; 128(10):1081-5. PubMed ID: 17876593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impaction allograft with cement for the revision of the femoral component. A minimum 39-month follow-up study with the use of the Exeter stem in Asian hips. Yim SJ; Kim MY; Suh YS Int Orthop; 2007 Jun; 31(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 16964487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Weber rotation total hip replacement: a prospective 5- to 20-year followup study. de Jong PT; van der Vis HM; de Man FH; Marti RK Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Feb; (419):107-14. PubMed ID: 15021140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Segmental proximal femoral bone loss and revision total hip replacement in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip: the role of allograft prosthesis composite. Sternheim A; Rogers BA; Kuzyk PR; Safir OA; Backstein D; Gross AE J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):762-7. PubMed ID: 22628589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]